• peopleproblems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    we really need to stop calling it formerly Twitter and just call it Shitter.

    he ruined the platform, the people can ruin a name

  • @callcc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I would have loved to see the parts that are not under the US-American influence. What are Asian, African or South Americans using?

    • @emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Something like WhatsApp >> Youtube > Instagram > TikTok > Telegram > Facebook > Reddit > Twitter, with some variations and local additions from country to country.

    • kpw
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Facebook, mostly. For China it’s WeChat.

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What a lovely site! NSFW/not safe for egalitarians

        Tell me that’s like the Truth Social of Poland and only reflective of the extreme right (preferably lie if it’s not)

        ETA: this was the fourth hottest(?) post under “Excavation Hits” (Apple Safari translation). It’s not just them happening to share data… one top comment is the N word spelled using the phonetic alphabet, come on.

    • Kierunkowy74
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      For China:

      • TikTok is called there Douyin
      • WeChat
      • microblogging is mainly done on Sina Weibo
      • Baidu Baike (by Baidu search engine) is counterpart of Reddit?
    • @deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I don’t know what makes you think South Americans are not under US influence cause I can tell you things in Brazil look exactly the same: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Twitter… well, Whatsapp is also absurdly popular around here but I don’t think it qualifies.

      • @callcc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Sure, that formulation was not very good. But you get the idea. There is not only the “western” social media world. But what does it look like? I have no clue about what people use in Africa for example.

      • @Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        What’s app is also Facebook.

        So facebook, threads, What’sapp, Instagram are all FB owned lol. They need to be broken up for being that huge.

  • @lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I was reading the Wikipedia page linked just an hour ago.
    and I was surprised to see over a billion daily users on Facebook. I used to think at best that’d be in millions.

    I understand now that what do people mean when they day social media’s amplification of a certain message can have great impact. I used to take it lightly, partly because I an totally detached to any of these big platforms.

    and being on Lemmy is a wholly different experience.

  • @Panda@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    So this is the Pluto of the internet?

    To be honest, despite the smaller community, I feel more at home in the Fediverse than ever I did in those big, bloated, commercial communities.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Damn! I didn’t know so many people still use Facebook. But it still doesn’t sound right. I definitely don’t feel like 37.5% of Earth’s population uses Facebook.

  • @Luft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Can we please try to deadname Twitter harder? As a person who had an x in their name, it’s really annoying to have some dickhead copyright it

    • @dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      As a person who had an x in their name

      Does that mean you changed your name?

    • @drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I started lurking twitter somewhat regularly only after the reddit meltdown, and I’m already got so used to X that I instinctively type X into the address bar and press enter to go there. The problem is, it takes me to xvideos.com instead…

    • Kokesh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Yes. Quality is the key thing about fediverse. Also - size doesn’t mean everything. Black holes are small, but mighty. Lemmy sucks most of my spare time already.

      • @FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        My take away from this is lemmy is so good it’s actually a gravitational singularity pretending to be a social network 

    • AggressivelyPassive
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 year ago

      Thing is, you have to measure from the user base on the underside, this graphic obviously uses the wrong method.

        • AggressivelyPassive
          link
          fedilink
          English
          301 year ago

          Here too there are misconceptions!

          What’s important are the hard numbers, soft metrics like user count are misleading! Some may look large at first, but hardly grow with higher engagement, while in others engagement greatly increases the size.

          • @a4ng3l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            True. Related to that I wish there were more engagement on lemmy. Most of the posts in my stream have zero replies or 1 and it’s the bot. But let’s keep smaller numbers - quality over quantity.

              • @a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Same for me. I started to chit chat a bit here and there just to have some more activity but I miss a community I like to be part of.

            • Deceptichum
              link
              fedilink
              81 year ago

              We’re not filtering for quality vs quantity at the moment, more people isn’t going to change anything for the worse there.

              • @a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                True, it’s not at all stage where it’s likely to be a problem. The army of very old persons isn’t at the door just yet ;-)

      • @Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Not always

        Lemmy still doesn’t create enough content that I want

        But I try to use lemmy more anyways

        Hopefully more people will use lemmy more

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      It’s not the size of the ship, it’s the motion of the ocean.

  • @atmur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    881 year ago

    I’m surprised that the fediverse is as popular as it is, I would’ve guessed <500k. That’s awesome. I’m also shocked that Threads is apparently that popular, I completely forgot it existed immediately after it launched. I also didn’t know that Snapchat still existed, so maybe I’m just out of touch on social media stuff.

    • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      Facebook forgot it existed too, they just recently made it possible to delete threads accounts without deleting Instagram

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Threads was built on top of Instagram infra (essentially Instagram but for text posts) so it’s not surprising the two accounts were intertwined. Would have made it easy to roll out an MVP (minimum viable product) when there was a need for it, and quickly iterate on it after launch. The original launch didn’t even include a web version as it wasn’t finished yet.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Meta realized the same thing we all realized when we came here: userbase entrenchment is significantly more difficult to overcome nowadays than it was back in the 2000s when Facebook managed to pull everyone over from Myspace.

        Legitimately, it seems like the average user nowadays is so hellbent against even a modicum of inconvenience or a slightly less populated environment that they will accept literally anything. The big tech and social media platforms couldn’t shake off users if they tried anymore. They can do every every shitty, anti-user, anti-consumer thing under the sun and users will bitch about it, but never, ever try an alternative.

        And that’s why these companies and their devs don’t listen to feedback anymore. Why bother?

        • @niisyth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 year ago

          This is just factually untrue with the numbers lemmy by itself has being having. Not to say anything of Mastodon and et al. There wouldn’t be a mass exodus of highly engaged folks from reddit to lemmy if users just didn’t move anymore. Threads got big but then instantly deflated to a much lower number immediately.

          • @ericjmorey@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Active accounts on Lemmy instances is in the tens of thousands. I like it for the most part, but it’s not really a significant part of the 1.5 million in the graphic.

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Didn’t FB use some shady practice to make their users fall into Threads without noticing?

      • @hangonasecond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I think this was a misunderstanding of a bit of shitty functionality in threads. If you had Instagram and made a linked threads account, you would see follow suggestions for people who hadn’t made an account yet. It was basically “if this person makes a threads account I want to be following them”. I don’t believe it meant those suggested people had a shadow account or anything like that though. Still sketchy and probably drove inorganic growth, but I believe the number of users is counting the number of people opting into opening an account.

        It’s just naturally going to be incredibly high, because so many people use Instagram and would’ve been exposed.

    • CrimeDad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      The Fediverse is going to get a lot bigger once Meta turns on federation for Threads.

          • @drkt@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Oh yeah it works so I guess by that metric it’s not dead

            Of course, silly me

                • CrimeDad
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Yeah, but I don’t know if that really applies to XMPP. Google turned on XMPP federation for seven years and then turned it off. The article basically admits that it’s counterfactual to say that XMPP would have wider adoption or be more developed today if Google never did that.

                  I think a more significant concern would be if Meta hires away Fediverse developers, but that is separate from them just turning on federation.

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              i use it. conversations is a p good android app and it’s in the f-droid repo. disroot runs an xmpp service and if you’re cool, they’ll give you an account.

    • @TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Mastodon is by the biggest contributor to Fediverse as a whole. Has been adopted by tons of Orgs like EU, W3C, Verge, Flipboard, etc.

    • @njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      The fact that I regularly recognize my fellow Lemmings by username makes it feel small, but its not too hard to find a community full of strangers either.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I’m just curious what you thought might have happened to Snapchat? What app took its place in your estimation?

      • @atmur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I think I got Snapchat and Vine mixed up or combined in my head. I’ve never used either one, I thought it shut down years ago, but what I’m remembering is Vine shutting down.

        • @dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Vine was basically TikTok with shorter videos. I feel like it was a bit ahead of its time - phone cameras weren’t as good when it launched, and a lot of people didn’t have enough data to watch a feed full of videos.