• @pfjarschel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      As someone who works extensively with the spin offs instruments, I can safely say that they would be just as outraged. They are all bad quality, fail VERY frequently, and, guess what, you have to subscribe to be able to use all the features of the hardware you bought.

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Jokes on you. HP is moving into the energy sector with their spinning bodies with magnets attached.

      • @dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 year ago

        HP was indeed affordable and good. They made good laptops and laser printers for many years.

      • Dr. Bob
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        I remember Carly Fiorina getting hired and almost immediately things started turning to shit.

        • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I don’t know, it often seems that the prior ceo (often with the help of the board) sets a company up for quick profits, but long term doom. Then he leaves and they miraculously hit their first female CEO (see GM, Yahoo, Reddit, Blizzard, Twitter (currently)).

          • Dr. Bob
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I don’t disagree with that, but she knew exactly what she was brought in to do and jumped in with both feet. Would it have been someone else if she turned the gig down? Of course. But she said yes so it was her.

            • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Oh yeah, I forgot to add that Carly specifically does is probably a pretty terrible person (hard not to be when vying for republican office). Good point.

      • @Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        HP is still plenty serviceable as long as you’re getting HP Enterprise. The consumer stuff has been trash for almost 20 years now.

      • "no" banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Running Linux on a HP Victus desktop. The hardware is fine (I got it at a good price when my last home built PC crapped out and graphics cards were overpriced - it was simply the best deal at the time)… Bloat. Bloat everywhere in windows.

      • @egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Actually, they are still ahead of the competition in industrial printing, their indigo and pagewide web presses are very good and reliable, but of course those products belongs to a whole different market segment

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    156
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At their “cheapest” 0.099 euro / $0.11 USD tier it is already literally cheaper per page (albeit certainly not faster) for me to print documents as 8.5x11" 0.1mm thick single layer slabs of plastic on my 3D printer.

    An entire “blank” page, i.e. no cutouts for text or anything, would be about 0.754 grams of plastic. That’s about $0.0143 per page at a not-too-exorbitant retail cost of PLA filament ($18.99 USD for a kilo) and the material usage would be even less once the negative space for text is subtracted. And I don’t even have to buy the paper.

    That’s mind boggling. Apparently I’m in the wrong racket.

    • @n3m37h@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      That’s pathetic, hopefully they go out of business soon. Just think of all the filiment that could have been made instead of e waste

      • @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Their consumer line has very poor build quality. Cheap everything. All of the plastic is flimsy and breaks easily, inadequate cooling, etc. They’re built about as good as Acer, but at a price that you’d expect from a much, much better brand.

        Then there’s how dedicated they are to screwing you. I won’t touch them again for any reason after how malicious they were with the nVidia failures.

      • Joe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Dude. Brother was founded in 1908.

      • @PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Euuhh does nobody realize Brother has existed for like 20 years and doesn’t pull all this HP shit?

        You were right until around 2020 when Brother, too, started to roll out firmware updates outright blocking third party toners or even worse, making the printers intentionally print like crap with third party cartridges:

        https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131

        Now, that even Brother has turned to the dark side, I really don’t know what printer to recommend other than older/used Brothers with firmware updates disabled.

      • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Also, laser printers don’t dry out. Don’t need a subscription.

        “They cost money because they save money”

        My 1996 Lexmark laser just died this summer. Fortunately I inherited an HP laser (older one) with wifi. Works like a champ.

        Picked up a used color laser for $50 a couple years ago.

    • @Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      With all the Big Brains at HP making up all this atrocious bullshit you’d think one of them would say “why don’t we buy all the competition like the large media companies are doing? It’s not like the US will stop us, hell they’ll give us subsidies or something.”

  • @magikmw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Good, HP finally running their printer businesses into the ground. Paperless or bust.

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Subscription-based hardware business models, or anything that is cloud-based have a strong tendency to do this. They sucker you into buying their hardware with rock bottom prices and reasonable subscription fees and slowly they increase the prices and put more and more features and functionalities behind increasing paywalls.

    Never buy anything that you don’t fully own after paying for it.

  • @cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Cannon has gotten so bad, that I can’t remember what printer brand I hated before them. I am pretty sure it was cannon though.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I hate hearing that about Canon. I’ve always been a big fan and they used to be the reasonable ones. Of course my printer is a bit older, to the extent that it’s not supported in Windows 11 (it’s easier to print Windows documents from Linux or my iPhone), and it’s off my list for any future printers

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Yeah, I had a Canon BW laser printer that has chugged along and gave no complaints with a toner cartridge I paid $20 for a 3-pack. Another family member has inherited it but hearing the fact they are stepping up their DRM leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

  • @academia_sucks1024@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Are these posts about HP just a way for Brother to advertise in the comment section

    I mean I’m definitely cancelling my HP subscription, but still. It’s a lot.

    • Zerlyna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      Not advertising but I did buy a brother laser maybe two years ago for home. I rarely need color, if I need something stunning I’ll send it to Office Depot and pay .50 each. That’s maybe two time a year. $20 a year for an off brand toner cartridge otherwise.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      LOL, if not, Brother’s marketing should lean into it. I got an old HP laser that cranks 1,000+ pages for $20. I’ll run the wheels off it and buy a Brother.

      HP is coasting on goodwill from us old folks who remember when they were the best of best.

    • LUHG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      No. It’s like bitwarden. Everyone’s praising them to shill levels because they are generally that good. Brothers just run and run without nagging or insane prices. They do tend to be a little more expensive because they don’t lose money on the hardware like HP or cannon will.

      • @jo3shmoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Perfect analogy. I completely shill for both Bitwarden and Brother printers because they legit are just that good. When I find products like that they’re what I push to my family and friends because they “just work.”

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      If it helps even it out for you - I’m quite happy with my Epson lol
      I hate to /HailCorporate but it was affordable, takes cheap unbranded ink, and hasn’t given me much trouble (I don’t use it often, so the ink heads do dry, but a couple of cycles of head cleaning and they’re good to go again).

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I think it’s just wave after wave of people who are shocked to discover what a horrible mess HP printers are. Some of us learned it many years ago.

    • @PullUpCircuit@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’ll shill for brother because it’s cheap, they don’t lock out generic cartridges, prints well on the network from Linux, and seem to last.

      What they are missing on compared to HP is parts support. However, the comparable HP printer with parts support is twice the price and the parts are almost the cost of a new cheap printer.

      Lexmark is okay too, I guess.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    It’s literally cheaper for me to drive to a local printing shop, pay for parking, and drive back, than buy one of these dogshit HP printers, and then get scammed by their ink cartridges

  • @YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 year ago

    So the plan dictates how many pages you can print each month? Feck no! I own a Brother laser printer and I’m so glad I escaped the HP madness years ago.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      501 year ago

      Yes and no. If you exceed that, I think they just bill you for the next tier.

      If you cancel, they immediately remote disable the perfectly working cartridges already in your printer that are still full of ink. Even if you’ve fully paid for the remainder of the month.

      It’s a complete scam. Just don’t buy an HP printer, Instant Ink or not.

      • @beyondthegrave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Of course they disable the cartridge. You’re paying for ink on a subscription. If you didn’t pay for cart in full, why should you be able to use the rest of it? That’s literally what you signed up for. Otherwise everyone would get a full cartridge for $1.

        If you don’t want to do ink-cart-layaway, don’t sign up and buy the cartridge.

        Disabling mid-month is a scam though.

        • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Me: writes whole reply about why mid month canceling is a scam, and then realizing I didn’t read your last line and writing this instead.

        • @sndrtj@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          They could have made this subscription far easier and fairer if they wanted to. A service that simply buys a new cartridge once your existing one reaches a threshold (say 20% left) would be simple to implement, simple to understand and even be quite useful. Instead this Instant Ink thing is an abomination of multiple tiers and price gouging.

  • Pumpkin Escobar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    Holy shit, .15 euros per page? Why not just run to der Kinkos? I haven’t checked but I imagine it’s cheaper there. I get the convenience of having a printer at home but this is like if every cup of coffee you make at home cost you the Starbucks $8.25.

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      In the US, if you print ~52(+) B&W pages a year, HP Instant Spyware is seemingly cheaper.

      FedEx Kinko’s:

      Non-EU- lett Packard:

      For color, HP’s cheaper once you print two pages a month.

      Printing is a good excuse to walk to the local print shop. Let’s say, though, you have to drive your Honda Civic a couple miles through Los Angeles - that adds roughly thirty cents of fuel (ignoring other vehicle costs). (That’s our bestselling car in our second largest city, because you wouldn’t give up your parking spot in NYC.)

      Conventional wisdom is to buy a Brother laser printer, but there’s a bit of upfront cost for the color models, which are a little larger when comparing versions with scanners to inkjet all-in-ones. Who wants to do the math on those :)

      …whoh they have their own subscription!

      Anyway I think this is more like having a printing-press-barista in your closet instead of going to the print-barista down the street. It could be anywhere from 76 cents more expensive to $5.80 less expensive a month. Compare to a Mr. Coffee which you’ll pay off right away by skipping Starbucks.

      tl;dr let HP siphon your data, what’s the worst that could happen? 😈

      • Mellibird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        You forgot about that beautiful thing also known as your local library!

        Mine is around 2 miles away from my home and only charges me 10¢ per b&w sheet. Its absolutely perfect for any printing needs I may have.

        • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Unfortunately my city’s library system was hacked a few months ago and all of their computer services are down until January while they un-fuck things. In the meantime I go to Staples when I want to print.

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Great point!

          In San Francisco, it’s ten cents AND you get two bucks worth a day free.

          You reminded me: sometimes local politicians will let you fax (and thus perhaps print) free at their offices.

    • 50gp
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      probably cheaper to print with blood than to use HP printers

    • @tomasz@lemmy.sieprawski.pl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      The cheapest plan 0.099 Cents for each page 10 pages in the month. 1500 pages per month 54.99 € respectively.

      Yeah, depending on where you live, it may be cheaper to go to your local printer shop. Plus minus cost of transport and your time.

      I did not check HP’s prices to Poland. Table lists 100 pages as 0.07EUR/page. Krakow, Poland, nearby printer shop takes ~0.02-0.07EUR per A4 page, and there is no subscription. Nor doing 100 pages.

    • @TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      My thing is…they can dictate how much you use YOUR OWN PRINTER??? Like…how? Why? What.

      Like…

      WHAT.

    • LUHG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      $8.25 for a Starbucks? Man, it’s like £3.55-£4 here in UK.

      • Roman0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’ve got a whole 0.5kg bag of coffee for that much in Germany, and that’ll last me almost a month (~25 cups). What’s so good about Starbucks that it costs as much per cup?

        • LUHG
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Nothing really. I just can’t make that when traveling. Unfortunately when out and about in the UK you either have Costa, Starbucks or Nero around the same price or McDonald’s and Greggs which is cheaper. It’s very hard to find any local coffee shops.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Depends on location too. I live in Seattle, I don’t know the last time I’ve seen a cup for less than $6 on anything other than drip

  • @_number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 year ago

    hahahaa i recently dumped them for a big, sturdy, traditional, offline Brother laser. it’s ridiculous how much more satisfying it is to print, especially without HP breathing over your shoulder counting how many pages you’ve printed in the last billing period

    • LUHG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Satisfying isn’t the word. We have to generally use HP for SAP purposes so unfortunately I have to buy HP for work. Guess what? Every fucking month a few clients need printer support. Just HP bullshit time and time again…

      I have brothers, kyoceras and others that just work and work without any issues. But HPs are just nagging offline fucking pains in the ass.