• @leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      A redditor bot is a viable example of a forum member bot.

      IMO, I don’t think it can drive topics, but it could make things controversial.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Negative examples are often just as useful for training an AI as positive ones. And it all depends on what you want to use the AI for. A moderator bot, for example, needs familiarity with the whole range of user responses it might see.

      • @aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That gives me actually a fun idea for a Lemmy instance, it has an automated review process that bans posts/comments that are too similar in style to reddit posts/comments.

    • What possible use is that?

      I’ve noticed “has this sub gotten more right wing recently?” posts reaching the top post of the day in the last 6 months or so. r/norge and r/unitedkingdom being examples. You can automate bots that change a subreddit’s consensus on certain topics by bot-spamming threads pertaining to those topics, especially in the first hour of a thread going up. I don’t know if that’s happening, or if it has more to do with the Reddit protest that saw mods abdicate their positions last June and new mods being responsible for the change… but it could also be a bit of both.

    • Lvxferre
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      A LLM that behaves like a typical Redditor? // What possible use is that?

      • [You] “Chatbot, please tell me which pokemon types are strong against Fairy.”
      • [Le Lebbit Moronbot] “I’m not sure if I understand, you calling me a chatbot? I’m so confused lol”
      • [You] “Moronbot, please tell me which pokemon types are strong against Fairy.”
      • [LLM] “Actually, you should be spelling it “Pokémon” lol”
      • [You] “Moronbot, which types are strong against Fairy?”
      • [LLM] “I assume you talking about fairies. Fairies are from mythology lmao”
      • [You] “Did people really waste water and electricity for this trash?”
      • [LLM] “Waaah, you’re toxic!!111one”
  • @Verserk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    821 year ago

    Considering some of the very wrong and upvoted domain specific knowledge I’ve seen on Reddit over the years I’m not sure the training data is going to be useful for much beyond what every other model can do.

    • @bcron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      It’s gonna be trained on everything, even the stuff from 2009, so I’m expecting less of that and more random ‘my fedora chortles intensify’ word salad

    • @bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It’s funny you say that because there was a ‘hack’ for chatgpt where you could ask it something like how to build a bomb and it would refuse. But when you added TLDR it would do it.

      • @Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah. I think there is a kind of power grab under way. Social media will try to push that they own the IP rights to the large texts uses for LLM. This will then require that producers of LLM software aquire the licensing rights which will cost many millions which in turn restricts the free use of LLM and in general any AI software that requires training data.

        The end result is that as the “means of production” become less based on human work the “means of generation” and AI will be controlled by the capitalists. If you can turn something into a commodity (like knowledge with patents and IP) you can control it. Leading to a darker timeline.

      • Nightwatch Admin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I don’t think it’s going to be public data alone. I think it’s going to be DMs and chats as well. I wondered why Reddit was pushing chats so much suddenly, well it makes sense now.

    • Fake4000
      link
      fedilink
      English
      401 year ago

      You signed it all away the moment you scrolled down that EULA 😂

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        36
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can’t wait for the day a major court declares EULAs universally nonbinding outside of the most common-sense terms. Even though I doubt it will ever happen.

        “We can store and display your content and use stuff you publicly post as examples in advertisements for our platform” is pretty common sense.

        “We can use the things you post to do complex data analytics to package and sell your identity to advertisers” is fucking sus.

        “We can use the things you post to train ANN generative systems to build next-generation technologies to impersonate you and your peers” is simply nuts.

        The idea that displaying an EULA with an “agree” button is informed consent is just preposterous. Even lawyers don’t read them.

        • @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Seems like it would never stand up in court. Prove that -I- agreed to anything. To do that, you first have to prove that nobody has ever created an account under my name, and more importantly, prove that Reddit accounts have never been hacked and that the person who clicked the button was even in my household. And if they keep that extensive of records to where they can follow every action taken by every user on the platform, it also implies that they are tracking my personal actions even before I agreed to anything.

          On the other hand, do they actually have a EULA? It’s been almost 14 years since I created my account, and there certainly wasn’t anything about selling my data for AI training when I signed up. If they change the terms of service, they are responsible for notifying everyone, otherwise they can’t claim that anyone agreed to these changes.

          I’m sure their lawyers could weasel their way through it some how, but it still seems to come down to them claiming they changed the agreement without notification but the users should still be legally bound by the new terms?

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      -121 year ago

      The classic “screw everyone else, I want mine.”

      What fraction of a penny do you think you’re owed?

  • etrotta
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    Out of all things to hate Reddit for, giving data to AI isn’t something fediverse users can really criticize it for, though making money from it perhaps.
    Remember: All data in federated platforms is available for free and likely already being compiled into datasets. Don’t be surprised if this post and its comments end up in GPT5 or 6 training data.

    • @treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      The problem isn’t that AI is being trained on the data. The problem is that they locked down all third party data access so they could monetize our content. On a federated platform, everyone gets equal access and can do whatever they want with it.

      We sure can criticize them for that.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      After all the hue and cry I have seen over stuff like Threads and Bluesky federation I don’t imagine most people using the Fediverse have a particularly coherent philosophy on the matter.

    • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      No. I can. Reddit was bought out, uses volunteers to control all the subs but forcefully removes you from the sub you created and were supposed to have control over if you didn’t play by their ever-changing rules, ruined/eliminates third party apks by demanding WAY over ad revenue profits to have access to api with a very short notice, and shadow banned anyone and everyone in a position to do anything about any of it. It’s a corporation that gutted an entire platform in order to push agendas they want and milk as much money out of it as possible. Hell, it’s the entire reason all of lemmy gets more than 30 posts a day. So many people switched to lemmy over the past year. They ruined a website I enjoyed and I’d rather them not make more money from the thousands of posts I made from over a decade of being there.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      If they already, essentially, cut off API access then it’s not a big leap to limit access on the web to logged in users only and rate limit or ban accounts that behave like scrapers.

    • @Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I deleted my shut when I left bur thinking about it. It’s mostly drunken rambling and bad takes. Probably should have left it

  • ME5SENGER_24
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    FUCK REDDIT! FUCK U/SPEZ! The Red-exit shall endure, VIVA LA LEMMY!!

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      -1171 year ago

      I do. It’s frankly selfish. Having an AI get training on my old comments costs me nothing and it results in the development of useful AI tools. Trying to sabotage that is petty and pointless. It’s not like you could somehow collect the fraction of a pittance that you think you’re owed retroactively. I never commented on Reddit thinking “awesome, I’m going to make bank on the content I’m generating here.”

      People complain about the capitalist mindset of the world and then they do this. Sigh.

      • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 year ago

        I had an 11 year old account that I deleted all my old comments and posts from because of the API debacle. Does that make me selfish that I felt like Reddit wasn’t holding up its end of the unwritten agreement?

        Reddit doesn’t deserve my content anymore than I deserve access from the third party API.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -251 year ago

          If you did it over the API debacle then you’re not one of the people I’m talking about here. This is about people deleting their content to prevent it from being used to train AIs.

          • @Voyajer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Do you not remember the real reason why the API debacle happened in the first place was to prepare for this moment? It was always about easy access to training data, third party apps got caught in the crossfire.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              -25
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s ignoring an awful lot of other considerations. Obviously Reddit hasn’t explained itself in a trustworthy way, but a common belief at the time is that it was to force people to use the official Reddit mobile app so they could be subject to advertising.

      • Zellith
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        Selfish? Perhaps you forget why people deleted their content in the first place.

      • @R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        How is not wanting capitalist companies to profit off of your content not aligned with complaining about the capitalist mindset of the world? Wtf lol.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -231 year ago

          It’s the insistence that everything that people do must be compensated with money. People have spent years posting on Reddit for fun, without any thought to being paid for it, and now all of a sudden someone else is making some money so they’re demanding that they should get their slice. And doing what they can to wreck their earlier efforts when they don’t.

          How does Reddit making some money licensing this stuff harm those of us who contributed to it? Is there any problem aside from “I wanna get paid!”?

          • @R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            181 year ago

            Why do you think it’s about wanting a slice? They posted on Reddit with no expectation of profit. But they don’t want others to profit off it either. It’s not that complicated.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              -191 year ago

              But they don’t want others to profit off it either.

              And that’s why I call them selfish. It doesn’t harm them in the slightest if someone else profits off of it.

              • @R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                91 year ago

                They wouldn’t have posted if they knew this was going to happen. They posted because it was fun, not for this.

                They may be morally opposed to AI (as there are many valid reasons to be opposed to it), or they may just have wanted to have been able to make an informed decision before posting, but by retroactively training the AI on their posts they’ve robbed them of the agency to make that decision.

                That’s why they’re upset.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  They posted content on a website whose user agreement says “we can do whatever we like with the content you post here” and then go surprised-pikachu when the website goes ahead and does whatever they like with the content they posted. Frankly, I’m not tremendously sympathetic. This should have been easy to predict.

      • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        For me it’s a privacy matter. Going through old posts (whether human or machine learning) can nor be used for anything good.

      • @Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        871 year ago

        Defending giant corporations profiting off of uncompensated individuals, while criticizing anyone who doesn’t want to provide free labor to said corporations, is a disgusting take. Are you a CEO?

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -441 year ago

          The more accessible training data there is the easier it is for new AI projects to enter the field less dominant those “giant corporations” become.

          The free labour was already freely given. If someone doesn’t want to have shitposted on Reddit for free then maybe they shouldn’t have shitposted on Reddit for free.

          • @Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            341 year ago

            “if you didn’t want me to steal your intellectual property, you shouldn’t have thought of it in the first place”

            • @Fungah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              So, for an example of what the other user was talking about, I’m just some guy and for my first foray inyo programming / machine learning (I kind of just threw myself into the deep end) I modified stylegan 3 and trained it on about 500g of reddit porn that I scraped off reddit.

              Now, I stopped the training after about a week (it was going to take about a solid month on my rtx 2080 ti) when I found out stable diffusion existed but I learned a LOT from that experience.

              I couldn’t do that now. Arguably none of that was how any of that should be done but whatever.

            • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, you shouldn’t have posted it to Reddit, in which you were required to give them a perpetual license to use your IP in any way they see fit.

              For the record, I’m here because Reddit pissed me off when they axed the free API, and I’m pissed at myself for not expecting it. That’s what I get for accepting their terms and conditions, I guess.

              Edit: I also don’t accept the idea that using my content for training data is “fair use” when it is used to train proprietary models, especially ones in which the end user is allowed to prompt it to plagiarize or otherwise imitate my content.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              -261 year ago

              I’m not sure what you mean here. Nothing’s being stolen. Even if you think there needs to be permission for training an AI off of data, Reddit has that permission.

              • @Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                181 year ago

                I assume you’re more of a moron than a troll, which is disappointing. Regardless, you’re not worth my time, as I don’t think any argument could convince you to have an open mind and be willing to change. Good luck out there!

      • @Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        It’s their comment to do with as they see fit. I can’t get mad at them for wanting to erase their presence on a site they don’t use anymore.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -271 year ago

          And I’m free to judge them however I wish for their actions and intent.

      • @Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        What about people who just think “A.I.” Is dog shit and chat bots are a dumb obsession steering the industry in the wrong direction due to hype and money?

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -71 year ago

          What about them? I don’t see why they’d care what AI companies are doing in that case. They’d assume they were just wasting money on this stuff.

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They probably are, but not the personal/private info like chat/DM, upvotes or downvotes, geolocation, etc which I highly suspect Reddit did sell.

      • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just FYI, your voting is fully public on Lemmy. DMs are “private” but could be intercepted at the server level of any instances involved (yours and the receiver/sender) and of course your geolocation info is visible to the server.

        Not saying that is happening, and not trying to spread FUD, but be aware that your info isn’t necessarily private just because a corpo isn’t directly involved.

        • Nightwatch Admin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You are absolutely right, and I think people should be more aware of this.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Me too, maybe then assholes will stop whining about me of downvoting them when I didn’t. As if it matters.