• @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      There are a lot of quasi-celebrity types with a big following that don’t want to give up their follower base.

            • @unreasonabro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -121 year ago

              yeah. no that’s whistleblowers. you ever notice how every major whistleblower gets hit with a child porn charge? It’s like a label that reads “the government doesn’t think you should talk about this guy”. Nothing more than character assassination by our government. Ridiculous to suggest that someone used to being that furtive about something so shameful would also just want the world to know the truth.

              those two things don’t fit together, and yet it keeps happening. weird

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Or people with morbid curiousity like me who hop on to see the dumpster fire occasionally. Can’t say I recommend it.

          • @nexussapphire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Damn, I thought it was a requirement to shit post on Twitter while you’re shitty code compiles. How am I supposed to become a real programmer now? I guess I still got mastodon.

      • @selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whatever wing willing to pay, honestly.

        EDIT: I rarely see the voting system of lemmy for a reason. I find it cute, this reaction to the mere comparison between so-called “wings” in the American political system. Both, republicans and democrats, are two sides of the same coin.

        • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Strategic alignment. Getting his taxes cut counts. Of course, could be some deeper conspiracy. I’m not so anto- conspiracy that I don’t think people aren’t making grand plans to install trump.

  • @Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2251 year ago

    You’re telling me the company that once had ads for T-Mobile and Volkswagen and now almost exclusively has ads where random bots with NFT photos advertise ChatGPT ‘services’ isn’t doing well financially??

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      -331 year ago

      It’s important to note that “doing well financially” isn’t just revenue and user count, it’s also expenditures. If Twitter has managed to cut costs by more than whatever its income has dropped by then that could well be a good outcome for it, I’ve heard it wasn’t profitable when Musk took it over.

      It’s kind of ironic how big companies are frequently criticized for fixating on “endless growth” and “line goes up”, and then when a company or organization sheds that it also looks bad.

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s so much wrong with your understanding here…so I’ll just point out that you’re talking about Twitter as if it’s still a public company, it’s not.

        Also, Twitter was never profitable, and it was likely never going to be profitable. But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -121 year ago

          But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

          Which are?

      • @dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Twitter has 1.3 Billion / in interest payments alone as it took on $13,000,000,000 in debt for the honor of being bought out by Elon Musk.

        The owners of that debt have been quaking in their boots all last year. As Bankruptcy proceedings would make them the new owner of Twitter.

        Note that Twitter made $5 Billion revenue on its best year, and that’s likely halfed or worse.

        EDIT: $5 Billion revenue on its best year. Far less today and you still have all the OTHER costs going on. I’m sure Elon will prop up Twitter with Tesla ads or something but Twitter cannot stand by itself anymore.

      • @otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        If “lines goes up” meant things get better for the customers, the employees, and the world in general, then people would be cheering it on. Usually it means it gets worse for at LEAST one of the three, and sometimes all 3.

        Here, “line goes down” is following Twitter getting worse for the customers, the users, the employees, and the world in general. So people will cheer as it crashes.

      • Greg Clarke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        I thought Twitter’s infrastructure was going to collapse within weeks after Musk made all those cuts and changes. I was obviously wrong because Twitter’s infrastructure didn’t collapse. I’m not speaking to the user experience on Twitter but from a purely infrastructure perspective, Musk was right and I was wrong.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Uh-oh, you said something positive about Musk. I only said “maybe he’s not as bad as it seems” and look where that got me.

    • TherouxSonfeir
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Any time something gets too big it gets bots. Lemmy will be the same. We will see instances getting defederated who cannot manage the spam.

      Fuck Elon though

      • @GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If people set up their own instances with 100% LLM bots how would we even know they are bots to defederate? The AIs are too realistic. Only giveaway would be the ones dumb enough to make accounts post/comment 24/7 with seconds between each comment.

        • TherouxSonfeir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          I imagine the content would be bad, which is the whole reason an instance would become defederated.

        • @nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Right now, it’s still possible to realize texts are written by llms, due to style and mistakes, but it can become a serious problem in the near future, and we are kind of ignoring it, because no one is preparing in any way.

          • @GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It will take someone really smart to figure this out without requiring some form of identity confirmation (which would be horrible imo), like using credit cards or (even worse) government digital IDs (I live in a country where we have a gov ID app which can be used to sign documents and confirm ID online but if I had to use it on Lemmy or any other social media I’d just fuck off).

      • @psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Any time something gets too big it gets bots

        Dead internet theory, summed up in a sentence

    • Hypx
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I suspect even more than 30%, and by a lot. Nearly all of the communities that once thrived seem to be dead. It feels very empty.

    • @Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Wasn’t like one of his focuses going to be getting rid of bots? Did they just not do anything and the bots just invaded or did the bots just get better?

      • @WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I think the focus on bots was primarily used in an attempt to back out of the deal. It was never an issue, especially if it inflated his ego by pumping up his account.

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wrote this right as the first elon buying Twitter mentions were popping up…

    Notably, Twitter facilitated communication during the arab spring, where the people organized to stand against and even overthrow several broken and corrupt government regimes throughout the middle east - including some participation in places like Saudi Arabia, for example.

    Twitter’s second largest investor after a musk takeover… the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it’s de facto leader who, among other things, killed and dismembered an American journalist without consequence somewhat recently.

    And now Twitter is about to be killed… and dismembered.

    • @the_third@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Yep, Saudi Arabia bought that service and the price, giving a man child a toy that it would probably ruin quickly, looked rather attractive.

    • @m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      I’m sure a lot of the original population has dropped by a lot more than that, but in numbers they would have been replaced by an influx of fascists and bots.

      • @ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I’m taking note of all the prominent individuals and organizations which chose to remain on the fascist platform and thus implicitly support it.

      • @dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This article is a survey of Americans, not a computerized search.

        Unless a number of bots answered the telephone survey, I think the stats here are legit.

  • lettruthout
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m back to calling it Twitter. (Not that I’m ever on it though.)

  • @Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 year ago

    Needing to log in to view someones tweets means now I wont even visit the site when linked. Kinda the number 1 rule of platforms is to make them accessible to those that don’t already use it, so as to convert them later. Musk, and everyone around him letting these decisions run through, are idiots

    • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      ran into this last night.

      I hate twitter, but there was something I was trying to see and the only way to get the info was from a twitter post. Couldnt view the goddamn twitter post without creating an account and logging in.

      My immediate thought was “This isnt important enough for this bullshit” and immediately gave up.

      I’m convinced this login to view shit is to hide the explosion of right wing white supremacy/racism/etc posts and the bots echoing and amplifying it from people before they commit themselves to an account.

      • @ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 year ago

        Login to view started before Musk took over, FYI. I distinctly remember avoiding Twitter to spite them in those days.

          • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It did. I don’t remember when, but Twitter was getting hard and harder to access without an account before Musk. It might have been one of those Rolling Release things so everyone didn’t notice at once or something.

            In the beginning, Twitter even had an RSS feed for accounts you could subscribe to. When it shifted to nagging be for login, I installed a nitter addon and that that’s broken, I haven’t been there since.

  • @recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    I deleted my account and haven’t missed it at all. Then again I was never good at making use of Twitter, it’s too hectic and disorganized for me, and I have the same problem with mastodon.

    • @evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I’m glad I’m not the only person that doesn’t really understand the whole Thing behind Twitter / Mastodon feed thing.

    • @arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Definitely. I think it has just about reached a critical mass users writing content to attract new users and it looks so similar to Twitter there is practically zero friction in moving. I think it’ll really kick off when we see more heavy hitters coming over - big news networks, public figures, governments etc.

      I think news orgs in particular should be removing themselves from obnoxious social media platforms (e.g. Twitter) and move to somewhere where the engagement is more genuine and not toxic rants by racists and morons.

  • HatchetHaro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    I’m part of the 70%.

    I use it exclusively for gay furry porn.

    • @psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      X is one of his older websites, a financial platform that he created after his first startup was sold. Name comes from “X marks the spot” from old treasure maps, was to be the place for all transactions.

      It struggled and didn’t really get off the ground, but was able to merge with another platform called Confinity, run by Peter Thiel. The merged platforms then became PayPal, and made both guys rich as shit. Thiel eventually power played Musk and got him kicked out of the company, arguably for good reason, though Thiel is quite a piece of work, too.

      The new X is Musk’s attempt to make twitter more like his old site, and is why he was throwing around things like making it a peer to peer payment site, similar to WeChat / WePay or Venmo. How he plans to make tweets into bank transfers I’ve got no idea, esp. when losing 30 percent of users.

      More on this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2024/01/09/x-announces-peer-to-peer-payment-service-will-launch-in-2024/?sh=62ee775a75a8

      • @filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty much he wants to turn X/Twitter as WeChat’s clone for the West.

        As WeChat is both a messaging and payment app used by a couple of hundreds of millions of users in China where people can send money, split bills, pay, etc. using the app.

        Visa and MasterCard are extremely profitable companies enjoying really high margins and having very little competition. And this is very lucrative business:

        66% operating profit margin for Visa and 55% for Mastercard (four-year average). 51% net profit margin for Visa and 45% for Mastercard (four-year average). 50% per annum return on capital employed for Mastercard and 21% per annum for Visa (11-year average).

    • VindictiveJudge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      It’s his favorite letter or something. He’d wanted to name something X for a while. The closest he got before was SpaceX. Which I suppose now retroactively means SpaceTwitter.

    • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A robot created by Dr. Light with the capacity to reason and make decisions on his own, unbound by the laws of robotics. Could also stick to walls.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Who the fuck is still on that shitpile? Dudes. Stahp.

  • @arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Doesn’t surprise me. Musk has cultivated and emboldened racists, homophobes, cryptobros, misogynists, and the far right and the platform has turned into a cesspit. Meanwhile scammers & bots run rampant and the blueticks stink up every thread with cretinous remarks and trolling.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of people have just given up with it, or moved to another social media that isn’t so toxic.

      • @arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Not really. Pre-musk, reporting racism & other abuses was more likely to illicit a response than not. Nowadays it is a was of time to even bother unless it is extremely overt… And all the shitheads with few exceptions who were perma banned got reinstated no matter how awful they were.

        And the situation with blueticks is self evident. It used to mean somebody noteworthy - journalists, actors, politicians, authors, scientists etc. Now it’s trolls and narcissists with money to waste on a vanity tick. Popular feeds will have pages of inane comments by these scumbags to scroll through. There are even actual Nazis with blueticks who complain/brag about the ad revenues they receive from engagement. It couldn’t be any more removed than the way it was.

    • @Hoticeberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I feel the same way. I’m only ever on to check for updates on certain companies and games I follow. I wish they would adopt anything else.