HBO Max was renamed Max, and Warner Bros. Discovery lost subscribers::Warner Bros. Discovery lost 1.8 million subscribers in the second quarter of 2023 following HBO Max’s rebrand to Max. The company now has 95.8 million subscribers across all of its services.

    • @Misconduct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I also saw a lot of posts from people that just had issues even getting logged in or with opening the app itself. Honestly it’s embarrassing for such a large company to look so incompetent.

    • @IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      The menu configuration is nearing Amazon Prime levels of stupidity when they used to have one of the easiest to navigate.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Right, the title implies it has something to do with the name change, which is silly. The reason Max has fewer subscribers than HBO did is that HBO was objectively better than Max is.

  • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 years ago

    It’s pretty ironic how companies will spend so much money on advertising to gain brand recognition, but then throw it away on a whim.

    • @neutron@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I imagine executive meetings with people rambling about (an already well established) brand cannibalizing (what could become, if everything goes perfectly, an equally or even more recognized) brand. Basically, throwing away what you have for what you could have in the future.

    • @Techmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      It’s just like spending, what was it, 44 billion dollars or something like that to own Twitter, and not even a year later you drop the brand and rename it X. Like, dude, any decent programmer or sysadmin could spin up a copy of Twitter in a few days of work. You paid $44 billion for the brand.

      • @Drusenija@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        44 billion for the brand, but more importantly the user base. Although let’s not discount the tech behind the scenes. Any decent programmer or sysadmin might be able to spin up a copy of Twitter in a few days. But it’s not going to scale to the size Twitter is, and have all the moderation and legal tools Twitter does (although Elon is gutting those by the day), integrate into as many places as Twitter does, have the app infrastructure Twitter does, etc.

        But regardless, all those things are irrelevant without people actually using the service. No clone is going to have the user base, and even with the rebrand to X, Elon still has a lot of users. Not as many as when he started, but still a lot. That’s what the 44 billion bought.

    • @kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      And they all equally suck. It’s really amazing how they can all be so terrible at the same time.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    Bad Faith podcast had an episode on the strike a couple weeks back. The guests (strikers) talked about how Zaslav renaming HBO to Max is right inline with their intent to churn out “good enough” content to increase profits rather than increase quality. They likened it to a signal to Wall Street to improve their share value.

  • alliswell33
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Very dumb rebrand. I like all the trashy TLC content don’t get me wrong, but changing the name was completely unnecessary.

    • @CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you like that reality garbage, I won’t yuck your yum, but I enjoyed not having to see any of it. I miss being able to forget that shit like Obese Hoarder Wars or Little Person with 13 Kids exists.

    • arefx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I remember when TLC was the learning channel. Used to be awesome.

  • @infyrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I truly do wonder sometimes, who is around the round table that decides how things should be named?

    Whoever they are, they are the poorest naming people around. They probably fuck up naming their pets or hell, their children.

    • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      It depends on the company. Most of the time it’s somebody in charge fancying a certain name for no reason whatsoever and everyone around them kissing their ass about how great it is.

      Sometimes it’s a little more organized and everybody at the table starts spit bowling names until somebody in charge goes yeah I like that and then they’re All falling over each other too gosh about how great it is.

      Smart places hire an overpriced PR firm who does market research and then listens to their advice.

      Years ago we started a new project. It was exactly the same as our existing project, but with a few minor new features and a fancy new four letter name. I wasn’t high enough on the totem pole to be included in the discussions about the project It just came to me to help do the work.

      Oh great name I guess what’s it stand for? Oh uhh nothing. We just made it up. Really? It sounds like it should be a bird or something. Nope we looked it up It doesn’t have any meaning.

      A few weeks later I’m driving into work a different way than I normally take and there’s a smoke stack with the damn four letter name on the side of it. They named the new product after a local company who probably named themselves after someone’s last name.

      For the next couple of years every time anyone asked about the product the very first thing they asked is where the name came from. Yeah I don’t know, they just made some s*** up.

    • KluEvo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      fuck up naming their pets or hell, their children

      I mean, you have heard about what Musk named/wanted to name his child, yes?

      • @Misconduct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Money makes people think they’re special which of course means they can’t have lowly common poor people names. To the absolute detriment of their kids. I would be livid if I got some of the stupid ass names these people are cursing their children with I stg

  • @Porcupine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    HBO = my brain thinks Game of Thrones, Sopranos, The Last of Us, Band of Brothers, Chernobyl. Literally decades and decades of quality premium content.

    MAX = porn. My brain immediately associates the name with porn. Idk why.

    • @CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      For me it’s because of Cinemax - ie Skinemax - which used to be associated with the softcore porn they’d play late at night.

      It always mystified me that HBO Max was even able to use that name since it was so evocative of another premium cable network.

  • @emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I want to pay for max so I can watch warrior season 3 and let their BS algorithm know there’s interest in it and not cancel it outright. They don’t even allow subscribers from my country UK so I have no choice but to pirate. They also have not released the season 2 bluray yet and I’m not gonna get the season 1 one if I’m just gonna end up with an incomplete collection cause this company is just allergic to taking my money.

    • Kalash
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      You can use a VPN to get around regional blocks like that.

        • Kalash
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The alternative is pirating (which I’m all for), which also should be done through a vpn anyway.

          • SRo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Many (most? It’s just north America I guess) countries don’t give a shit about piracy and would never allow an ISP to give out ips and personal information to companies so they could sue. So, depending where you live, no VPN needed.

            • Kalash
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              It’s not just America, but all the anglosphere and the entire EU, too.

          • @phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You’d need to find somewhere that doesn’t depend on ratios. Not many VPN providers support seeding ports these days

      • @CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Sometimes. Many of their IP ranges are blocked on streaming services because they know people are using them to get around regional blocks.

    • @XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      My 27$ per stock investment back in the day was my worst decision so far…

      “I’m never going to financially recover from this”.

  • @thessnake03@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    562 years ago

    I don’t get why they made Max a completely different app. I mean I also don’t get dropping the hbo monicker, but why did I have to get a brand new app instead of them just reskining hbo max

  • rigatti
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    Now they should cut more letters and just make it x. That’s called branding efficiency.

  • @Jarmer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    LOL you can’t even have a conversation with this name.

    “Oh I’ve been watching this awesome new show, it’s so good.”

    “oh yeah, where can I watch it?”

    “max”

    “…???..”

    “it’s on max”

    “what? max what?”

    “it’s the old hbo, it’s just max now though”

    “hbo renamed themselves to max?”

    "no … but … "

    “okay nevermind”

    • GONADS125
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I started a discovery plus account because I wanted to watch Mythbusters and Dirty Jobs again, after all these years. Then immediately after, the merger happened and they came to max (without commercials like on my discovery trial), so I immediately canceled discovery plus.

  • @jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    I swear that companies are really misunderstanding how most people interact with brands, or I am. But given recent events, I think it’s the companies. On another topic, for reasons I cannot fathom, Schwans home frozen food delivery is re-branding from Schwans’ (which is hard for me to spell, but easy to say) that it’s been since the 1950s and is widely understood and recognized. What are they re-branding to? It sounds like they got right up to date with mid 90s Internet company branding, going with Yelloh! (I think). No one wants to say Yelloh!. It looks stupid, and somehow more out of fashion than their old logo.

    We’ve got whatever the heck is going on with Twitter/X, we’ve got this (Yea, no one recognizes HBO, that’s OLD./s) The Great Courses Plus renamed Wondrium (which is again, giving up a rather well known brand in some niches with an obvious idea that it’s slightly different as a subscription). At least this doesn’t entirely sound / look stupid, and they added content when doing it, but still.

    I probably could go on, but just… why? IDK - have you ever looked at an existing brand and thought - oh, that’s too dated? Usually companies pull this stuff to “trick” people into thinking it’s a different company, like when Blackwater became whatever, or Jeep etc became Stellantis. Such self owns.