• appel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    166
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Smartphone CEOs dumbfounded when no one wants to buy their $1999 xPhone 25 Pro Max XXL Z-Flip 4d-folding hextuple AI 8k camera with Bionic 10Ghz chip including real neurons

    • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      Which is ironically the same as the $1999 xPhone 24 Pro Max XXL Z-Flip 4d-folding hextuple AI 8k camera with Bionic 10Ghz chip including real neurons from last year.

      • Senicar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        402 years ago

        Nah, the 25 has a stylus. The 24 didn’t. The 26 won’t either.

        • @Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          The 27 will come in an exclusive shade of grey! Instead of last year’s exclusive shade of dark grey. Rumor has it they might even try a grey-green in 2030.

  • @xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Devices are prohibitively expensive these days. The marginal gains from improved tech is also not used to benefit the end user. Devices are not working for the one that pays for it. If only they would release a flagship device with unlocked boot loader, open drivers and a pledge to support it for 10 years. I would buy that. Otherwise I see no need to upgrade.

    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      It’s less that the improvements are marginal (modern flagships are significantly more powerful than 4 years ago for example), it’s just that 90% of people have absolutely no use for most of that increased power. The most intensive thing most people do on their phone is watch media.

      • @nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I know a lot of young men who, if they have money, just have to have those extra gigaflops and that 4k 90hz phone screen.

        Then 95% of the time they browse the web and use it for twitter, etc… 🙄

  • @zerbey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Jokes on them, last phone I bought from them was in 1999. Still have it somewhere. Haven’t used it since 2000 or so of course.

  • @FriendlyBeagleDog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I could understand upgrading so frequently at the advent of mainstream smartphones, where two years of progress actually did represent a significant user experience improvement - but the intergenerational improvements for most people’s day-to-day use have been marginal for quite some time now.

    Once you’ve got web browsers and website-equivalent mobile apps performing well, software keyboards which keep up with your typing, high-definition video playback working without dropped frames, graphics processing sufficient to render whatever your game of choice is for the train journey to work, batteries which last a day of moderate to intense use, and screen resolutions so high that you can’t differentiate the pixels even by pressing your eyeball to the glass - that covers most people’s media consumption for the form factor, and there’s not much else to offer after that.

    • @agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      If the batteries were easily replaceable, and the software didn’t continually get bloated, and companies kept issuing security patches, sure.

      I kept my last desktop system for 10 years. Actually I still have it and it performs sort of ok (I was running Mint the whole time). But I upgraded and the performance improvement was actually worth the considerable cost. I’ve gotten similar life out of my other desktops and laptops over the years.

      I think at least 5 years or preferably 10 is reasonable for smart phones.

    • @OscarRobin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      Yeah my semi-techie friend still has an S9+ from over 5 years ago and honestly he isn’t really missing anything beyond a few iterative improvements.

      • @dukeGR4@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        S9+ from over 5 years ago

        he’s been missing out on 3 years + of security updates kek

        *cries in Samsung

  • @Chickerino@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    ive only upgraded from my 2014 shit phone in 2021, and i plan to do the same with this one for as long as i can

  • @aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    i use electronics until they’re unusable. my last phone lasted 6 years, my laptop lasted 11 years. i don’t have a tv or anything else.

      • @Thoth19@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I watch all of my shows from laptop personally (not the person you are replying to). I don’t care super hard about the big screen. And it means I can do other things on my other monitors at the same time.

        • @dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I like working at the living with the TV precisely because it offloads the work to a different device. So compiling and running heavy scripts doesn’t affect the video playing and the reproduction doesn’t compete for CPU/GPU cycles or internet bandwidth with work tasks. It’s not about the big screen (though I do enjoy big screens) but more about separation of concerns.

  • @hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    i used to buy a new one every 2 years or so,but after switching to pixel 6 and graphene os, I think I will replace it once it’s no longer supported.

  • @9up999@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I just use my budget xiaomi with custom rom wich i bought back in 2019. What i miss the most is maybe nfc so i might change it next year.

  • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    772 years ago

    Unless you’re doing very specialist stuff, phone tech peaked a while back for the average user who’s only going to do some web browsing, social media, listen to some tunes or watchbsome funny videos. All the little incremental changes aren’t groundbreaking for that use case.

    Until foldables are both reliable and cheaper, phones have stagnated in terms of visably appealing features.

    • Ready! Player 31
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Yep, I’ve just gotten a Pixel 7 Pro after 4 years with a Oneplus 8 Pro and really it’s a very incremental change. The camera on the P7P is incredible, just astounding, but on the Oneplus it was amazing. Otherwise they’re very much of a muchness.

      I’m thinking I’ll hang on to this one for another four years and hopefully by then foldable will be well tested and slightly cheaper.

      • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        What’s funny is that the camera on the Pixel isn’t a hardware thing. It’s mostly the post processing software that Google uses. So even that doesn’t require upgrading to a new phone that often, since the hardware isn’t as important as it once was.

    • @nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Yup. Price per flop or whatever is cheaper than ever but after a certain point it doesnt matter. Also I don’t do specialist stuff on my phone. I do it on my desktop rig that can actually run arbitrary code I give it.

      I do have a few friends with money who just need that latest 50 megapixel phone camera or that 4k phone screen. But I don’t much care.

    • @SeaOtter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -15
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not sure I agree that phone tech has peaked a couple years ago for the average user. What technology peaked years ago?

      Camera? Efficient processors? Display panels? Biometrics? Batteries? Cellular/Wi-Fi modems? Emergency satellite connectivity? I cannot think of a single technology (I am on iPhone 14 Pro) that is not at least marginally better than a year or two ago, and pretty meaningful improvement from ~5 years ago.

      The rate of technological improvement has slowed or plateaued, but there is a pretty reasonable argument that current flagship technologies are the “peak”, even for average user, if only incrementally. I agree that this plateau, coupled with upgrade cost, is making it a harder choice to decide to upgrade for average user.

      • WagesOf
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        You’re on apple, they certainly haven’t had a user noticeable change for the last 6 years.

        For me on android the last “must have” was variable refresh up to 120hz. I’ll probably even do a battery upgrade on my s21 when it can’t last a full day rather than hit an s25.

        The only blocker I’ve hit with is yuzu on android, which kind of just doesn’t work at all still.

        • @itsJoelle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 years ago

          It’s interesting you claim “they certainly haven’t had a user noticeable change for the last six years”, and then cite a feature addition “on android” which was implemented on the iPhone 13.

        • @SeaOtter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Okay. Trying picking up a iPhone X (releases Sep 2017) vs iPhone 14 Pro and see the difference. There are a lot of quality of life improvements that make a noticeable difference in user experience.

          • 120hz
          • better battery life
          • 2x as fast charge
          • much brighter screen, always on if that interests you
          • triple camera sensors, with wide lens vs double, no wide lens
          • LiDAR to improve portrait photos
          • faster Face ID (used 100s of times a day)
          • satellite communication for emergencies
          • MagSafe charging/docking ability
          • 5G (really only find it useful for hotspots)

          I can confidently say everyone of these features has improved my user experience. None of them by their self are earth shattering, but taken as a whole, the constant iterative improvements have amounted to quite a lot.

          • Freeman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            As someone who just had an Galaxy S7 or something for 6.5 years this all sounds way overkill. I’d probably disable everything possible to get even more battery life out of it.

            If someone uses this phone for gaming or working or for documenting/photographing a trip or something, then its maybe worth it but for everyday use its just overkill imo

          • @waz@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Still using an iPhone X and the only things in your list that interest me are faster charging and LiDAR. But nothing to do with portraits; I want it for 3D scanning objects for CAD models for 3D printing. But I’d use it maybe a few times a year.

          • BlueÆther
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            as someone with an XR the only thing on that list maybe the camera and sat coms, but I have a DSLR and InReach device

      • @stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Cameras are mostly software improvements these days. I argue displays have gotten worse with the drop from QHD to 1080p. Many think that the back fingerprint readers are better than the under screen or facial ones. 5G is mostly pointless. All while costs have increased greatly. A phone today doesn’t better meet my use cases than the phone I had 6 years ago and in many ways is worse (lower res screen, no headphone jack, inflated prices).

        • QuinceDaPence
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          Many think that the back fingerprint readers are better than the under screen or facial ones

          They are. I could have my phone unlocked before even seeing the screen with the one on the back. The under screen one sometimes takes a couple tries and takes longer when it works. It’s cool tech, but the stand alone reader was better.

      • @nudl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 years ago

        If anything if you just go with “got good enough for the average user years ago”, that works.

        I’m on a cat s62 pro with a 5 year old Snapdragon 660, and, while it shows its age, it functions just fine and will for the next few years.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      Just get a the battery replaced. With the new rule for the EU forcing companies to make the phones with user replaceable batteries, it’ll be even easier.

      • @BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I thought about it last time but the whole thing where I’m not getting OS updates anymore make me anxious. I’m not sure that’s actually a problem though.

        • @anguo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          It’s a little more hands on, but when you reach the end of OS updates support, you can switch to a community-supported OS.

            • @anguo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              No, there are unfortunately no truly workable Linux OSs for phones yet AFAIK. But there are plenty of Android-based OSs that work really well, and are usually maintained for quite a while, depending on the popularity of your device. Look into LineageOS, or Pixel Experience, to name a few.

              • Fubber Nuckin'
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                There’s ubuntu touch. I’m not sure how many phones that works on though.

            • @EtherWhack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              Sorta. (Android is technically Linux) What you would want to look into is a custom Android ROM. Something like OmniROM or ArrowOS.

              As a side note though, installing can be a bit technical for some people and some apps don’t like to work outside of the “security” of a factory version of Android. If you are interested, I would browse around the custom Android communities here (if there are any yet) and check out sites like https://www.xda-developers.com/

                • @ThePinkUnicorn@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  32 years ago

                  Rooting is a slightly separate thing from sideloading a custom rom, rooting gives apps you give permission to access to system files whereas sideloading a rom replaces the system files but doesn’t necessarily give you root access. Both involve a similar process of unlocking the bootloader, installing a custom recovery and flashing a file so it is easy to get the two things mixed up.

  • ODuffer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    You’ll have to prise my 4a 5G out of my cold dead hands…