Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

  • @RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Better to leave your phone at home (or better, in the pocket of someone who lives in your house and takes the same daily path as you do) if you are doing something that’s currently illegal. Or in any situation where you are doing something legal that the cops are likely to break up.

    The juror going home thing is terrifying but I don’t think the government would be after you for fulfilling your civic duty.

  • Waldowal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 months ago

    Some additional info based on their published material (screenshot below). The software gets its data from “publicly available sources” which includes tracking information from many different online advertisers, public social media posts, etc. As we know, the advertising data can sometimes have your personal info attached - sometimes not. Babel Street claims to anonymize the data, but let’s assume there is a $$ amount at which they won’t.

    So, theoretically, if you can successfully avoid ad trackers, and you don’t post on social media platforms except where you want to be “seen”, you can avoid this tracking (granted that seems quite impossible these days).

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Or - OR, right, everyone can turn off location and WiFi on their phones.

      It’s true the cell ping is always going, but that’s a different thing and definitely not what this tool is using to track people. Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

      • @suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        The problem is turning off wifi doesn’t actually turn off the wifi, it just stops a subset of packets being broadcast and won’t trasmit any data you want it to send. Among other things this is how ‘find my device’ works with the wifi and bluetooth “off”. They’re actually on.

        • Midnight Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          You can turn this wifi and bt scanning/‘location accuracy improvements’ off though, at least on android. It’s tucked away in the settings but once it’s done, it’s done.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

        You really need to read the entire article. Turning off your WiFi and deleting Facebook isn’t going to fix this.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s a good start tho

          This sort of surveillance is only possible because of the mobile advertising ecosystem. Location data is sometimes used to build profiles on device users and better target advertisements to them. Much of that advertising relies on a MAID, the unique advertising ID, on a phone. The MAID acts as the digital glue between a device and its associated data.

          But that same underlying system, of Google and Apple linking a unique identifier on the phone to a user’s activity, allows Babel Street and others to build their mass monitoring products. In many cases, a device’s MAID is also displayed inside Babel Street.

          So periodically refresh / replace your ad id as well.

      • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        That won’t work. But if you install the ROM without gapps or closed source software, you don’t have to worry about these issues.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Having just done that for the first time I feel confident in saying anyone who’s still using facebook or Xitter or tiktok or whatever - is not going to do that. I wish they would but that’s an order of magnitude more technical than where they are.

          • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Counterpoint - the only reason I didn’t degoogle earlier was because my phone simply didn’t support Lineage or Divest. Chances are that whatever budget Chinaphone you have would be in the same situation. Now I bought a Pixel specifically with the intent of installing a privacy-preserving OS, but for a while most I could do was ADB-disabling Google services.

            Unlike installing Linux, chances are high that a degoogled OS wouldn’t work on the hardware you already have.

            • Optional
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 months ago

              Oh it took me a solid month of trial and error, scrolling through xda and other forums reading every how-to and watching plenty of vids and I finally got it to work. But it was not even fun. Yes starting with a Pixel is better, but f* teh googlez.

      • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 months ago

        I don’t think cellular location would be excluded from such tracking tbh. I would rather not take my phone with me at all when visiting such a potentially sensitive place, or at the very least use a Faraday cage.

    • The Hobbyist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      595 months ago

      That does not sound like a viable long term solution to me.

      • @saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        I’d be surprised if it lasted longer than any other socially progressive trend. A few weeks, tops, with largest proportions falling off in the first week.

        This is the reality of social momentum these days. Resistance is no threat because it has extremely brief lifespan before moving onto the next thing to be a part of.

        • @YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 months ago

          I agree but not because it’s “trends” but because this system forces us to have short attention spans by presenting us with a massive deluge of information about horrible things happening everywhere (many of which are caused either directly or indirectly by that very system) so we have basically no choice but to keep shifting our focus and updating our threat assessments or risk becoming totally overwhelmed and falling behind or burning out.

          • @Szyler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            I instinctively closed your comment after reading “short attention span” because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.

      • @suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It also won’t work since the service has enough precision to know whether you go in, and for how long. The real issue is that mobile phones are continuously broadcasting their location to any device that wants to listen, even if you turn wifi and bluetooth off.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    1095 months ago

    It drives me nuts how our economic system is making not having a cell phone increasingly difficult. Many necessary things won’t even work on a tablet. The smartphone is the most amazing futuristic device I dreamed about that has evolved into a distopian nightmare.

    • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      It is only dystopian because we have not taken back the power to control our devices. We of course need some serious privacy laws to allow this to happen. Right now is the defining moment for the 21st century. Will we take control of our technology or be enslaved by it?

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        I don’t see smartphones being better unless they are completely different. Since its basically iphone and an iphone mimic and its just the way the whole ecosystems are built. Like you can install a free smartphone os but you will not be able to do things with it at the same level as someone without one as far as corps and stuff.

        • @Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          This was part of the fictional operating system in the book Little Brother. I think it inspired similar features in a particular real life Linux build too

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        instead of blocking advertising data, we should embrace it IMO.

        imagine a world where users shove so much information at these tools that they can’t even tell what’s real or not. camouflage works better when everyone participates.

        There’s an ad blocker that does exactly this. Called Ad Nauseam. Chrome blocked it from their store super fast, then blocked it from being installed in Chrome from 3rd party sites, then blocked known versions of it from being manually installed in developer mode. I used to run it set to a low percentage - if I “clicked” every ad they’d know to throw my data out, but if I click say 3% of them…

      • @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        that’s by design.

        See also: automobiles. Automobiles and smartphones certainly have strong cases for how utilitarian they are. They are both genuinely very useful.

        But the expectation that everyone has one, along with them becoming practically a requirement for most people, has turned them into a dependency and a means of control. Some people can manage to forgo them, but you almost have to build your life around doing so.

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    Hard to connect these dots for most “normal” folks without feeling like a conspiracy nut. Appreciate this journalism.

  • @fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    Apple and Google can fix the problem. Apps are required to ask for permission to access location information. Most of the time, it’s for tracking and analytics, not anything related to the app’s functionality. That’s the data that is leaking to these data brokers.

    In those cases, if asked, user can say no, but apps keep haranguing you until you capitulate.

    Instead, the OS could add a button that says: “Yes, but randomize.” After that, location data is returned as normal, but from totally random locations nearby. They could even spoof the data clustering algorithms and just pick some rando location and keep showing returns to them, or just trade the data from one random phone for another every N days.

    You do this enough and the data will become polluted enough to become useless.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Tower dats i guess is harder to get as it requires a warrant?

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        Unless you become a phone company or use a StingRay

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Well i meant why wouldn’t telco sell or provide it to the feds?

          • Optional
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            If they get a warrant, sure. Sell it I dunno. There’s more legal cases about cell tower data simply because it’s some form of technology courts have at least made an effort to understand at some point.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              Well we know telco sells your traffic data as ISP as “anonymized” i dont see how they are not doing this with tower data but i am not familair with case law on the issue.

              So maybe there is some legal bar to that…

              Amazing how warrant got turned into a joke in modern age tho all within last 30 years.

    • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      I don’t think this would be technically useful to prevent exploitation of location data. The handset always has to identify to a tower using the SIM card, which is going to identify the phone and its user. Your cellular service provider can still sell this information to data brokers.

      With that said, I would love the option to lie about my location to apps that have no business knowing it.

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Because a carrier’s data on you is not your person or belongings. The companies holding this data are selling access to it, so it’s not being searched, it’s being offered.

      In other words, the same reason as why they don’t need a search warrant if there’s a breaking and the business across the street volunteers their security camera footage, even if you’re on that footage.

      • @PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Courts have actually said that looking back at someone’s location data counts as a search and requires a warrant. There’s currently a lawsuit recently filed by the institute for justice aledging that the use of flock safety license plate readers is unconstitutional because it’s a warrantless search.

    • @laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Or just hit airplane mode / power off. Or just leave the phone at home, the procedure takes only 5-10 minutes.

      People are way to attached to their phones. The world will not collapse in that hour, it is a survivable event, or so I hear from reputable sources.

      • @mx_smith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Can you really trust airplane mode to ensure there is nothing going out. I agree people should just leave them at home, but these bags are like putting tape over your laptop camera. Just an extra peace of mind when going to the Dr.

        • @laverabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          I probably wouldn’t trust airplane mode, but I do believe power off is safe. There is no transmit capability in off correct?

          But yeah, leaving phone at home is best knowing tracking sites like these exist.

          • @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            It has been know for at least a decade, I think, that the GSM chip could still contact cell towers while the phone was powered off. I’m sure its successor hasn’t lost that capability.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      I didn’t read the article, but wouldn’t the site see the phone as soon as it’s taken out of the bag? Unless the plan is to leave the phone in the bag the whole time, at which point it seems easier to just leave it behind.

      • Mayor Poopington
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Pretty much. Can’t see the rest of the article, but most likely it’s just tower data, which only gives a general location. But as soon as you pull your phone out and get messages you would be traceable. Kind of defeats the purpose of having a phone

        • @ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          I’ll admit I didn’t open the article, as far as I’m aware the best way to sidestep silly requirements like warrants is to just purchase data intended for advertising. Databrokers really have an amazing wealth of info ready to be tapped into, all you gotta do is pay.

  • capital
    link
    fedilink
    English
    275 months ago

    Don’t bring your phone.

    Get a burner and set up call forwarding.

    • @RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      265 months ago

      burner goes from your house, to abortion clinic, to your office, back to your house

      Hmm, must be someone else, I don’t recognize this number

      -The Government

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        You really can’t think of a solution to this?

        • @Jtotheb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 months ago

          You really think you came up with an airtight solution to device tracking that nobody in the industry has considered on a whim?

          • capital
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            Ok how’s the industry tracking a phone with no power?

            • @Jtotheb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              205 months ago

              That was possible over a decade ago.

              Link Link Link Link

              Also to be clear, you suggested that you bring a burner phone and set up call forwarding. That implies a phone that’s on. If you’re carrying a burner phone that’s off, I do have a novel solution, just don’t bring it

              • @midnightblue@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                55 months ago

                No that’s not easily possible on every phone. It’s a specifically crafted FakeOff malware, used by the NSA for targeted attacks. This is not something that just randomly gets deployed on every phone, it’s only used against individual targets. Use GrapheneOS to harden your Android device as much as possible, to defend against such malware getting installed in the first place.

                You really think the NSA will get involved to track someone who wants to get an abortion?

                That was possible over a decade ago.

                You know what also existed over a decade ago? Faraday bags. This concept of physics isn’t new.

                Just stop spreading fear and misinformation.

                • @Jtotheb@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  05 months ago

                  Yes, yes. If you want to avoid being tracked by the government buy a Faraday bag. Thank you for the valuable information. I’m in awe.

                • @Zink@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  You really think the NSA will get involved to track someone who wants to get an abortion?

                  Probably not, unless it’s an exceptional case where they are already interested for another reason.

                  But if, say, county sheriffs across the country also got access, I would be surprised if I didn’t hear about women’s and doctors’ lives being ruined by them.

              • capital
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Hm. I said without power. Not switched off.

                Judging by the upvotes you’re far from the only one who forgot about simply removing the battery.

                I suggested no power but not for the entire trip. Put the battery in when you’re sufficiently far from your house so as not to be associated with it. Remove it again when you’re sufficiently close to your house.

                Use your imagination. It helps.

                • @Jtotheb@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  You know, we can talk about how batteries aren’t removable in most phones anymore, about whether or not the act of suddenly buying prepaid phones isn’t itself incriminating, any number of factors, but I really only replied to you because you were rude, not because I wanted to talk about it.

              • capital
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Keep reading the thread. I’ve already addressed this.

                Really getting confused as to how people read “no power” and think “phone off” instead of “no power”.

    • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Then how you gonna take a selfie in the bed?

      Seriously tho, people need phones for everything, including their calendar and map and communication with their partner.

      Not bringing a phone isn’t an option

        • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Yes, you can. But thats the last thing on the mind of someone who is struggling to terminate a pregnancy in the US in 2024. We need something better.

            • @T156@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              35 months ago

              There are many reasons for a pregnancy to be terminated, and not all of them are for fun, or because of casual sex. Maybe the child has defects incompatible with life, or the mother is not capable of carrying to term, and attempting to do so will kill them both.

              People don’t tend to go “oh, it’s a nice Sunday today. I think I’ll pop by the abortion clinic.”

      • ivanafterall ☑️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        If you want maximum privacy, you gotta nix that partner and, really, the communication. Shit, I’ve already said too much.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Not bringing a phone definitely is an option.

        But I suggested a burner with forwarding so that handles comms to partner.

        If you can’t function without your main device for special circumstances such as this, I guess you just can’t be helped.

      • Wren
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        I can assure you that people don’t need instant access to calendars and maps. Smart phones are a convenience, not a necessity.

        (Source - lived through the 80’s. Still alive to tell the tale)

          • Wren
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            No, they don’t. Because if they’re weak enough to allow themselves to become addicted to a device, that’s their problem to solve. Not even else’s.

            Smartphones are a convince, a tool. Nothing more. If one can’t live without one- there’s a problem needing to be addressed.

            • @frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              if they’re weak enough to allow themselves to become addicted to a device

              That’s not how addiction works.

      • @WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Mapquest is still around, so that solves one problem. The rest can be alleviated by communicating in person with your partner and aligning on a plan to not get tracked (like partner driving you and leaving their phone at home).

        In the absence of that help, friends or family you trust. A cab? The clinic probably has a phone to hail a cab when you’re there.

        Disclaimer: I’m just providing work arounds, I’m not saying they’re ideal.

      • @basmati@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        There are alternatives to all of that. If you’re going to do potentially illegal acts, and you don’t want to rot in jail for the next however many decades until a scotus exists to set you free, take basic operational security into account and don’t bring the corporate tracking device that cops can freely tap into.

          • @basmati@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -55 months ago

            That’s cute but to get those laws you have to vote third party and hope they don’t get killed or bribed before passing said law. I don’t see that happening until long after the US collapses, so in the meantime it makes more sense to understand how not to be a victim to a fascist government.

            • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -15 months ago

              In the US, yes. But this is mainstream in countries with democracies.

              Anyway, of course. Stein or West or youre voting for climate catastrophe, privacy erosion, and genocide.

              • @basmati@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -25 months ago

                The opposite, actually, they’re the only candidates, assuming you meant Stein and Claudia, that do not have any of that in their policies.

      • @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        Calendar

        Non digital is sufficient. And if it must be digital for some reason, no you don’t specifically need to use a serf phone for that.

        map

        I get around just fine without proprietary tracking BS. Navit + Openstreetmaps pre-downloaded binary data + detachable USB GPS transceiver.

        communication with partner

        Softphones and SIP telephony are fine for this.

        Sauce: I am a functioning adult who lives without a phone as a matter of principle.

  • @Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    335 months ago

    a device that constantly connects to antennas all over the place, is used to track your location.

    who would have thought?

    if you dont wanna get tracked - dont bring your phone.

    • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Or we could get rights protecting us from this. Especially considering that that’s a reasonable interpretation of the fourth amendment and the ninth amendment.

    • @MattMatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Meanwhile when I turn off Bluetooth on my iPhone it says “for the next y hours” and there’s no option to turn it off permanently.

    • @WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      Wouldn’t just keeping your phone in a metal box prevent it from communicating with anything? Keep your phone in a metal box and only take it out when you need it. Only take it out in a location that isn’t sensitive. Or hell, just make a little sleeve out of aluminum foil. Literally just wrapping your phone in aluminum foil should prevent it from connecting to anything. A tinfoil hat won’t serve as an effective Faraday cage for your brain, but fully wrapping your phone in aluminum foil should do the job. Even better, as it’s a phone, such a foil sleeve should be quite testable. Build it, put your phone in it, and try texting and calling it. If surrounded fully by a conductive material, the phone should be completely incapable of sending or receiving signals.

        • @WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You sure it’s still not phoning home? How do you know “off” is really “off” anymore with a modern phone? It’s not like an old flip phone that you can just pop the battery out. Sure it sounds paranoid, but we’re literally talking about something that used to be the realm of crackpots and cranks - “the government is tracking all of us 24/7!” Well, it seems that’s actually literally the case now.

            • @WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              185 months ago

              The iPhone remote locator function still works when the phone is powered off. It doesn’t work when the battery is completely dead, but it does work when the phone is supposedly “powered off.” This is irrefutable proof that iPhones at least retain some of their functions even when you’ve “turned them off.”

              • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -125 months ago

                This is where paranoia comes into play. That’s Apple’s information. Not anyone else’s. If you believe Apple is selling it to this company and ignoring the phone setting that enables it then use the faraday bag.

                But this company is not getting that information directly. It gets your information from cell tower pings at best, and social media scraping at worst.

            • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              35 months ago

              I don’t want to encourage paranoia here but “off” does not mean “off”. Modern phones are almost never actually “powered down”. If you’re paranoid, turning your phone off is not enough. Leave it behind.

              (Also a gap in your phone’s location history can also be used against you, fwiw.)

      • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        A Faraday cage is supposed to be grounded, so aluminum foil isn’t the same thing. Maybe you could turn the phone off, wrap it in foil, and then place it upon a conductive metal surface that is grounded, such as a 240v kitchen appliance

    • @moseschrute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      There has to be some way that we could have created the architecture to do everything a phone does without letting a user be triangulated easily.

      I know there is no incentive to do that, but it amazes me how far ahead the security of the web is compared to phone tech.

      Like maybe if phones could authenticate without broadcasting a unique identifier. And maybe they could open a vpn style encrypted tunnel and perform their auth over that tunnel.

      Idk, I know nothing about phones, but it has to be possible.

    • @wrekone@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      335 months ago

      If you don’t want to be tracked illegally, don’t bring your phone.

      If you don’t want any to be tracked legally, write/call/tweet/visit your representatives.

      • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 months ago

        Also just write your Supreme Court and ask them how this isn’t a flagrant violation of the intent of the fourth amendment. Seriously the founding fathers would be asking what the fuck about this. They weren’t good people but they would’ve been privacy nuts.

        • @pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          if you’re talking about the supreme court, as in the SCOTUS, they’re long past pretending they give the slightest fuck about the bill of rights.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The US Supreme Court has had an antagonistic relationship to the forth and fifth amendments to the Constitution of the United States since before I was a kid in the 1970s since they often interfered with efforts to round up nonwhites. But after the 9/11 attacks and the PATRIOT ACT, SCOTUS has been shredding both amendments with carve-out exceptions.

          Then Law Enforcement uses tech without revealing it in court, often lying ( parallel reconstruction ) to conceal questionable use, and the courts give them the benefit of the doubt.

    • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Or, you know, let the gov work for you, not against you, & fully expect people to get jailed if they track you.

      It’s a matter of perspective what the minimum standard should be.

      Especially when a personal device like a phone is basically necessary for a normal life and even public services.

              • @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -15 months ago

                A millennial not having a cell phone is such an unimaginable concept?

                For whatever it’s worth, I do use SIP software telephony in order to make calls and receive texts, so in that way I do technically have a “phone”. But what I’m fundamentally rejecting here is the notion that I must be compelled to carry around a device in my pocket infested with proprietary malware.

        • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 months ago

          You can answer this yourself. Get rid of your phone and see. If you beleive it’s not a necessity, don’t say “yeah I could do these alternative things to get by”. Actually do it. I hope you’re not job-shopping

          • @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            The above being a rhetorical question, I just wanted to take a temperature of the room.

            I have lived without a phone pretty much all my adult life. The experiment for me would be to get a phone and see what changes. In that way, I have answered it for myself and the answer is a clear “you don’t need a phone”.

        • bitwolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Considering nearly everything requires a phone number and also rejects VoIP numbers? Yes. A phone is required now to participate in society.

          • @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            You and I must live in two different societies then. I work with at least two other individuals who also don’t have a cell phone (not just smart phone, but any cellular device), one of whom is also a millennial. My SIP number has never had any issues with online service auth.

        • TonyOstrich
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 months ago

          Unfortunately yes, and I would go even a step further and say a smart phone is a basic necessity. More and more companies and even government services are operating on the assumption that everyone has a smart phone. I have encountered various services where if a person didn’t have a smart phone they literally can’t use it. I even have personal experience with it.

          My landlord uses a company for payments that can only be interacted with via an app on a smart phone. There is no web portal option. There is no option to mail a check. There is no option to setup a direct bank transfer. I was essentially strong armed into it since the place itself was (and still is) better than almost anything else I saw and is a reasonable price.

            • TonyOstrich
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Are we talking about me specifically or people in general? I’ll assume general as I was just relaying a personal anecdote to show that my point/thesis wasn’t just a hypothetical as I do know how to get around it in my specific case.

              In the general context, that’s not a great solution for most people as it is beyond their skill or time set. For the most disadvantaged people just having the ability to have a phone at all and a place to reliably charge it is an issue. There is also the issue is practicality. When I take public transit where I live, the app pulls up a QR code on my phone they gets scanned. I’m not even sure I could fit my laptop screen into the space to scan the QR code if I was emulating Android.

              So I guess my thesis here is that systems should be made more accessible and inclusive rather than requiring those in the minority to either have to put more effort in using a workaround to reach functional parity or end up left out all together.

            • @LordCrom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              65 months ago

              Gov agencies require 2 factor to a cell phone. Land lines dont work and VoIP lines with texting also don’t work. The only option is to use snail mail and have sensitive data sent via post office

              • @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -35 months ago

                If I were stuck in that position, then I would not hesitate to choose the postage method. That being an option does not comport with the assertion “if a person didn’t have a smart phone they literally can’t use it”.

                • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I respect your stubbornness in that regard, but understand that in such a situation you’re putting yourself in a position of significant friction, possibly costing yourself income, promotions etc.

                  I learned very quickly by playing the game by the unofficial rules and expectations things are way easier and my quality of life is much improved. Stubbornness won’t change the system, but it will certainly annoy people and slow down your access to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness. If that’s a trade off you’re willing to make so be it, but personally I’d rather enjoy my life than die on hills that very few people so much as glance at.

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Depends on where you are really. Small towns everything is cash or a phonecall to a person from any phone (it’s really like stepping back in time about 15 years) but in larger cities you might find yourself required to use an app to unlock your apartment or office door or buy a train ticket or pay for a parking space, or buy a bus ticket or hail a taxi. In work I’ve needed a phone for 2FA in my last 3 jobs (granted in IT that’s probably for the best) and in college they distribute resources on the school website via big in-person QR codes.

          While every single one of those things almost always has a non-smartphone option, it increases friction significantly, and then you’re the annoying person who is slowing everything down by not doing something the way everyone else does, however in a workplace they’ll often simply provide you with a phone because that’s easier than going to the trouble of ensuring every edgecase is covered and ensuring fair compensation for requiring you to have a phone.

        • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 months ago

          Yes, imho, and increasingly so.
          In an environment where the vast majority has one people act like everyone has one (eg restaurants having qr links to menus).

          Even EU ruled as much (eg my company phone is my own personal device regardless of ownership & my privacy is protected differently than eg my work PC or laptop).

          And even if this wasn’t the case, why would you need to opt out of having a mobile phone just to get basic privacy?

  • John Richard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    365 months ago

    As people get ready to vote here in the US, one issue I haven’t even heard brought up is the lack of privacy regulations in the US. Do most people not care if the person they’re voting for is fine with every corporation selling and sharing personal data?

    • @Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      Privacy regulations are to the left of the Overton window. The idea that corporations don’t have some divinely ordained ownership of our personal data is unthinkably radical.

    • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      Omg there’s soo many critically important issues that never even get brought up.

      Like shutting down the nuclear arsenal, defunding the military and police, establishing a carbon tax, making carbon extraction illegal, establishing UBI. All of these basic policies never even get discussed on mainstream media and it drives me crazy.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 months ago

      Our electoral system results in a choice between two candidates, and both are fine with it.

      • @itsJoelle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        And more over the electorate is calcified along party lines where the outcomes for either side is perceived as being stark and dire. I suspect this means concerns like these might get stifled even if it is held by both parties.

      • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I was just traveling in the UK and I had this discussion more than once having to explain why our options are always terrible and ignoring issues voters want addressed.

    • GHiLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      It’s such a non-problem to my family members that if I even suggest it is a problem, I get ignored.

      No one cares. It’s either nothing anyone values or they figured they never had any privacy to begin with.

  • @reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    975 months ago

    Start tracking politician phones. Oh look who paid a visit to the lobbyist house this week! That shit will get shut down real quick.

      • @pingveno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        All politicians meet with lobbyists. It’s hard to get a handle on the needs of the nation (or state, or so on), and lobbying is how people inform their representatives of that need. Now whether those lobbyists are scumbags or saints, that’s a different question.

    • @wrekone@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If you don’t want to be tracked illegally, don’t bring your phone.

      If you don’t want any to be tracked legally, write/call/tweet/visit your representatives.

      edit: responded to the wrong comment

      • @trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        Ah yes, democracy is a healthy and fully functioning institution.

        You just got confused who’s sponsoring it, that’s understandable.

          • @trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            05 months ago

            Throw it down and bring real democracy like in Switzerland

            Or throw it down and bring anarchism

            None of these are realistic, so…

        • @wrekone@lemmyf.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I see your point. I have no illusions that democracy is healthy in modern times. Perhaps not ever? We don’t even live in a democracy any more, we live in a corporatocracy.

          But doing nothing will solve nothing.

          edited to add: In fact, it’s our complacency that our corporate masters depend on. Corporate news is designed to overwhelm you. Advertising is designed to lull you to sleep. Together, they make it seem like there’s nothing you can do. But that’s not true. You can do something. Maybe not the things I suggested, but something. It will make a difference, even if it only makes a small difference for a few people. Isn’t that better than nothing?

      • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        If you don’t want any to be tracked legally, write/call/tweet/visit your representatives.

        And donate to the EFF if you have the means because they can and have and will likely continue to lobby on average internet users behalf!