Right now, on Stack Overflow, Luigi Magione’s account has been renamed. Despite having fruitfully contributed to the network he is stripped of his name and his account is now known as “user4616250”.

This appears to violate the creative commons license under which Stack Overflow content is posted.

When the author asked about this:

As of yet, Stack Exchange has not replied to the above post, but they did promptly and within hours gave me a year-long ban for merely raising the question. Of course, they did draft a letter which credited the action to other events that occurred weeks before where I merely upvoted contributions from Luigi and bountied a few of his questions.

  • @FolknForage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “No wars but class wars” as true today as when Trotsky said it many decades ago. Not sure how anyone cannot see this very, very clear fact, made self evident by the treatment of Luigi and the composition of the upcoming administration and its supporters.

    But every other commoner that sees it needs to take according measures.

    Culture is not our friend.

    • CodexArcanum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      502 months ago

      “Censorship forced me to flee a pro-nazi site to another pro-nazi site,” is a contradiction worth noting. It highlights the general pro-nazi vibe going around big tech.

  • @Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    Reducing someone to a number has never backfired in a revolutionary way. Just ask prisoner 24601

  • @WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1282 months ago

    By this logic, everyone charged (not convicted, just charged) should have their accounts and submissions changed in the same manner as Luigi’s.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      602 months ago

      Man I sure wish this’d mean all Trump-generated content and speeches got deleted. That’d be genuinely helpful to the world at least…

      • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        292 months ago

        The presumption or admission of guilt does not and should not justify violating the Creative Commons License, nor perpetrating any illegal behavior agains any individual(s).

        If JK Rowling went out and robbed a bank, or murdered an ex-Husband, in no world or timeline would that give a member of her publishing company the right to scratch out her name from any of her books and replace it with their own or someone else’s.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          should not justify violating the Creative Commons License

          Absolutely. Even a guilty verdict shouldn’t justify violating the Creative Commons License. It should either be completely taken down/hidden, or left in-tact.

          That’s not at all what I’m saying though though, I’m saying that it’s reasonable for the site to take action to hide the account. He’s a public figure with an apparent confession, which is going to attract a lot of attention to that account that otherwise wouldn’t be there. They shouldn’t have done it this way since it violates the Creative Commons License, but I am saying that action to hide/disable the account is warranted.

          • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Another comment way down claims it’s standard operating procedure for social media sites to disable/hide and account of a highly publicized murderer, particularly during investigations. However, the provided no examples nor sources or technical documents that detail this as something that is genuinely done as a standard procedure.

            I’m kinda gonna do my own research on that, but I feel the validity of Stack’s actions would to some degree depend on the results of researching that claim, and whether or not that is true.

            It’s kinda difficult to research something like that though when most highly publicized murders predated social media in its current form, so it would be hard to have a lot of examples despite there being a decent number of people who fit the bill, ironically.

          • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            So far, all I’ve found is a 2018 publication by the Police Executive Research Forum, entitled “The Changing Nature of Crime And Criminal Investigations”. It’s a 67 page document, and I’m curious to see if it discusses how their investigation tactics may have changed, and if so, whether the aforementioned tactic is mentioned as being included.

            • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I didn’t find anything. But I also work 40 plus hours a week, so that doesn’t necessarily mean there’s not something out there. But it’s more likely the case that this might not be true, from what I know.

  • poo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 months ago

    Stack Overflow fucking sucks, it’s dead.

      • @vane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        The next thing seems to be the discord (or any instant messenger ) channel for the project. That’s my wild guess. I don’t like it but looks like people are shifting from the web to instant communicators, so the knowledge is not perserved.
        Thanks AI

  • @Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1632 months ago

    What can Stack Overflow’s motivation possibly be to strip Luigi’s account? Are their private equity owners in cahoots with health insurance executives?

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1522 months ago

      A connection I may be inventing comes to mind: all the CEOs making million dollar donations to the new administration in the US.

      Basically, show you’re on the side of “law and order” and hope you’re not caught up in any purges.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      It’s pretty standard when a highly-publicized murder suspect’s online profiles are discovered. Platform admins will typically disable/hide their accounts from the public while investigations/trials are ongoing. This is hardly unique to Luigi.

  • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    Here’s a fun fact I just recently came across. In the medieval times when the church wanted to remove a heretic, someone who was speaking out in opposition to church doctrine, they would burn those people at the stake. The reason they would do this was not because this was a common practice to burn people at the stake but in order to prevent relics of the heretics from being collected and giving their followers something to rally around.

    I think Luigi’s Stack Overflow history is a relic of his existence and something people could rally around and the powerful don’t want that to exist.

    • @rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      532 months ago

      “Trickle down economics only occurs when the wealthy bleed.”

      Similar, and appropriate. The working class will only benefit once the wealthy are no longer wealthy.

    • @Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 months ago

      Plus AI is actually happy to answer your random questions, with an immediate response. Stack overflow will quickly become obsolete as AI gets better

        • @bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          AI is going to get worse, while stack overflow will be superceded by better resources in the future.

          It would be pretty neat if Sal Kahn created an alternative, but that’s very different from his existing project.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      I got a decade old question closed as a duplicate.

    • CodexArcanum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 months ago

      I also stopped posting there years ago for much the same reason. You could feel the strangulation of the community as duplicate questions started getting shouted down, posts got turned into “community wikis” against your will and your own questions started getting edited to better fit someone else’s plans and ideologies. The company was sold shortly after, so maybe animals can sense their pending extinction (some of them anyway)?

      I miss those days when writing an answer genuinely felt like helping to grow the global community of friend developers. It’s a shame no technology has been discovered that will let the small amount of collective good in us all work together against the assholes, but alas it seems the opposite is always true.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        The company was sold shortly after, so maybe animals can sense their pending extinction (some of them anyway)?

        More likely the changes were made to improve the “saleability” of the website.

        I miss those days when writing an answer genuinely felt like helping to grow the global community of friend developers.

        One of the promises of the internet was, supposedly, that it couldn’t really be monopolized because the barriers to entry were so low. But what we’ve seen is the influence of the Networking Effect as a means of consolidating user bases, combined with a cartel-style censorship that limits the degree to which word-of-mouth can influence a nascent community’s growth.

        And now the AI comes to fully alienate us from each other, leaving even the more token communities with a “am I talking to a real person or a computer facsimile” lingering dread with each passing year.

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        your own questions started getting edited to better fit someone else’s plans and ideologies

        That hits hard for me. Not that someone changed the spirit of my answer but that someone completely reworded it without my permission. It was almost like they were trying to steal my idea without running afoul of copyright or something.

      • @manicdave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 months ago

        What’s even more annoying is when their refinements end up putting an objectively wrong answer as the authoritative record.

        I found a question where someone new to electronics was how to get more current from a USB power supply.

        The “correct” answer that was posted before the question was closed was that a source can’t limit current and the questioner should learn more about electricity.

        The actual correct answer - and probably what the questioner was looking for - is to short the data lines together because a compliant USB charger will only supply 500mA by default, not it’s stated max current.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 months ago

          What drives me mad is when a question is closed as a duplicate, and when you look at the duplicate it’s either for a different version of the product and thus the answer isn’t relevant, or the question straight up wasn’t answered there either.

      • GreatAlbatross
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        “How do I get this working in 22.04?”

        “Previous question answers this.” Tagged as best answer

        “No, the previous question answers it with a method that was removed in 22.04”

        silence

    • @interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s 40% assholes People who delete “Hi,” From the first line of the question Because a modicum of politeness and humanity is inefficient And don’t get me started about the XY problem solvers Stack exchange gamifies rudeness and dismissiveness.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -22 months ago

      You can just ask an AI anyway since it’s training set will basically just be stackoverflow.

      • @drspod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 months ago

        Just tried this and the AI told me my question was a duplicate and my post was removed.

      • @sus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        the entirety of stackoverflow is not enough data to make the AI work properly. They need terabytes of text, stackoverflow has about 50-100GB of useful data at most

  • Destide
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 months ago

    Stack being weird and toxic I’m shocked, shocked I tell you

  • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 months ago

    Is there a mirror for Stacks content? I’ve been concerned for some time that they are a vital resource that a corporation could ruin at any moment.

      • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        I’ve looked into this but they aren’t exactly small, it’s not a straightforward operation for even the average developer or systems engineer to restore these into a working format.

        I was thinking we need something along the lines of a read only public mirror run by the proper open source community - e.g. SourceForge or a major Linux project… ISP’s and universities offer mirrors of Linux packages so this could be a resource offered in the same vein. That’s my line of thinking as far as a StackOverflow mirror goes anyway!

        • @486@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Of course they aren’t small, but they are probably as small as it gets, since they are pretty efficiently compressed. I am not sure what you mean by

          it’s not a straightforward operation for even the average developer or systems engineer to restore these into a working format

          since it is really trivial to use them. Just load them with Kiwix and serve them as a website. It doesn’t get much easier than that.

          • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I was referring to the file size being the barrier. The 2024 large database size of 202GB is prohibitive for the average person’s resource capabilities. i.e. I have a home VPS host and I don’t even have that much free space. Your cloud operating costs would also go up with the storage and bandwidth use.

            There’s also two separate issues I was kinda mixing up. I’m a developer who uses StackOverflow and would like to use a resource that is readily available. I think it’d take a few hours to setup even a smaller copy of SO, which isn’t ideal for answering a quick question. I also don’t want to setup a whole mirror site with custom work just for myself and because I’m paranoid Microsoft miight buy them and paywall SO overnight or something.

            • @486@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              When hosting this locally, I don’t see how 200 GB is much of an issue. Storage is so cheap these days, if you want to host it locally, just buy a 256 GB SSD just for that data for $20. Anyway, you were asking for a mirror, to which I replied with the information about the ZIM files. I don’t really understand the issue. Stackoverflow just isn’t that small, there is not much you can do about that.

              I think it’d take a few hours to setup even a smaller copy of SO, which isn’t ideal for answering a quick question.

              The download? Maybe, depends on your Internet connection’s speed. Actually serving it as a website certainly doesn’t take hours. It is rather a matter of seconds.

            • CodexArcanum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              7
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I looked into doing something similar with Wikipedia and the recommendation is also to use Kiwix, and the offline file size is also very large.

              Welcome to the collapse! Hoarding “clean data” for personal use is like hoarding clean water and food: you need a place to keep it, and it starts going stale the minute you shelve it. So either buy a digital bunker to load up with what you need or ask the all knowing AI gods for answers like the other poors.

              Also the Stack Exchange software used to be open source, surely there’s still a fork somewhere. You could certainly run your own Developer QA site, but like with Lemmy, the problem then is getting enough traffic to be able to productively tap into the collective wisdom.

              (Edit: sorry, this comes across mean spirited but I’m honestly sympathetic and just nihilisticallly frustrated to be in a similar situation. I foresee a big NAS and a lot of downloads in my future, but I hope we also find ways to share our forbidden knowledge until the day it can be free again)

              • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                I’m hoping community efforts are able to fill the void. I fear having to do this all myself and becoming some kind of Mad Max style tinkerer after the fall…

                Old phones daisy changed together to act as a server… The remnants of StarLink for internet, getting nazi/rape threats from the remaining social media AI that live in all the satellites…

                It would be nice if government backed up Wikipedia and SO. But considering they don’t give a shit about Linux which is arguably one of the most vital technical infrastructure projects of our lifetime…