This headline was literally my first out-loud laugh of the day. I love it.

Meta has denied directly lobbying on the TikTok ban, but the company spent a record sum lobbying in 2024, including on “Homeland Security” topics. In March 2022, the Washington Post reported that Meta paid a firm called Targeted Victory to push the narrative that TikTok is dangerous to children. And Zuckerberg himself has spent the last five years painting a picture to Congress that his monopolistic company faces great competition, actually, from Chinese companies and more importantly from China itself. This story has served Meta extraordinarily well, as he has been able to distract from Meta’s myriad privacy violations and monopolistic actions by saying it would be worse if China wins. Meta is not a monopoly, he says. It is a company fighting on behalf of America against China and Chinese companies for the soul of the internet.

“Ooh, China bad, don’t pay attention to all the evil we do.” Jackass.

  • Sculptus Poe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1052 months ago

    Why is Meta lobbying at all? Why does any private entity have the ear of presidents and congress? This is a fundamental problem with the system as a whole.

    • @CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 months ago

      The foxes have been in the henhouse for a while. But now they don’t need to hide anymore. The American oligarchy can finally shed its masks and go full-on Russia 2.0.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Why is Meta lobbying at all?

      They want to influence public policy for their benefit.

      Why does any private entity have the ear of presidents and congress?

      A large part of politics is balancing the needs of different groups.

    • @SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      Don’t forget about Party Whips, Jerrymandering, and Campaign Contributions! There’s a whole slew of reasons why our democracies have gotten fucked up! Not a lot of answers on how to fix 'em, though

      • Sculptus Poe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Well, that might be the case, but I’ve only been fed tons of posts on FB that were pretty anti-Israel way too far in the other direction. That can’t be the main issue…

  • @Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    No one can actually have a billionaire by the balls, even if they’re another billionaire. It’s kind of the whole point of being a billionaire.

    Pretty much their only weakness is literally everyone else deciding billionaires shouldn’t exist, and working together to make that happen.

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Trump has the power (shortly) to direct his anger at companies in ways that do let him have zuck by the balls.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Just look at the Russian model, that’s what Trump wants to do.

      You can only be a billionaire, if you do what the authoritarians want. Otherwise you get arrested or pushed out a window and they absorb all your assets… I don’t think all of these US billionaires thought this through to be honest.

      • @futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        A lot of them have been going to Mar a Lago to kiss the ring. So it looks like they have thought it through.

  • Sundray
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 months ago

    That’s only fair, since Zuckerberg has a deathgrip on Trumps ass with his lips.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    pretty sure it’s the other way around; big tech and their billionaires have trump like a puppet on a string.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Most of big tech actually falls under the TikTok ban possibility. He may have lobbied for it but Congress put him square in the cross hairs. So Trump effectively has a veto on Zuckerberg owning Meta.

  • @rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Meanwhile go watch Youtubers vacationing in China, a lot fo the narrative we’re being fed is BS.

    Not all of it mind you…

  • Sticky Fedi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Trump: *gives Musk favour*

    Teh Zuck: Wat about me daddy UwU