AI Summary:

Tesla’s 2024 financial results were disappointing, with several key points highlighted:

  • Automotive Revenues: Fell by 8% in Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023, totaling $19.8 billion.
  • Energy and Storage Revenues: More than doubled, growing by 113% to $3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Services: Grew by 31% in Q4 2024, contributing $2.8 billion.
  • Total Revenue: Increased by 2% in Q4 2024, but income fell by 23%, with an operating margin of 6.2%.
  • Net Profits: Dropped by 71% to $2.3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Annual Performance: Automotive revenues decreased by 6% to $77 billion in 2024. Energy generation and storage increased by 67% to $10 billion. Services grew by 27%, bringing in $10.5 billion.
  • Gross Profits: Fell by 1%, with net profits dropping by 53% to $7.1 billion for the year.
  • Free Cash Flow: Decreased by 18% to $3.6 billion.
  • Regulatory Credits: $2.8 billion of profit came from selling regulatory credits, not from core business activities.
  • Future Predictions: Tesla expects energy storage revenues to grow by at least 50% year-over-year and aims to grow automotive sales by more than 60% in 2025.

Despite the poor financial results, Tesla’s share price increased by 103% over the same period.

  • @snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 months ago

    That’s ok, I’m sure a big government bailout is on the horizon for JUST the struggling, American EV auto maker, because their CEO sucked the president’s dick the best.

    • @SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      They have $3.6B in free cash flow. This is just a decrease from last year, which was a record, to this year, a year in which new car sales outside of China are massively down everywhere.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        Also remember that Tesla owns I think just shy of 10K Bitcoins that actually allowed its numbers this quarter by $600 million. And the way Trump has his minions pulling all crypto regulations look for Tesla to exploit it to the max going forward. Maybe they’ll even buy some $TRUMP coins and announce $ELON coins for foreign entities looking to launder money destined for the White House.

        Source: CNBC: Tesla Reports $600 Million Profit

      • @snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Again, more reason for baby musk to cry at baby trump about how it isn’t fair and he NEEEDS American tax dollars to fight the China EV invasion.

      • @Viri4thus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Teslas are objectively trash. 1 out of 3 model 3s didn’t pass the mandatory inspection in Denmark 4y after purchase which results in tje cars becoming very expensive paper weights given how expensive it is to repair the modal issues. I’m amazed these data weren’t more divulged by media since they come from the Danish state.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1732 months ago

    Value investing is basically dead, isn’t it? Am I crazy? How can you objectively evaluate a company’s value, notice it is undervalued, and then trade accordingly when price action does not even slightly track the company’s value?

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      That’s not new to Tesla. Avoid bubble stocks. Avoid penny stocks. Buy “stodgy”

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        I’m not into Tesla stock. I’m not just here to whine about a single stock not doing what I want, it’s that I think price action in general is too irrational. I’ve got an axe to grind here and it goes beyond which stocks to pick.

        Huge ETFs and algorithmic trading makes too many tickers move all the same way. This harms price discovery. And don’t get me started on off-exchange trading; This month, off-exchange volume exceeded that of lit markets.

    • @SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -121 month ago

      There’s value investing and there’s speculation. If Tesla can make a robot that can mop the floor, even this seemingly ridiculous valuation will look like a bargain. Have to remember, Tesla is not a car company. They are an AI and green tech company. Cars are just their largest activity to date.

      I am concerned about Elon though. I think he’s a visionary, I think he’s valuable, but I also think he’s spread far too thin and he’s losing it as a result. Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, xAI, Neuralink, and his political efficiency project. All of these are full-time 100hr/week jobs. Even if you assume he literally never sees his gaggle of children, hell even if you assume he never sleeps, there’s literally not enough hours in the day. And I think he is thus blind to the fact that his antics are costing him support for the bigger mission.

    • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      Value investing isn’t dead. There are tons of value investors, and they aren’t the ones buying Tesla.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 months ago

        My point is, if this is how markets react to worsening sales and an actually insane CEO how can you trust a rational bet to pay off?

        • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 month ago

          Value investors don’t invest in Tesla, so you should not expect its share price to reflect fundamentals.

          But they do invest in stocks like Coca Cola and American Express, so you should expect the share prices of those companies to better reflect fundamentals.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 month ago

            That’s just another way of saying buyer sentiment is the only thing that matters, in which case we’re back to square one.

            • @AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Pretty much the definition of bubble stocks. If you don’t want emotion driven stocks, don’t ride the hype train. There are many many more stock opportunities, most of whose value is related to actual facts

            • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If you’re a value investor then you believe that the actual value of a company depends on its current and future earnings and the market price will tend towards the actual value in the long run.

              But naturally there are other factors that also influence the market price. In fact, the whole point of value investing is to find stocks that are “underpriced”. For various reasons, they are currently priced at a discount to their actual value. Those are the stocks you should buy, and you should expect their price to increase.

              Conversely, for various reasons some stocks are “overpriced”, like Tesla. You should not buy those, because you expect their price to decrease in the long run.

              A corollary is that value investors expect seemingly irrational price movements like we see with Tesla. If share prices perfectly reflected fundamentals, then it would be impossible to find a “good deal”.

              • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                Right. So anyway, the market does often appear oversensitive to buzz and under-responsive to fundamentals. What’s your take on market reforms? Are there any changes you’d like to see, regulatory or otherwise?

                • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t care if the market is under responsive to fundamentals. That just means some investors are exercising poor judgment by paying too much attention to irrelevant factors. It also gives an opportunity to investors with better judgment.

        • @iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          How does the first exclude the second? That’s like saying: how can I trust train travel if F1 cars drive 300km/h. They’re different things.

    • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      I wondered that a while ago when Tesla was worth more than many other car makers combined while producing far less vehicles than any single one of them. And I remember people telling me about projections and expectations and that it’s only a matter of time until everyone drives a Tesla basically. Sounded like mass hysteria to me back then because the rest of the world won’t just sit there quietly and let Tesla have a monopoly. People bought shares because they rose rapidly in value, causing even more people to buy shares. It’s a pyramid scheme like so many things these days and people have no problem with it apparently. They love gambling and playing lottery. Value investing is too boring for them.

    • @cevn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1412 months ago

      The investors are banking on Elon looting the Govt coffers into Tesla. I can’t deny the chances based on the other crap we are seeing.

      • @danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        291 month ago

        Exclusive contracts at 20% mark up. Can’t wait for all police vehicles to switch over to teslas.

        • @schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 month ago

          I’d support that: the new excuses as to why a suspect escaped would be fantastic.

          “Well, I would have caught him but my car died for some reason and I couldn’t get out.”

          “Well, I would have caught him but I hit a bump and half my car fell off.”

          “Well, I would have caught him, but my car caught fire and killed my partner.”

          “Well, I would haved caught him but it was raining so my bumper fell off and punctured my tire.”

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        292 months ago

        True enough. A bet on any tech stocks right now is probably safe on that basis - but I expect they really do plan to crash the stock market at some point… It would make sense if you wanted to consolidate ownership cheaply.

      • @Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        That but also removing green subsidies helps Tesla as it’s further ahead than other electric car rivals. Also, less safety regulations likely brings it closer to fully autonomous driving.

      • @Viri4thus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        They’re also banking on Elon staying alive for the next 4y which is a risky bet given how he immediately antagonised the MAGA crowd on H1Bs.

        • @samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 month ago

          The MAGA crowd hates just about everybody. The last time they did anything of note was the 1/6 insurrection, and that was with the help of Dear Leader.

    • @iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Value investing is basically dead, isn’t it?

      You’re looking at a too short time frame. The famous tulip bubble lasted for a decade, too.

  • @realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 month ago

    The CEO is too busy playing social media edgelord. I guess when you blow up a company to the point where it will pop, you have to go into politics to change the laws to make it more profitable.

  • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 month ago

    https://fortune.com/2025/01/29/tesla-shares-rally-2025-earnings-growth/

    Tesla shares rally on pledge to return to growth in 2025

    Continuing the bullshit from 2022, where Musk promised a typical year would have growth of 50!!

    Tesla plans to launch its autonomous ride-hailing service in Austin in June

    Hows that going Elron?

    “This is not some far off mythical situation,” Musk said on the company’s call with analysts. “It’s literally five months away.”

    So it’s been LITERALLY running for more than a half year now? Or is it still a no show, like the 7 previous years FSD should have been here?

    We can do this TODAY.

    He has said that so many times, on so many things, and it’s always a lie. FSD, Convoys of trucks that are cheaper than trains! Tesla being able to park. which it still can’t do reliably. And this is the very beginning of the claim that a Tesla can drive across the country (USA) to pick you up!

    Did ANYONE believe his bullshit ever, do people believe he will build a manned base on Mars eventually? A base that should have been up and running I think it was 2022!!!

    How is this man not in jail?

    Oh right, probably much the same way Trump is not in jail. USA is an oligarchy moving towards a fascist dictatorship!!

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      tessla plans to launch it’s autonomous ride hailing service

      Autonomous driving, like he’s promised he already had every year for over a decade now.

      Who does anyone believe this scammer? He is a con man, always had been, and I’m just amazed at the enormous amount of idiots believing his shit

    • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I believed him at first, why wouldn’t I? Self driving was starting to take shape, the demos looked good, I assumed what he was saying was legitimate.

      I remember starting to question things around the time of the Tesla Semi reveal. It didn’t make sense to me that you’d use heavy, short range batteries in an industry that runs by driving as far as possible, for as cheap as possible, hauling as much as possible. There were just too many compromises and he didn’t give any details other than acceleration (who cares in trucking).

      After that I started looking into him more and realized his bullshit spread through everything he touched. I honestly think most people are simply not paying attention to him, they just read headlines and since headlines never call him out and only amp up the crazy ambitious things he says, people believe he’s a genius.

      That seems to be slowly changing as he opens his stupid mouth about politics, but he’s pivoting to a new audience now.

      • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        I believed him at first, why wouldn’t I?

        Admittedly so did I. 😋
        I agree the Truck convoy claim to be cheaper than trains were so obviously bullshit, I was beginning to get on to him by that time, but if I wasn’t sure before that, I definitely agree at that time it became obvious that he is a fraud.

        headlines never call him out and only amp up the crazy ambitious things he says, people believe he’s a genius.

        Absolutely, it’s so bad much of the media are essentially complicit.

        That seems to be slowly changing
        Here it’s changing fast, it may be tomato - tomato, but some claim Tesla is still the best option, despite all the bullshit.
        But we recently had a report on how Tesla had record high failure rate on mandatory safety checks after 4 years here in Denmark. So maybe that will detract from the “best option” bullshit.
        Tesla claims to have cheaper servicing, but if the cars aren’t legally road worthy, when adhering to manufacturer service recommendations, that’s just another bullshit claim.

        I’ve seen reviews where they point out cheaper maintenance of Tesla as a HUGE advantage, making them cheapest car to own in their category. This has annoyed me a little, because I’m a little bit in love with the Skoda Enyaq, but it cost about twice in maintenance than a Tesla Y. Well maybe there’s a reason for that, and it doesn’t annoy me anymore. Because if you follow recommendations for the Skoda it’s actually maintained, the Tesla is not. The same for all other VW family cars, they are a bit expensive to maintain, but I’ve NEVER heard about problems like with Tesla on safety on any VW-group car.

  • @INeedMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    Net Profits: Dropped by 71% to $2.3 billion in Q4 2024.

    Since when 2.4 billion net profit is terrible?

    “Yes, we earned billions but it’s actually less than the year before!” Dude, go out and touch some grass…

    • @TechAnon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      71% drop in a single quarter is time for workers to start looking for other jobs bad. This was way before Elon’s Nazi salute so expect things to get way worse. I’d be so embarrassed if I drove a Tesla.

    • bobalot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      It’s terrible for the stock price which has a price to earnings ratio of almost 200.

      If this were a normal company with a profit margin of ~6% and a normal stock price (in line with the market average), it would be fine.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      622 months ago

      “Terrible” is just for attention, but the bit of news that would have cratered any other company’s stock it that it’s down 71% YOY. Plus:

      Regulatory Credits: $2.8 billion of profit came from selling regulatory credits, not from core business activities.

      People in the current administration have said they plan to end these credits in the coming months. Without them in 2024 Tesla would have reported a $500million loss for the year.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        Source on the killing of credits?

        Those are California ZEV credits, and other similar non USA programs.

        They’re going to kill a lot of other things, but haven’t heard about that yet.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Just on mobile now so can’t read it all, but it did get the gist across, thanks! I hadnt seen that yet.

            I still think they’d have to win a lawsuit against California saying California can’t have the program?

            Edit: as in I don’t think they can just scrap it like he’s scrapping other things via executive order.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And every other car manufacturer has valuation multiples 12x lower than Tesla’s. Musk’s worst nightmare is investors treating Tesla like a car company. That’s why he keeps pushing on “Tesla is an AI company that makes cars, not a car company.”

      • @splinter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        You misread the sheet slightly. The total profit for the year was $7.1 billion, of which $2.8 billion was renewable energy credits. I.e. their profit would have only been $4.3 billion.

    • @Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      When those profits come from carbon credits which means your main activity is still wildly unsustainable over a decade after the company being founded. Tesla is a massive investor bubble and their cars are objectively trash with failure rates 3x higher than the industry’s worse. Tesla is garbage sustained by a massive collective illusion of US exceptionalism.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        which means your main activity is still wildly unsustainable over a decade after the company being founded.

        Oh so it is an AI company then.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        When you know you’re going to get a billion dollars in credits for something, you plan your business around having those billion credits.

        You sell cars cheaper, you expand faster, you try new ideas you might not have tried etc.

        Tesla hasn’t needed those credits for a very long time now, but if they are there, of course they’re going to take as full advantage of the situation as they can.

        If the credits had stopped around when Tesla didn’t need them anymore, I’m sure they would look very different than today, but they’d still be around and profitable.

        • @Viri4thus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          Tesla would never exist in a capitalist system. Their business model is wholly predicated on government subsidies and carbon credits. Furthermore, the hen has come home to roost and their cars, like I linked above, are just bougie expensive paper weights sold by the biggest con man in history. If I was buying electric tomorrow, I’d even look at Volkswagen before considering a Tesla. I want my cars to last more than 4y, not try to kill me, and, I don’t like to pay extra for vapoware. If anything, the fact Tesla still exists, is testament we no longer live in a capitalist system but in an oligarchy where companies selling snake oil can still have high valuation because they are close to the N*%i Party party in power. Looking at Teslas’s results and seeing the carbon credit weight on their fundamentals and looking at the speed BYD is expanding, only Authoritarianism can save them from bankruptcy already in 2025. Luckily, their CEO just helped bring about the 4th reich, so they are fine, just don’t pretend it’s because it’s a solid enterprise, it’s anything but.

          • @futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Tesla would never exist in a capitalist system.

            This is a capitalist system. You might be referring to a free-market system, but those are rare and short-lived. Almost every capitalist system has subsidies, back-handers, state-protected monopolies and oligopolies, corruption, dirigiste policies, regulatory capture, and so forth. You can claim that none of it is capitalism, but it occurs in the only capitalist systems that exist in real life, so I suggest that you’re confusing “should” and “is.”

    • Ulrich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You just glossed right over the “dropped by 71%” bit…since when is that not terrible? That’s an incredible decrease in profits over the course of just 12 months.

    • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Since when 2.4 billion net profit is terrible?

      Since Musk claimed in 2022 that a 50% growth per year would be normal for Tesla. And people are stupid enough to partially believe him. In January 2024 Musk promised 2024 would be a HUGE growth year, with autonomous RoboTaxi being launched in June. He claimed it’s LITERALLY only 5 months away!!!

      https://fortune.com/2025/01/29/tesla-shares-rally-2025-earnings-growth/

      Tesla Inc. revealed plans to begin robotaxi operations and forecast a sales recovery this year, fueling what Elon Musk predicted would be an “epic” period of growth for the electric vehicle maker.

      Nothing he claimed or promised has come true. Quite the opposite.

    • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s bad because downward trends are bad, especially when the economy is growing.

      Look at it this way: suppose you have a job with a decent salary. Your supervisor calls you in and says, “Well, looks like we’re going to cut your pay next year”. You ask, “Is the company in trouble? Is everyone getting a pay cut?” And they answer, “No, the company is growing. Most people are getting raises. Not you, though.”

      That’s a bad sign.

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        It’s bad because the company is bad and they should collapse, not continue on.

  • @ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 month ago

    I’m glad for them.

    they don’t make electric vehicles. they make human sized battery powered over engineered poorly designed toys that were somehow street legal.

    • @boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      I can barely see how they were so popular up to now anyway. I, too, thought they were cool like 10 years ago, when they were the only real electric car (Leaf and I-Miev don’t count and we didn’t get the Bolt or Volt here, only Opel Ampera and Ampera-E, which are ultra rare). Then a couple of years later, I realized some things, in this order: 1) Tesla interiors are THE BLANDEST THING EVER, 2) Elon Musk’s been seeming increasingly weird starting with the cave diving incident, 3) Tesla quality control is absolute shite

      Tesla changed the world by proving you CAN have good range and performance in an EV, but now they’re way past their prime. The Germans, Swedes, Koreans and now I believe EVEN THE CHINESE make better EVs. I have no experience with non-Tesla American EVs to comment on those, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they surpass Tesla in overall quality of vehicle in a few years too.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        As an owner of a recent one, but before Musk’s issues got so hard to ignore, it has good quality, as did everyone I look at. Tesla had some very well publicized quality issues, when they were hand-building the first vehicles, scaling up the model 3, and trying to build the very different technology of the cybertruck, but their normal, recent cars seem fine

        As a gadget freak, teslas have many features that just don’t exist on other vehicles. Has any other manufacturer even gotten over-the-air updates right?

        Several of the other vehicles you mentioned aren’t available in the US. We can expect increased protectionism so they never will be.

        At least at the time, my Tesla was the lowest price EV with capabilities I wanted. The incentives made a huge difference but I don’t think it would qualify anymore plus they appear to be getting cancelled

        We did have a wave of vehicles expected over the next couple years that may give some competition, if those legacy manufacturers don’t retreat to selling ICE trucks and SUVs only. However GM botching the Trailblazer, and Volkswagen screwing up the software on their attempts do not bode well. Hyundai/Kia has some good possibilities. The high end has several good possibilities but for too high a price and too low a volume

      • Victor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Swedes? You mean Volvo? Aren’t those manufactured in China as well or nah?

        • @boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well yeah, they’re about as Swedish now as Chrysler is American. Maybe a tiny bit more.

          Still, they produce a lot of cars in Sweden, are traded on the Swedish stock market and are headquarered in Göteborg.

          Honestly, I think they’re doing better now than they were under Ford, but obviously they’ll never match the quality of Volvo’s old RWD bricks.

      • @rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Service being up 30% is a bad thing for the consumer. For a vehicle that doesn’t require much at all in the way of service…

        • @boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I’m not sure what Services means there though. It could very well include subscriptions rather than the actual servicing of their cars? Or maybe both?

          • @rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            re though. It could very well include subscriptions rather than the actual servicing of their cars? Or maybe both?

            true. the report is very very vague

  • @einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    So they are making bank on storage and energy, but they are allowing Trump and the EPA to ruin it? Also he makes electric vehicles and Trump and Co are trying to bring back gas guzzlers and straight pipes. Hmmm. I think Elons mouth wasn’t sufficiently moist enough for trump.

  • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 month ago

    Ah, but you’ve forgotten the real money maker.

    • Having full control over the regulatory authority that currently prevents him putting his automated deathtrap taxis on the roads

    Turns out it’s much cheaper to buy governments than it is to perfect self driving technology.

    • @ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      He probably needs all the H1B visas for his remote taxi drivers. I doubt the latency would be good enough otherwise. And it was clear in the ‘demo’ the pilot was just standing right there controlling it.

      • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        I doubt latency would be an issue.

        More the fact that they’ll be juggling too many at once.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Yeah but then it’s not teslas fault. That employee didn’t do their job and can be fired

  • NoSpiritAnimal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    Ah so only the unverifiable services that don’t require an easily trackable commodity did well.

    I wish I could make up income too.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    You can’t base their company value on the stock market … you base it on how much power and influence they have over government.

    And judging by the amount of stupidly arranged love affair they are having with the government … they should be very highly valued.

    • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, you base company value on its current and future earnings.

      All that government influence is useless if people stop buying your products. And it turns out lots of people don’t want to buy products associated with Musk.

      • @Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Not in this world.

        People will be pushed to buy the products. Patriotism, xenophobia, lies, economic fear and tariffs, straight up government manipulation and collusion.

        That’s the value Elon has, Zuck is jealous of, Tesla and the shareholders will benefit from, and the people allow.

        • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I’m sure that Musk hopes that “people will be pushed to buy” his products.

          But so far, that plan isn’t working. In fact it’s backfiring, people are running away from his products.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    Credits aside, these dont seem like bad numbers when compared to spend/investment. Tesla management got what they wanted.