Google is gradually introducing a new method for delivering targeted ads in Chrome that aims to bypass the controversy surrounding cookies by using browsing history instead. This…

  • @Scotthomas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -82 years ago

    Ok. Imma get lambasted for this, but here goes.

    I have no problem seeing ads. I respect that if I’m getting a commercial product or service for ‘free’, then I’m paying another way.

    If I have to see ads, why not see ads that might be relevant to my interests? I mean, I’d rather see an ad for a video game than a bank.

    I don’t see what all the FUD is about. What the fuck are y’all surfing that you’re so protective of?

    • tb_
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Targeted advertisements can be harmful, by directing (for example) gambling ads at people who show to be prone to addiction through the websites they visit.

      Ads are fine, in some way, but I do not want random companies I’ve never heard of to know all of my details. Details which may become hacked.

      Just because “I’ve got nothing to hide” doesn’t mean I should be happy when everyone knows all about me.

      • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        For this feature though they’ve tried to select the topics to be ones that “[do] not include sensitive categories (i.e. race, sexual orientation, religion, etc.)”. The list is also public and gambling is not on it:

        https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/topics/blob/main/taxonomy_v2.md

        While this won’t satisfy those who want no individualized ads or no ads at all, it would be an improvement over what we have now and put control over what topics are used (or even if it’s enabled at all) in the local browser instead of some server online.

    • Hello Hotel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The machanical extraction of highly personal data (did you have sex last night?) to build faux diary entries on people (this person lives alone) so others can easly pair their tailored attacks on the psyche to those who are vunrable. Were all vulnerable, just in diffrent places. Just gotta figure yours out.

      I wish these systems were built to help match people with helpful products, but the non concent bugs me intensely.

    • @Boldizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’d be concerned about the fact that you could live in a country where a law change could occur where suddenly the govt tells Google to keyword search people’s internet history on certain topics so they can start investigating and potentially prosecuting people.

      You might not have anything to hide now but what you do that’s legal now might become illegal later, the US is a perfect example of that with all kinds of backwards BS happening there, abortion being a big example.

      • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Isn’t this client-side solution for analyzing the history and coming up with ad topics for sites better in your scenario than the server-side solutions currently in use though? A government would have a much harder time trying to get access to the data when it’s on each individual’s device, rather than a profile created through an online ad service.

  • Pat
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Vivaldi is going to block this. It is a thing being built into the engine and they are going to be blocking it in their browser.

    I know people say Vivaldi is slow but they’ve done some refactoring recently. Gave it a whirl and it’s as fast as Edge now on my old crappy laptop.

  • Peacemeal12
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Honestly, yes you guys should move to Firefox. I pretty much stayed on Chrome until chromium Edge was a thing. I tried that and ended up using that until they bloated it to hell and back, so I am back to using Firefox. Honestly just use anything but Chrome.

  • @s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    982 years ago

    Here’s how to turn that off:

    1. Uninstall Google Chrome
    2. Install Firefox, Ungoogled Chromium, or, heck, Vivaldi
    3. Stop trusting Google

    There we go, problem solved.

    • @lustrum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Remember when websites were tracking us across websites like the Facebook pixel.

      Now Google just like we ain’t need that.

  • @Koffiato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    Best solution: Stop using Chrome.

    It’s not the fastest nor the most feature rich anymore, not even the simplest.

  • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Weren’t they already doing that?

    Chrome didn’t have the option to delete your browsing history every time you shut your browser, presumably for that exact reason.

  • @LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    70
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    here’s how to turn that off

    … use Firefox? How are we still talking about chrome here?

    Edit: yes I know many still use Chrome. That’s exactly the problem. Google does shady shit, people shrug it off because insert whatever reason. Google likes that and plans the next shady shit. Rinse, repeat.

  • FireWire400
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Does this only affect Chrome or other Chromium-based browsers (i.e. Edge) as well?

  • Dem-Bo Sain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    It sounds like Google could have done a much better job announcing and explaining how the new system works. This is a definite improvement in privacy over the “cookie” standard in advertising. I don’t know if turning this off just keeps you locked-in to using cookies, but it doesn’t turn off identification like a lot of you seem to imply.

    To those of you out there not using an adblocker: this new system eliminates the use of advertiser-based cookies. All your identification is based on a minimal number of categories based on your browsing history. It doesn’t send your actual history to an advertiser, just some (5, I think?) topics that have held your interest within the last few weeks. I’m sure there’s a list of these keywords sent to the ad-server so it can decide what to send. I don’t really care what they are, because I’m in the next group.

    To those of you out there using Firefox and/or an adblocker: carry on, nothing to see here. Keep promoting your favorite non-Chrome based browser and adblocker.

  • @pearsche@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -32 years ago

    I don’t mind this at all, but it’s funny that I barely if ever get ads that would make me want to buy something. I don’t even use an adblocker on my android phone and i use chrome on me laptop