• @Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Alphabet has used data from all these sources all the time.

    That’s actually the reason I don’t use gmail except for registering Android, or use google calender, or google search except occasionally. I have my youtube account separate from my Android, and I don’t allow any cloud services, like photo or any other storage or sync services.

    The power Google can gain from using these things in combination is huge, just like Facebook influenced the 2016 US presidential election, Google/Alphabet could use this for both political and financial gains to an enormous degree, that would have been completely unheard of prior to Internet becoming widely used.

    • @huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -132 years ago

      They explicitly stated that they do not.

      They have a lot of rules around data control and privacy that are followed internally because the engineers care to toe the line of public statements.

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For the last three decades, tech companies have been operating in a “Ask for forgiveness, not permission” mentality.

        Microsoft didn’t get such a large monopoly by playing fair. Neither did Google, Amazon, Uber, etc.

        They have always said one thing, the courts found it to be inaccurate, and then they go “Oops” and pay $500 million “cost of doing business” while making 1000+ billion.

        • @Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Wait wait wait
          You’re telling me multinational mega-corporations lie? That can’t be right.

      • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        Except you can have one account to cover all those Google services. Meaning it must be trivial for Alphabet/Google to do the same.

        Just because your average engineer isn’t allowed to, doesn’t mean they can’t do it at “special requests”, like law enforcement or “research”.

        To put it another way, it’s to much potential power to entrust with a single company.

  • Engywook
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    I mean, at this point I find very difficult to believe that people willingly putting their entire life in free Google accounts don’t know that they’re basically ads meat anyway. The outrage makes no sense.

    • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This is absolutely true. Some of us were fine with the trade off in the beginning, because of how useful the services were when linked together. Google didn’t start off with everything linked like it is now. This unification of all their services with no walls or filters has been an ongoing development for more than a decade. I remember having to be on a waiting list to even get a GMail account after getting an invite from someone I knew. I’ve been around using google services since then. Back when Gmail and the calender weren’t separate apps. When YouTube wasn’t linked to Gmail or a Google account the way it is now. The landscape has changed drastically.

  • @kureta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    openai’s chat gpt, and microsoft’s bing flavor of chat gpt both have android apps. google’s bard does not. that is all…

  • @regbin_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    This is super cool. No longer need to fiddle with third-party LLM APIs.

    For those worried that your emails contents might get leaked, I’m pretty sure they’re not using your email content to train, but only use it as context. LLMs are stateless, as soon you you start a new chat, it forgets everything from before.

    • @Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      If you believe Google isn’t planning on eventually training Bard on Gmail, then I have a half dozen bridges to sell you.

      • @regbin_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        That’s a different thing and they will have to ask for consent separately. I’m specifically talking about the feature of allowing Bard to access your emails/schedules/etc.

  • @cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Switched to outlook but soon found out that some of your emails arent even received. That occured when I was trying to sign up to this lemmy instance. Luckily the admin was a very friendly person who understood the situation and manually approved my signup.

      • Pastor Haggis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I’m starting to switch over to Proton. I haven’t paid for it yet but my plan is to start paying and potentially grab usernames on other sites so I can have a consistent email across any site I decide to use.

        • /home/pineapplelover
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Proton unlimited was one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. Very nice vpn service that works even on arch Linux on school wifi (making sure to switch to tcp protocol), e2ee mail that I use to send confidential medical records to drs, included simplelogin premium (currently over 400+ aliases), excellent and knowledgeable customer support, and so much more. I just really love this company and their role in the FOSS, privacy, security space.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only reason I ever use my gmail is because they are tied to my phone and some of the games on my phone, otherwise I wouldn’t be using them.

    • /home/pineapplelover
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I deleted google and only have game accounts email only from simplelogin aliases. Maybe you’ll eventually realize google is a shit company and leave that environment as well.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        As much as I don’t like gøøgl€, on the phone front, it’s the lesser of the two evils I can choose from currently. I probably won’t be able to outright buy my next phone before getting service and slap on a custom ROM, so I’d rather deal with the devil I know over appl€.

          • Dizzy Devil Ducky
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            There definitely are options, but I’m just not sure I’ll be able to outright purchase a phone and flash a ROM like grapheneos on it. I feel as though at this point I’ll probably have to end up just upgrading through my carrier and I don’t know if they even allow you to root or flash phones from them without terminating service.

            • /home/pineapplelover
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If you get it from carrier and it’s locked, even google pixels, then you cannot flash custom rom on there.

  • @hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good luck using all my spam I get on my gmail inbox to serve me ads that get blocked instantly.

    Edit: openboard autocorrect.

  • Neptune
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    What makes anyone think google didn’t have the access before anyway?

    • @Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      They did. Its not about that

      Now you can throw in a boring pdf, into your drive, and have bard read it and summarize each chapter. For example.

      I asked it to read a report i have written for school and summarize it and give mr a few pointers where i could improve it. It was nice and speedy.

      Granted the report isnt super long.

      Wonder how well it does on a 700 page pdf…

    • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      They certaintly did, and already used AI to comb through it for their monitized stalking campaign. I think the only difference now is you can now make use of this somehow too, but I only read the headline lol.

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you choose to use the Workspace extensions, your content from Gmail, Docs, and Drive is not seen by human reviewers, used by Bard to show you ads, or used to train the Bard model.

    Yeah… really comforting, Google. Really comforting.

        • @huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Google is literally evil and everyone who works there wants to kick puppies seems to be the prevailing sentiment here.

          Which isn’t true but people really like to pretend the world is black and white instead of infinitely nuanced shades of gray.

    • ciferecaNinjo
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Just curious- what exactly do you mean by that? Do you mean abandoning/trashing your google account, or do you mean also refusing to send email to gmail recipients?

      Personally I’ve gone all the way. Ditching the Google acct was just the 1st step (which implies also ditching Google Playstore). Then I quit sending email to gmail & outlook recipients. Then I went further and do an MX lookup on all email addresses to verify whether a vanity address like bob@lastname.com resolves to google. This has made #email mostly dead to me.

      • @Z4rK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        I won’t stop sending to Google recipients. I have moved my email to Proton, but because of lacking search functionality there I have not yet migrated historic emails.

        I’ve stopped using other Google services and deleted data except for Maps and YouTube. Maps I can probably get rid of. YouTube I’ll keep but may be able to use a more fake account.

        • Wild Bill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I was stuck with a Google account because I still wanted to view Youtube, but then I found alternatives like Piped and Freetube that let you import your subscriptions. Maybe that’s an option, if you’re interested.

      • @blabber6285@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        I’m wondering what was the email usage like in the first place if you can just choose to stop sending to most people.

        But to be honest, I’ve only sent handful of emails from my personal account within the same number of years.

    • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I wonder what will happen when proprietary Open AI LLM’s start scraping data that the companies use them don’t want scraped because it’s proprietary. IT department using LLM for code for the company wide web portal. And now schematics for a new device are scraped etc.

  • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    I know people who have their passwords on a google doc or email passwords. I foresee a lot of accounts getting hacked once people can crack the right prompts for the LLM.

    • @regbin_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      That won’t work because they’re not going to train Bard on your email contents or documents.

        • @regbin_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Most probably yes, it will add those information to the context. Once you delete the chat, those data are gone.

          • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            That’s much better than using it for general training. Does anything keep Google from using it for training in the future though?

            • @regbin_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Their terms and privacy policy I guess. Also the possibility of data leak. I don’t think even Google would train their LLM on knowingly private data, that would be utter insanity.

        • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Probably something similar to what they were doing back in 2010 with Google Now. Skimming data from emails and texts etc in order to give you more pertinent information with Google Assistant’s predecessor. The google now page of that time could tell me when my flight left, what gate it boarded at, if it was delayed, what airport entrance to use. It told me when my bills were due and how much. It tracked orders for me and told me when they were out for delivery or delivered. It would help me to pick a restaurant for a special occasion, direct me where to call or book for a reservation. I found it very useful and then privacy concerns basically tanked it.

          We got a rebrand that did some of the same things with Google Assistant. And for a while that was really useful for a lot of the same things. But now that they’ve realised that data collection for this doesn’t net them ever increasing profits there’s a push for new better things. The new better apps and services don’t really do what people want or need. They are specifically and ever increasingly meant to funnel more data to Google and more ads to consumers. There were a lot of potentially really good useful services that this style of scraping provided. But on the other hand, they didn’t ask. They just took that info. And then saved face by sunsetting the product that people were gripping about.

          If you use google services at all, google has a profile on you. Even limiting the spec of that profile by opting out of assistant and turning off a lot of their tracking doesn’t necessarily help you maintain privacy. And google services includes their app store and phones.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      They’ll probably isolate the models from each other, but yeah, if they want to train shared models from private data then that could happen.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Bard is the name of the service, they can create account specific models trained on your user data which aren’t shared with other accounts (as an extension of the base model built on public data). I’ve already read about companies doing this to avoid cross contamination. Pretty sure Google is aware of this.

          • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            But I don’t know if Google cares enough about privacy to bother training individual models to avoid cross contamination. Each model takes years worth of super computer time, so the fewer they’d need to train, the less costly.

            • Natanael
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Extending existing models (retraining) doesn’t need years, it can be done in far less time.

              • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Hmm, I thought one of the problems with LLMs was they’re pretty baked in in the training process. Maybe that was only with respect to removing information?

                • Natanael
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Yeah, it’s hard to remove data already trained into a model. But you can retrain them to add capabilities to an existing model, so if you copy one based on public data multiple times and then retrain with different sets of private data then you can save a lot of work