Microsoft owes $29 billion in back taxes plus penalties and interest to IRS::The IRS sent a surprise bill to Microsoft, hitting the company with a $28.9 billion bill for back taxes and penalties spanning a decade, starting in 2003.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    But they’re a giant corporation so that’s apparently fine.

  • @jmd_akbar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    931 year ago

    Next week, Microsoft negotiates the pending tax figure to $0…

    Week after that, Microsoft is raising Office plans by $5 per user per month across the board to cover their tax bills…

    • @spudwart@spudwart.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -141 year ago

      Paying to use Microsoft office when OnlyOffice exists, lmao.

      And if it’s a company paying for the user’s Microsoft office bs, then imo the point is mute.

      Honestly, Microsoft can get bent. They aren’t going to negotiate to 0, these actions are being done after being long overdue, and it’s clear this administration is raising hell.

      And the extra incentive here of $29B in tax dollars isn’t going to hurt either.

      • @PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure why you’re getting downvoted. OO is great for MSOffice files. I love LibreOffice, and it’s great for many things. It just can’t beat OO at MSOffice interoperability

      • @dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        OnlyOffice? The fuck is that?

        Looks

        Repackaged open source payware trash.

        LibreOffice works just fine without having yet another third party dev pilfering it to make it their bankroll. They’ve seemingly built an entire ecosystem with resellers and all trying to FUD themselves into a claim of being more compatible with MS doc formats than LibreOffice.

        Support LibreOffice development instead.

        https://www.libreoffice.org/

        Or…

        Just pay for MS Office if you have document compatibility concerns.

        • @PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          OnlyOffice is amazing if you need compatibility with MS Office products. Not saying it’s perfect, and I have and use LibreOffice, but OnlyOffice is better fit than LibreOffice if your goal is to use MSOffice files in FOSS software. I don’t get to decide what files and software my school or work uses, and they use only MSOffice. If I hand my boss or coworker an ODS, they’ll have no clue what to do with it. LibreOffice doesn’t handle XLSX files nearly as cleanly as OnlyOffice.

          If I make a table in LibreOffice, even using their open formats, I am giving up some nice features from OpenOffice.

          There’s no way OO is just a cheap repackage of LO. They look very different and have different features.

      • VBB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        OO even breaks .ods spreadsheets created in LO.

  • JJROKCZ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Yea but the us military depends on them continuing to support xp just for them soooooo, why should they pay? They could literally cripple the world

      • @clanginator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Problem is, there’s a lot of really specialized, critical software, that is provided by vendors and throws an absolute fit with any change. You could maybe run Windows in a VM, but it may not work with the specialized hardware and networking gear being used, and now you’re spending a bunch of extra time and money setting up a vm if windows inside Linux, which means you also have to train everyone on how to use the VM, adds another management/security issue, and adds another point of failure.

        If they ever switch (the entire govt should, it would be so awesome to see the govt resources put into Linux development instead of M$ pockets) it’d have to be a very gradual process, and windows would still be around decades from now for legacy systems. (If the US hasn’t imploded in civil war or the planet melted by then 🫠)

        • mosiacmango
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, the military literally has the guns. Microsoft will support them or it will be nationalized and then support them.

          Not exactly a position Microsoft has much actual leverage in.

            • mosiacmango
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think its more likely that the dept in Microsoft and all auxiliary depts that maintain the military’s systems would be forcibly drafted and any resources they need seized enmass and with no regard for what is destroyed in the process.

              Fort lewis is near Microsoft headquaters, and they have lots of big flying things, boom boom shooty things, and even more boots on ground.

              I doubt it would help Linux much, but it would be an interesting day in Redmond for sure.

  • @tsuica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    IRS commin’ in tellin’ me “Ain’t you boys goin’ gimme some back taxes?”

    I told them they’d be lucky if they got some front taxes.

  • @ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    Clippy pops up on Excel. “Hey, it looks like you are trying to funnel revenue through a shell organisation in the Caribbean.”

  • plz1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I hope they pay up and we just send that to Ukraine as aid.

  • @nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1091 year ago

    The IRS agent who worked up this case is either going to be up for a few days of extra vacation time or perhaps a job at Microsoft.

  • @MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The issues that generated this debt pertains to intercompany transfer pricing.

    Can someone explain what this means in english?

    Edit: I looked into it more and it seems the IRS objects to how Microsoft attributed cost and revenue between its international entities. I’ve heard of this practice being used to arbitrarily shift tax burden internationally. For example, let’s say a US company builds Widgets that cost $20 to make and sells them for $50. By normal accounting, that would result in a net of $30 taxable in the US. But if the company spins up a subsidiary in Ireland to hold its Widget production patents, they can charge the US branch $30 per unit in patent royalties. This results in net $0 taxable in the US and $30 taxable in Ireland. One limitation is that the money has to stay in Ireland. But if the company is already a multi-national one, there’s a good chance they have legitimate business expenses in Europe that the money could be later spent on. The end result is that talent and work from American workers, and revenue largely coming from American buyers, is being manipulated to avoid paying taxes back into the American economy, just because the business has international interests and there are many tax havens overseas.

    • @neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      A company as big as Microsoft is not just one company. Just like movie studioes will famously make their film “lose money” to avoid royalty payments, I would bet Microsoft is trying to avoid taxes by selling services, products or profits “at a loss” between different corporate LLCs all owned by Microsoft.

      Imagine if your time spent grocery shopping was an “import” corporation that overcharged your “works for a salary” corporation, all within your household.

      But I’m sure someone can read the SEC filing and understand for sure.

  • BlanketsWithSmallpox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So where are all those fake democrats complaining that Biden’s funding the IRS is just going to have them go after small businesses and the lower/middle classes?

    How’s that go? Gaslight, obstruct, project? lol

    The IRS overwhelmingly go after poor people as they don’t have the means to defend themselves and end up settling out of desperation.

    I’m sure after they get more money they’ll totally change though lol

    Applejacks where you at buddy?

    • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      False dichotomy. They can go for a big, easy target as well as little peeps. Monitoring $600 transactions kind of shows they’re not just interested in big guys.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Right? It’s so silly that they think it’s an all or nothing process. Then again, it’s the internet lmfao.

        How about we uphold that the law and taxes are for ALL people, not just rich or poor. We have graduated/progressive tax brackets for a reason. Everyone should be paying their fair share.