• @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I mean this is already unsurprising given how easy it was to get a blue checkmark as a journalist back when it was Twitter.

    Literally any media corporation could get it for any of their employees. But for anyone else, you had to pay thousands to get a middleman who had a contact at twitter to verify you. It was such a weird system.

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Well, I mean, didn’t he change the standards for what it takes to get a blue checkmark? This is no surprise to me.

  • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    This definitely feels le sampling bias to me. What percentage of xhitter as a whole is paying for blue checks? What percentage of information regarding the war from blue checks is true? How does that compare with the same figure for non paying customers?

  • @jray4559@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    About everyone (including several news sites) have produced false/misleading claims about who launched which rocket and how many were killed and all the other stuff, because this fight is messy, and both sides want to look good.

    How many of those misinformers just copied from another source that’s supposed to be more trusted?

  • @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Everyone continuing to use Twitter/X is thereby materially supporting fascism. That’s what the service exists for today.

  • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1881 year ago

    It’s almost as if paying for a trusted or verified badge makes it easier to spread misinformation

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He claims that paying helps eliminate bots, there’s no way he truly believes that or he is dumber than given credit for. The entities that are interested in disinformation have deep pockets. Most of disinformation on Facebook was done by paying them.

      • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        But then unemployed facebook moms can’t spread their misinformation about whatever it is that’s virally spreading that week.

        • SonnyVabitch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Why though? How is his life any different if he makes more money?

          • @0xD21F@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            Because Twitter owes more in interest on the loans he took to buy it than it makes every month and he needs to dig himself out of a financial black hole.

          • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If twatter turns a profit he looks good (to simps). If it craters he looks like he fucked up.

            Two words for Lonnie: clown shoes

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            What has been his motivation since becoming a millionaire? Money gives him control over others.

    • danque
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      The moment it became paid to be official was the moment spammers and worse thought they would become recognised as trustworthy. Nowadays if it’s blue dont believe anything they say.

      So a large amount of dipshits who’re are stupid or vicious enough to pay for blue, digital checkmarks are largely posting false content that is believed by other dipshits who get their knowledge just by a degenerated social media platform like twitter?

      Call me surprised… /s