• Whisp
    link
    fedilink
    451 year ago

    Oh rip HTML gmail view. I’ve actually had to use that semi-recently with an email that didn’t play properly.

    • debounced
      link
      fedilink
      50
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it’s also a big FU to everyone accessing Gmail’s web interface over geostationary satellite internet connections. i had to deal with that shit for a few months and HTML mode was the only way to ease the pain from how bad the latency can get. the “normal” view would hang like a mofo all the time.

      • @Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Agreed. I’ve reverted to HTML mode recently when tethering from my phone. The signal is bad enough sometimes that it makes a world of difference. Gmail was virtually unusable until I realized HTML mode was still an option.

        Really just time to bite the bullet and acknowledge that it is worth the hassle to switch away from a company that I don’t like or trust.

      • GigglyBobble
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Wouldn’t a locally installed IMAP client produce less traffic than any web UI? I only use those.

    • @thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      They’d be better off using a client like tetramail that is designed for the visually impaired. Afaik Gmail still supports imap

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      The big tragedy there is the loss for the visually impaired. They can switch to a new email provider, but they will have to switch over any necessary emails such as subscription reminders and they will have to be able to download or transfer what might be a decade’s worth of archived emails. That will likely be beyond some of them in terms of technical capability and possibly accessibility.

      But then Google couldn’t give two shits about the disabled.