Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi…::ChatGPT went from answering a simple math correctly 98% of the time to just 2%, over the course of a few months.
You must log in or register to comment.
This is peer-reviewed? they use a line in the discussion which seems relatively unprofessional, telling people to join a 12-step program if they like to use artificial training data.
Not affiliated with the paper in any way. Have just been following the news around it.
I think arvix has no rule requiring a paper be per reviewed before uploading.
deleted by creator
ArXiv papers are never peer reviewed.
Thank you
