• @Zunon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 year ago

    yes it does, net neutrality not only has to do with the ISP but also the services. different useragent string should NOT lead to a worse quality of service.

    • El Barto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Got any source on that? I’m legitimately asking to learn more about that.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      It doesn’t, that’s FTC / anticompetitive law territory

    • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Right, but your service provider has nothing to do with that difference. The fact that the entity you’re contacting on the other end of the connection is providing a degraded experience isn’t an internet service delivery problem.

      Your internet service, which is what net neutrality is concerned with, is distinct from services on the internet. In the same way that your phone service has nothing to do with the quality of service you get from HP’s telephone support line.

      • @ag10n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The web is based on open standards; that’s what made it universally accessible. How does limiting access based on how you access the web benefit anyone?

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Imagine a business making some smoothies with water provided by the utility company. The business decides to sell less appetizing smoothies to certain organizations. Are you saying that that’s a “water utility neutrality” issue?

        • @vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          It doesn’t, but that isn’t their point. They’re simply pointing out that existing net neutrality laws in the US usually only apply to ISPs and telcos, not internet businesses.

        • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Where did I say it did? The fact that it’s not a net neutrality issue doesn’t mean it’s not an issue. Net neutrality is just a specific thing that isn’t this.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Nobody is defending the practice, they’re just differentiating it from what we’ve previously referred to as “net neutrality,” which is 100% entirely about how ISPs process internet traffic, and not about the services being used within that traffic.

          Unless I missed the memo, and “net neutrality” means something different now.

          • @ag10n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Since Google is both the service provider for the client browser and also provides last-mile internet services; they would fit the definition of a supposed neutral ISP but also neutral for applications and services further up the OSI stack.

            Net neutrality is not just a service provider concept but has been viewed this way in the cases service providers have tried to game the system. It also encompasses the concept of an open internet; the neutrality of data is data and presentation, or lack of to the client is defined by open standards, not the desires of any one party.