• @iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -311 year ago

    Can we get away from email?

    It’s not a secure form of communication anyway. I want my messages to be e2e encrypted so I know I am the only one that can read them

        • naticus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          You can encrypt it for non-Proton users very easily.

          • HACKthePRISONS
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            oh? i have friends that use protonmail and i’ve asked them to do it. no one has succeeded yet

            • naticus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Yep, it just has you set a password, confirm it, and even set a hint if you want. Works on web or mobile.

                • naticus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Yes, there’s no other implementation I know of for provider-to-provider encrypted email. O365 is very similar. Recipients can then reply back too and the Proton user receives it directly.

    • GigglyBobble
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What a stupid thing to say.

      Whatever your favorite (and probably shitty) proprietary or open source messaging service - not everybody uses it. But hey, everyone has email, so let’s kill that.

      BTW since you said encryption is important to you: your walled-garden messaging service has a much easier time profiling you and your friends than they would in a heterogenous environment like email. They don’t need the content anyway, just metadata.

      • @asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        IDK, I think that’s kind of flawed logic. E.g. “we should stop using gasoline for cars and switch to electric” - would you say “what a stupid thing to say. everyone uses gas so we shouldn’t try to stop”?

        And are you not aware of Signal? It’s open source, and the default server is not, but it doesn’t matter since it is E2E encrypted, just like Proton. The difference is that ProtonMail allows you to communicate unencrypted with non-ProtonMail accounts.

        I think all they’re saying is that, similar to gas users, there are many people who will not stop using it or just don’t care unless we sunset gas cars / email for them.

        I do agree with that, and in both cases it isn’t something which can happen overnight, but it is a serious long term problem which IMO we should be pushing to solve.

        • GigglyBobble
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          No, they can’t since I don’t have a Google mail address. Even if I had, they’d have a harder time building a social graph when I communicate with others outside of Gmail.

          • @iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Okay, but unless all of your communication is e2e encrypted, your provider can read all of your messages. They can even show you ads based on the contents. Oh, you bought vitamins on Amazon? How about some minerals?

            If I send messages with matrix, the matrix server admin cannot read them. If I cared about them seeing who I’m talking to, I would run my own server

    • BoofStroke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s what s/mime does. If it were as easy to get personal certs as it is to get server certs through letsencrypt, everyone could easily sign and encrypt mail.

      I can certainly do it anyway, but you’d have to trust my self signed cert.

      That said, it’s pretty rare to find relays these days that are not using tls for transport, so there’s that.