Device uses movement of ions to generate airflow without any moving parts like in iPads and MacBook Air.

        • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          They’re “bladeless” fans are just regular fans with more steps. Those added steps introduce inefficiencies. Simple as that. If you wanted to make a fan more efficient, you could add a shroud close to the blades, but the energy cost of electric fans are already low enough that it really doesn’t matter.

        • @splinter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Advertising for a product isn’t a citation. That article literally just repeats Dyson’s own claims. Do you have anything that actually tests that claim?

            • @splinter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              You made an assertion. If you are unable to provide supporting evidence, we can assume that your assertion is incorrect without needing to prove anything.

          • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            I don’t think you two are even contradicting each other. The airflow going through the base can be 15x smaller than the total result, but also require more energy than just using a regular fan that moves that amount of air.

            Total airflow and efficiency are two independent things.

            Disclaimer: I have no real data on how Dyson fans work.

              • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                As demonstraded by the ActionLab video someone else posted, “bladeless” fans in general are less efficient. The one he tested was not a Dyson and didn’t have a HEPA filter.

                  • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    23 months ago

                    It was also moving more volume of air, not just airspeed. Sure I would have loved to see a fully shrouded experiment, but their experiment did show a regular fan moved air faster over a wider area, which would mean it is also moving a higher volume of air.