I wonder what his first clue was.

  • @kibiz0r@midwest.socialEnglish
    29•2 months ago

    After seeing that the public was willing to call DeepSeek “open source” for releasing 800 lines of Python, an opaque model, and a PDF vaguely describing (or just praising) the proprietary training framework… Yeah, I imagine he feels like he missed an opportunity.

    • burghlerEnglish
      51•2 months ago

      It’s been a few days and a simple search reveals it’s already been reproduced by many different bodies using the “vague” pdf. What’s this disservice for?

      • @KingRandomGuy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2•1 month ago

        TBH the paper is a bit light on the details, at least compared to the standards of top ML conferences. A lot of DeepSeek’s innovations on the engineering front aren’t super well documented (at least well enough that I could confidently reproduce them) in their papers.