Barack Obama: “For elevator music, AI is going to work fine. Music like Bob Dylan or Stevie Wonder, that’s different”::Barack Obama has weighed in on AI’s impact on music creation in a new interview, saying, “For elevator music, AI is going to work fine”.

        • @itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Most stuff looks pretty generic, you’re right. But there’s actually been a couple times when I’ve been baffled by the output. For this one, for example, I just gave it my username

          • @Inmate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I think magicians love when audiences are willing to both believe in magic and maintain a respect for the secrecy of their trade.

            I’ll tell you what I know for sure: people from my generation are working like their lives depend on it to separate the new generations from their money using our triumphant new invention; so of course this looks like impressive art to younger people and no one else; you’ll love the AI music we sell you too! And wait till you meet all the AI characters we’ve trained for you! You can sit, jaw dropped stifling laughter to hear the next joke designed to make you cackle so hard you piss yourself, in a room full of tailored friends.

            There are still tons of real things in this world: they still inspire more fruitful wonder than we do for ourselves and our contraptions.

          • @interceder270@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            That takes a steaming hot dump on what the vast majority of people can do.

            It’s why people are scared. They should be.

            • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That takes a steaming hot dump on what the vast majority of people can do.

              I’d argue that it is a steaming hot dump of random, deviant art quality junk, but to each their own.

              • @interceder270@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                I’d argue people like you are going to hold it under much more scrutiny knowing it’s made by AI instead of humans.

                I’d also argue you will do this without admitting it.

            • @Inmate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              HAHA that’s crazy you think that that is so great.

              I was like this in the 90s with MDs.

              You probably think AI porn is “stunning” 🤣

              • @interceder270@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                ‘So great’ would be inaccurate.

                I said it “takes a steaming hot dump on what the vast majority of people can do.”

                Tell me you feel called out without telling me you feel called out. Lol.

                • @Inmate@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  Why would I feel called out by a pattern I’ve seen a few times before and the generation before me saw even more than that?

                  You’re like the dude in the other 20s, “you fools! Look to the sky! The dirigible has conquered the realm once enjoyed freely only by the birds and angels! I’ll take a streaming hot DUMP on you from here! One golden ticket onto the glorious Hindenburg!”

                  Flies are just consequences of shit; I don’t feel much of anything about flies I figure 🤷‍♂️

              • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s an infinite crap generator, which I can see why people are so enamored with it. Because people seem to want a seeming variety of generic junk almost instinctually. Just take a look at the variety of garbage available on all streaming platforms right now, the variety of garbage on YouTube, or even worse a single aisle in any grocery store: shelves full of crap that’s often the same thing with different labels, substances that are utter shit on almost a molecular level but seem appealing or better than others based upon packaging.

                Edit: Amazon is nearly a perfection of the instant, endless crap business model. Just imagine when someone hooks up one of these things to a 3d printer. You can then have infinite crap generated entirely based upon your search queries. Now if you’ll excuse me I have a patent application to file…

              • @Inmate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I think your generation’s the first to be totally pink for this sort of thing and I’m worried for ya

                I’m gutted that you can’t tell the difference. Or that you don’t care to. It’s sad you think this toy is an idol.

      • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        What is good art? Stuff like this can be produced with zero effort in a couple of seconds.

        Lol, not that.

  • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -241 year ago

    I suppose I’m happy that he is no longer president if he has strong opinions on topics he is clueless.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      I don’t think they’re strong opinions

      People often get asked to weigh in on things, and then news headlines run with the responses. Sure everyone could say “I don’t know enough so I won’t say anything”, but that’s a little unproductive.

      I find it annoying especially when some news agency asks a loaded question, and then regardless of the response they have some story to run with

  • @eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    While reassuring for many to hear, that’s only going to be true for so long. Eventually it’s going to be real fucking good at making “real” music. We need to be preparing for those advancements rather than acting like they’ll never come.

    • @31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      To make “real” music, AI will probably need a lot of help. Image generators and chat bots seem to have their own, very boring style. I’ve seen videos of artists using AI tools in their workflow, but it’s still a very involved process. I think it will just be another tool for musicians and sound engineers.

      • @eronth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m the immediate term, yeah I 100% agree. However, I’m not thinking we bank on that being true forever.

    • @IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel very reassured to hear that from the AI expert / musical virtuoso himself, 62 year old, former United States President Barack Obama.

  • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow, a word from a global expert on AI, Barrack Obama. I hope he’s a bit better at it than he is at world peace!

  • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1111 year ago

    …so I’ve been on a shit load of elevators, and I don’t recall a single one of them having music. For as common a trope as it is, you’d think elevator music would be more common in actual elevators.

    • LCP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Some hotel elevators have it.

      But yeah, I don’t recall the last time I heard music in a residential elevator.

    • @GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 year ago

      It’s like porn, they all used to have music, and now people still make jokes about how bad it was but it’s just gone now

    • @knotthatone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I don’t think I can actually recall one either.

      Maybe in a department store or mall in the 80s. It was just so deliberately bland I never noticed when it became less common.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not as common as it used to be, but I think the point was kind of that you’re not supposed to notice it?

      Look into “muzak” (the style of music. Apparently it’s also a brand according to Google), and some of Brian Eno’s ambient albums like “Music for Airports” (which is definitely a bit more sparse than elevator music, which was often like smooth jazz versions of classic songs), but along similar lines.

      I don’t like to think I’m that old, and I 100% remember elevator music.

      Edit: was possibly thinking of “musique concrete” rather than muzak.

      • @Triple_B@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        or more recently, ads

        Try this one trick to get me to take the stairs every single time.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I worked in an office that installed music in the bathrooms. It wasn’t there for a long time, and then they added it. An email went out at one point instructing people to stop turning off the music (someone figured out where the Sonos controls were I guess). Someone at the top had decided it was IMPERATIVE to have something to listen to other than the coworker grunting next to you.

  • @Pretzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    That actually might make elevator and phone hold music survivable - continual compositions that never repeat

  • @Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    I mean Obama is not wrong, but I hope the rest of his thoughts are that it will be as good as the artists he quoted as it absolutely will one day. Unsure when as there is an uncanny valley to cross. He did say this right and it was not just a get off my front lawn comment…right?

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’s wrong in the sense that Bob Dylan and Stevie Wonder are just as much cultural reflections as they are artists. Popular art and celebrity are effectively inseparable. This is why each generation often doesn’t “get” the popular art of others.

      The reality is that there’s nothing stopping an AI from becoming a celebrity, and I’m a bit surprised it hasn’t happened yet. Once that happens, the art it produces will be lauded, and people who are not the direct participants in mainstream popular culture will be confused and in some cases upset or offended by it. And the wheel will continue to turn.

  • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    AI is new and already performing in office to a second year law student level.

    That’s what I got from this.

    Also the Secret Invasion intro looked really cool and I hate it but it did. When it comes to depth and meaning it may be a while yet before AI can simulate or bullshit it’s way through that but for now it can definitely create interesting and noteworthy pieces.

    • What is notable that there is a unique culture of making human covers of popular AI based songs. Especially in the vocaloid scene. Same with auto tune and similar tools.

      AI isn’t going to take the jobs of musicians. It’ll just give them more material to work with because people will always seem out “authentic” versions of things they like.

    • @Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Could you even imagine the necessary programming to create a thing like Bobby Zimmerman, a brilliant songwriter that can’t even sing, but made of go of it anyways and is regarded as one of the best singers of the last half of the previous century regardless?

    • @lledrtx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      AI researcher (PhD) here and for what it’s worth, Obama got it extremely right. I saw this and went “holy shit, he gets it”

      • @gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah I dont believe you at all. I got my master in AI 8 years ago and have been working in the field ever since and no one with any knowledge would agree with you at all. In fact I showed a couple of my colleagues the headline of this article and they both just laughed.

      • @Azhad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        If you don’t think ai will get there and surpass everything humans have done in the past, you should change career.

        • @lledrtx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          I’m saying this because I do this for a living. It has become obvious to everyone in research (for example - https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00059) that "AI"s don’t understand what they are outputting. The secret sauce with all these large models is the data scale. That is, we have not had real algorithmic breakthroughs - it’s just model scale and data scale. So we can make models that mimic human language and music etc but to go beyond, we need multiple fundamentally different breakthroughs. There is a ton of research attention now so it might happen, but it’s not guaranteed - the improvements we’ve seen in the past few years will plateau as data plateaus (we are already there according to some, i.e we’ve used all the data on the Internet). Also, this - https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17493v2

          • @Azhad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You do it for a living and you can’t even understand what a general ai is. Alas I long since understood that mostly everyone is profoundly incompetent at their own jobs.

    • @Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Because he’s a world leader and AI programs are answering search engine queries with what you want to hear now, not actual answers. Ain;t no way hes unaware that.

    • setVeryLoud(true);
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Because we often look up to public figures for stuff they are not qualified to comment on.

        • @Inmate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you saying that Barack Obama and Dr. Dre both are equally unqualified to talk about “AI”? What other similarities do they share that makes you reach for Dr. Dre so quickly? Do you believe that Obama or Dre are incapable of interacting with computers or understanding computer science? Do you think that people who look like “thugs” to a person like you might be capable of learning and performing complex tasks?

      • @Inmate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        If he’s an unqualified bystander, then what the fuck are you?

        I’m always surprised that the people with all the answers only share them with thirty other assholes on the Internet.

        I’m confident a 14 year old can write their own AI, maybe even a smart 10 year old.

        Here’s instructions for kids:

        https://youtu.be/XJ7HLz9VYz0?si=1QN3fqT03HSMufib

        You think Obama can’t wrap his head around a little algebra?

        Why, when speaking intelligently and thoughtfully in the subject, is he so wrong in his assessment, when you, in one lazy sentence, are so right?

        I’m really worried about would-be wise people just throwing in the towel cause they don’t know how much better they could be with a little discipline, and settle for being clever here and there.

    • @Inmate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Because you can teach a teen to do it in two weeks. He was a constitutional law professor, as well as the first elected African-American president in the United States. I learned LLMs in a couple months and I never used a comp until 2021. Why are you gatekeeping?

      • @Daxtron2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Using the end product and having any idea how it works are two VERY different things.

        • @Inmate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          I agree, my argument is that both aren’t challenging for even the average person if they really want/need to understand how these models produce refined noise informed by human patterns.

          There are electricians everywhere you know.

          This isn’t a random person thoughtlessly yelling one-sentence nonsense pablum on the Internet like you.

          You think this person can’t understand something as straightforward as programming, coming from law?

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

          Please link your Wikipedia below 🫠

          • @Daxtron2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            It’s a bit more complicated than you’re making it out to be lmfao, there’s a reason it’s only really been viable for the past few years.

            • @skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              The principles are really easy though. At its core, neural nets are just a bunch of big matrix multiplication operations. Training is still fundamentally gradient descent, which while it is a fairly new concept in the grand scheme of things, isn’t super hard to understand.

              The progress in recent years is primarily due to better hardware and optimizations at the low levels that don’t directly have anything to do with machine learning.

              We’ve also gotten a lot better at combining those fundamentals in creative ways to do stuff like GANs.

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    “AI can’t do [thing]” *AI does thing* “Well AI can’t do [other thing]” *AI does other thing* “Yeah, well AI doesn’t have soul (or some other nebulous thing)”

    We can’t just dismiss rapidly improving AI and ignore the coming consequences. Things like “soul” or any other element that is considered human never mattered when it came to commercial music. A lot of radio hits are quickly-produced trash, with perhaps a catchy tune, and little in the way of meaningful lyrics. If it’s considered “good enough” (i.e. it makes money) then that’s all that is needed for a company. Don’t fool yourself into thinking the artistry ever mattered in this context.

    • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This is the reality a lot of people don’t want to face, a huge amount of popular music is just established patterns put together in the way music school teaches is the right way then pushed with endless hype from the money hungry corporations.

      We are absolutely going to see a kid in his bedroom use AI to make a concept album that resonates with people and garners popular acclaim - I don’t know when it will happen but I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it’s this decade.

      People used to say that same nonsence about samplers and drum machines, it’s the same trend as when people said Shakespeare isn’t poetry because he hadn’t been trained in Latin and Greek enough or Cezanne wasn’t a real artist, or a million other times people have confidently declared we’re at the end of history and nothing new will ever be good.

      What people need to remember is when they see Rick Astley singing his heart out it’s lyrics written by Pete Waterman and music from session artists put together by university trained professionals to shift units - soulless music has been a thing for a long time and no one ever cared before.

      Obsessive kids have been making great music in their bedroom for decades now, aphex twin gets industry acclaime for twiddling some knobs and so will whoever gets popular doing the equivalent interesting things with AI.

  • @gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    LMAO, what an absolutely god awful take.

    Ill see you in 2 years when we have our first AI Grammy winner