• reflex
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yawn.

    Let me know when we get a real Terminator or Matrix or Space Odyssey situation.

  • teft
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I for one welcome our new robotic super intelligence overlords.

  • Amir
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    The whole organization structure & how it functions is just not so smart after all. Have management team considered the Lean Methodology with their business objectives?

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The problem that precipitated all this is that they don’t have business objectives. They have a “mission.” The board of directors of OpenAI aren’t beholden to shareholders, and though the staff mocked their statement that allowing the company to be destroyed “would be consistent with the mission” it’s actually true.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      CEO ousting shenanigans = 📉

      Release rumor = 📈

      They’re not publicly traded, but I assume public sentiment still has an effect on things (ex. Partnerships, users buying memberships, etc.)

  • ShaunaTheDead
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    Who the hell would have guessed that we’d have to deal with not one but two potentially civilization ending threats in our lifetimes? I want off this crazy ride please!

    • @boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      self replicating the propaganda?

      You can’t self-replicate anything other than yourself. You replicate things; we use “self-replicating” because it’s shorthand for “thing that replicates itself.”

  • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Alright, so the article really doesn’t prove anything, just says OpenAI claims something and then fills it with words.

    Let’s be clear here; we don’t even have an AGI. That is to say, artificial general intelligence, a man-made intelligence that is at least as capable and general purpose as Human intelligence.

    That would be a intelligence that is self aware and can actually think and understand. Data from Star Trek would be an AGI.

    THESE motherfuckers are now claiming they made a breakthrough on potentially creating an SI, a super intelligence. An artificial, man-made intelligence that not only has the self awareness and understanding of an AGI, but is vastly more intelligent than a Human, and likely has awareness that surpasses Human awareness.

    I think not.

  • ZILtoid1991
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    The “superintelligence” in question: the same old tech, but with a larger context window, which will make it hallucinate a bit less often.

    • @kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Not really.

      If it’s name is Q* then it seems likely that it’s a combination of Q learning and A* search, which indicates that this is an approach similar to DeepMind’s AlphaZero as opposed to a transformer based LLM.

      In that context, getting it to be able to solve high school level math questions is pretty nuts.

      Though the details matter and right now all the articles discussing it are missing those, so we’ll have to wait and see.

  • RiikkaTheIcePrincess
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Why do I keep looking at these threads? The way people talk about this stuff on all sides is so asinine. Nearly every good point is accompanied by missing a big one or just ricocheting off the good one, flying off into space and hitting a fully automated luxury gay space commulist. Hopes, dreams, assumptions, and ignorance all just headbutting each other and getting nowhere.

    Oh yeah, I wanted to know what “superintelligence” was and whether I should care. Welp.

    • @Dadifer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I think the takeaway is that they’re trying to create a LLM that can answer questions that it wasn’t trained on.

  • @Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Connecting superintelligence to the board’s recent actions, which Sutskever initially supported, might be a stretch.

    Why do you do that in your headline then?