• z3rOR0ne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    *Laughs with RSS feeds, Invidious redirects, Newpipe and Sponsorblock.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Something I didn’t even realize I wanted was to not have some eyeball-pulling algorithm recommending things to me. It’s lovely.

        • HarkMahlberg
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Now if only Piped wouldn’t error out and be unusable for 10 minutes at a time every couple hours…

            • HarkMahlberg
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have been trying to figure out why since I started using it… searches spin forever, videos spin forever, some videos just spit “Error 1003” immediately, and then they become accessible 10 minutes later. I even tried filing an issue to no avail. I may end up looking for other alternatives.

                • HarkMahlberg
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I have, but the ones I tried weren’t much better. I looked again and there’s a few new ones, so I’ll try those and update if they work faster/more consistently.

      • @Salix@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s why I’ve been using YouTube without logging in and if using in browser, I have the cookies autodelete after I close the page to start new each time.

        It never really recommended me what I wanted anyway. I guess the algorithm doesn’t work on me.

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My biggest problem with the ads is that it’s louder than the thing I’m watching, oftentimes a lot.

    They are sometimes an hour long and I gotta press the skip ad button with my nose cause it’ll take me ten minutes or more to clean up.

    I have no love for the automatic gadgets where you can speak your commands. They get suggested by my coworkers quite a bit.

    They want too much for what is ultimately hours of people playing chess.

    (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

    • Nix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Theyre also blatant scams. Whenever I accidentally open youtube on my phone when clicking a link the ad is literally claims of free money using ai voices of celebrities, “cures” for blindness that are selling watered down bleach, and other scams

      • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah any time I scroll through YT Shorts (Revanced doesn’t block those ads rn) 99+% of the ads are just the “This new government program gives everyone $6400/month trust this bad AI voice of Steve Harvey.” scams.

  • @JoShmoe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Despite their wasted efforts, it just doesn’t matter. Circumventing all this is still too easy. Only the impatient are doomed.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Google has admitted its efforts to discourage the use of ad blockers now includes delaying the start of videos – a deliberate “suboptimal viewing” experience, as the corporation put it.

    Earlier this year, YouTube began interrupting videos for those using advert blockers with a pop-up encouraging them to either disable the offending extension or filter, or pay for YT’s ad-free premium tier.

    In a statement to The Register, Google admitted it was intentionally making its content less binge-able for users unwilling to turn off offending extensions, though this wasn’t linked to any one browser.

    To be clear, Google’s business model revolves around advertising, and ad blockers are specifically called out as being in violation of its terms of service.

    Google told us users who have uninstalled their ad blockers may continue to experience temporary delays loading videos, though the issue should resolve itself after “refreshing their browser.”

    As we reported earlier this month, the search giant will be pushing ahead with a planned API change in June that will render legacy Chrome extensions – including ad blockers – useless unless they are overhauled.


    The original article contains 468 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • The Uncanny Observer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 year ago

    Are they, though? I’ve been using Firefox and uBlock Origin for years and I’ve not had an issue other than needing to manually update my filters three times since this started.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t seem to be working for me. I’ve never been blocked for using ad blockers. It’s still the same speed it’s always been. I have all these work arounds just waiting to be used that I haven’t even had to actually try.

    Are they only doing this shit to like 12 people who write articles about it? Why wouldn’t it be globally done all at once for everyone?

    • @twack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Yes, they are rolling these changes out in stages to make it harder for the internet to collectively address the issue.

      Trust me, you will get hit eventually.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t seem to be making it harder; shit’s in the news all the time and damn near every discussion on those articles has work arounds mentioned constantly.

        If it ever does hit me, as previously stated, I have several solutions already lined up. Not least of which is simply using Piped. Which I could just use now, even without getting screwed… 🤔

        • @twack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s the point my friend. The articles and the resolutions are mudying the water. Which is easier:

          Finding one post that states “on October 12th, my adblocker stopped working and the resolution was to update the block lists.”

          Searching three months of varied news articles all related to the issue and with completely different resolutions.

    • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Personally I don’t watch it in the Browser instead I use the AndroidTV app.
      Amd I am patient in that regard. Can’t scare me with a 5sec delay.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Why can’t people just stop using google? Genuinely curious

    • @Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Because most alternatives aren’t nearly as functional due to them dominating the market.

      • @cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yes alternate platforms with good level of UX exists. But without content its no good. YouTube - Peertube Google maps - Organic maps & OSMAnd (open street maps) Reddit - Lemmy (bigger is better)

        • Alex
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          For the others, maybe. But YouTube? It’s strength is in the sheer amount of content. It’s going to take a lot of time and resources to create and host that content on the fediverse.

    • @Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      It is frightfully expensive to host video content. YouTube would cost Billions per year to run.

      • @jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I always wonder about this. I pay only a few bucks per month for Nebula. I highly suspect Nebula is running at a loss.

        • @Jaigoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Not necessarily. Nebula operates at a far, far smaller scope, with an emphasis on quality of videos over quantity, and every user is a paid user. If every user of YouTube was paying a couple bucks per month, they’d be making in the high tens of billions of dollars of revenue per year, several times more than they do with ads. Plus YouTube has a ridiculously huge amount of essentially worthless videos because literally anyone can upload a 10 hour video, so surely their hosting costs are higher per user than Nebula.

        • @LibreFish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Subscriptions are really lucrative. Iirc most ads pay like 0.1-0.5 cents per view, so you’d need to watch an insane amount of videos to equal the cost of a $2 subscription. I could probably make a site that brings in money if I had 5 $2 subscribers and a half 100 medium quality vids. Start scaling that up and it can be really profitable while offering subscribers a fair shake.

    • zeroxxx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      So what is equal or better alternative than Google Maps, Youtube and Google Search?

      • @archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        OpenStreetMap instead of Google Maps (OSM would be even better if more people used and actively contributed mapping data to it), no real youtube alternative yet (but see Piped/Invidious, Peertube, and Odysee), and there’s plenty of alternative search engines like Duckduckgo, Brave search (has its own index), etc

      • Fric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        there is no such “better” alternative. how could we compare a company that has been digging up their user data and built something with it, vs some community or even a solo developer who build something out of nowhere without collecting or selling data?

        but, what are the alternative?

        Google Maps

        • OpenStreetMap, is not as complete as Google Map, the amount of places won’t be the same. but it’s enough to help you navigating from a district to another district, and use much lower resource too

        YouTube

        • Odysee, couldn’t explain, think of it like YouTube
        • Rumble, couldn’t explain, think of it like YouTube
        • PeerTube, a fediverse software where you can upload videos and do livestream, you own your data
        • Piped, NewPipe, PipePipe, Invidious are just alternative frontend for YouTube, its good if you are watching an exclusive content from their platform. But why do we keep letting YouTube has our data?

        Google Search

        wow, really?

        1. DuckDuckGo, controversial, but enough
        2. Brave Search, controversial, honestly aint using it
        3. Searx, host it yourself, you own your data

        and hey, why didn’t you mention about the browser, mails, and many more? There is firefox, tuta, and much more.

      • @ryan_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I started ditching google apps last spring and my “alternatives” are: bing/apple maps, invidious, and SearXNG. I self-host the last two to keep even more control of my data.

      • bruhduh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using duckduckgo for half a year already they’ve became quite good compared to Google search, Google maps alternative is any popular maps app just try what’ll fit your tastes, but YouTube is certainly don’t have alternatives YET just because libre alternatives though exist but not yet in shape enough (basically we need datahoarders who’ll hoard and host whole youtube to libre alternatives such as framatube and others) for now we can only rely to custom frontends such as clipious, piped and others and custom apps of course

    • BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Revealed preferences. As much as people won’t admit it, these services do provide legitimate value, and they also cost a lot of money to operate.