cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12876226

The measure that sailed unanimously through the House Energy and Commerce Committee would prohibit TikTok from US app stores unless the social media platform — used by roughly 170 million Americans — is quickly spun off from its China-linked parent company, ByteDance.

US officials have cited the widespread commercial availability of US citizens’ data as another source of national security risk. The US government and other domestic law enforcement agencies are also known to have purchased US citizens’ data from commercial data brokers.

    • dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      North American politics don’t work like that. We all know there are gigantics gaps in the reasoning behind everything. Domestic companies do the same damn thing, but a part of that money has already gone into someone’s pocket, because lobbying is a huge part of the decision making process

    • @bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      541 year ago

      Not to mention this does nothing. ByteDance could easily just stand up a shell company with a puppet in another country and have it become the owner. Our lawmakers and regulators are fucking morons.

  • Dark Arc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a misleading headline. It mandates that Tiktok be sold if it’s to continue operating in the US.

    Which honestly I support. It’ll probably just be sold. Even if it’s not, the CCP should not have a direct pipeline to feed US citizens whatever they want (even if they’re allegedly “not using it for that”).

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All the CCP has to do is buy advertising. If Russia can swing a presidential election with Facebook then so can the CCP. None of this makes any sense unless we actually hold executives accountable for the actions of their companies. No more second chances after admitting to Congress that they flaunted the law almost continuously from the last time Congress caught them.

  • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    This may sound like a rhetorical question but I promise it’s sincere.

    Why would I be more concerned about China having my data than when the US has the potential to collect that same data AND MUCH MORE through surveillance that we know they do? My own government has a much higher potential to do me harm than one on the other side of the world.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Saw another post that had many great points. What if TikTok leaned into propaganda, topics like reunification with Taiwan? I promise that will effect us, big time.

      • @Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        China absolutely doesn’t want the US talking about Taiwan or the island of Taipei at all. They want the West to forget it exists entirely so they can “reunify” with it the same way they squashed out Democracy Riots in Hong Kong once the west got bored and stopped paying attention.

        • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It already happened in other countries. Philippines and Indonesia elected their old dictators after a successful campaign on TikTok to whitewash their crimes so that Gen Z vote for them.

      • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        I agree that would be problematic.

        However I’m not willing to allow the government to ban a social media platform that a lot of people enjoy and rely on for community building (or even their livelihoods, in a lot of creators’ cases) on a “what if”.

        Think about the precedent this sets. What could it be used on next?

        • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          In case I’m being downvoted because you think I’m worried about a slippery slope for no reason, I’ll link the full text of the bill here.

          The process is basically that the president determines that an app is an issue, notifies Congress (who does not need to give approval), then within a certain time period the foreign owner of the all must divest ownership or it would become illegal to distribute that app.

          There are definitions laid out in the text. I see nothing that would stop them from banning foreign news sources or potentially foreign shopping platforms except for the clause about “permits a user to create an account or profile to generate, share, and view text, images, videos, real-time communications, or similar content”, which could be broadly interpreted.

          Do you really want to give the executive branch basically unchecked power to limit our access to voices from outside the country?

          https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521/text?format=txt&r=1&s=1

          • @pastabatman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I think you’re farther down that slippery slope than you think you are. We have more access to foreign voices from outside the country than we’ve ever had in history. A lot of that is through social media owned by US companies who are not the target of this legislation.

            Twitter has been pretty instrumental in swaying public favor to the Palestinians in Gaza despite Israel (a US ally) trying to paint a different narrative. Now imagine if Twitter was owned by an Israeli company. Would we see all those horrific pictures and videos in Gaza? Would we even know if we weren’t seeing them? Would we have any legal or legislative options if we did uncover feed manipulation?

            I think maybe the reason you aren’t fully on board with this is that you seem to have a strong distrust of the US government. More than our foreign adversaries. That’s fair and you are entitled to that. The people on the other side of the issue trust the US government more than foreign adversaries and that changes the calculation.

        • @FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Can it be used on conservatives and fascists? Can we use it to destroy right wing media outlets and overthrow the 1996 Telecommunications Act? Can we use it to band together and hunt down evangelicals who commit child abuse through radical indoctrination? Can we use it to hunt down corporate lobbyists and the Congressmen who take their bribes?

    • @erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I can insult Trump and Biden on social networks, travel to the US then travel back alive to my home country.

      I wouldn’t try that with China.

    • @m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      As an individual I’d rather be giving my data to China who probably have no interest in me personally, rather than a Five Eyes country who want my data to spy on me, and have more interest in persecuting me, stopping me at borders, etc.

    • @pastabatman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Because China has interests that are in opposition to US interests, and they can sway US opinion any way they want by covertly manipulating the feed. They absolutely can do significant harm with this, including but not limited to selecting politicians, inciting chaos and political unrest, and even economic destabilization. I’m not sure that the US government actually has a much higher potential to do you harm than a foreign enemy of the US with a weapon like social media as you stated. You could make a strong argument that the political shitshow we are currently in is partially due to foreign interference through social media, and that is before they owned the actual platforms. The US government is not incentivized to destabilize itself at least.

    • @force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      probably because China is a foreign country and the US is (presumably) where you reside, and you should apparently trust your own government only. but i don’t know exactly what a foreign government would want with your personal data anyways

    • @Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Each country has the right to say if businesses or entities of a foreign country can operate in their borders. The US Govt is rarely directly involved with operationing a company or business, with the biggest exception being the US Postal Service. So while they might make rules and regulations for how companies can do business, these businesses are privately owned, what information they gather on clients or users is for commercial use, typically for advertising purposes.

      With Chinese companies, this is not the case, even companies that are technically privately owned are heavily managed by the CCP if not directly operated or owned by an official member of the govt. So while in the US if a company like Instagram or Twitter was told by the US govt to hand over information about certain individuals, without a warrent clearly defining what data to hand over and the reason for it, those companies can and in the past repeatedly have used legal means to resist and deny those demands. This isn’t a thing n China, and there is a lot of rumors that all the data these Chinese originating platforms collect by default goes to the Chinese govt, who can use it for anything from espionage, using insider information gathered illegally to manipulate markets or officials, to even things like blackmail or planning military actions in extreme cases. The CCP and all their associated companies have repeatedly shown in the past they don’t care about the rights of citizens in other countries, copyright laws or intellectual rights, and would be more than happy to turn every teenagers smart phone into a listening device into peoples homes and tailor content shown to individuals they identified as someone they can manipulate to radicalize them in a manner that suits them without any regard to that persons wellbeing.

      If you think the US Government is untrustworthy (which, yeah it’s not) then you should be absolutely horrified at the thought of ever allowing the Chinese Govt and the CCP having access to any of your personal life or allowed to put software on your device and partake in a social network they curate and moderate.

  • @degen@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I, for one, only want domestic adversaries abusing my personal information. Actual rocks and fence posts are smarter than this.

  • Verdant Banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    our minimum wage is $7.25, no universal health care, the cops are militarized and keeping citizens in their proper places, food/ housing costs are more than our pay, transportation costs have skyrocketed, the postal service needs attention, we have fifty states not working together

    but we showed that China TikTok what for BY GOD! they ain’t gonna spy on us

      • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The cyber security professional inside of me wants to agree with you. The Liberal in me doesn’t want to give the government the authority to ban speech and what citizens are allowed to watch.

        • @los_chill@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Same. Just make it so Tiktok cannot advertise to American users or monetize American views. Start with that and wait for another non-ccp app to take that market.

          Edit: Curious why every seems to disagree.

        • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          It’s proven propaganda. And a proven method of spying/gathering info.

          I’m fine with the government removing it.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            So you’re going to shut down YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, etc as well right? Considering they all do the same thing and FB even interfered in an election?

            • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If they start stealing information for china? Yes. I’d suggest we shut them down too.

              See? I’m not so reliant on social media that I’m willing to sacrifice my security for them.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        So you’re going to shut down YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, etc as well right? Considering they all do the same thing and FB even interfered in an election?

      • @Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        are we going to ban youtube as well? which has more than tiktok? or lemmy for that matter? or any other forms of social media?

        people who fear monger tiktok make me worry that they fail to see the bigger picture.

        tiktok isn’t the problem. the fact that propaganda is monetized is the problem. and banning tiktok will fix nothing whatsoever.

          • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            How do you differentiate purposeful manipulation vs it being a natural effect of Western social media? I stopped using Facebook and Twitter because it was obviously toxic and affecting my mental health. I use TikTok a fair amount and don’t find it nearly as bad.

            It’s also possible that there’s manipulation in the other direction. In their own app they could be artificially increasing positive content while allowing the natural social media toxicity and ragebait to dominate in other areas.

            My personal opinion is that TikTok is a way that peer to peer information and news travels very quickly in a way that they can’t control, and they don’t like that. As with all things, they want to keep us isolated.

              • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I’m not here to be pro-china, and I definitely believe that they’re putting those things in douyin. I’m just not convinced they’re purposefully putting negative things in TikTok purposefully to harm mental health.

                This is anecdotal and my personal experience, but I haven’t noticed any pro-ccp things on my personal algorithm. What I do notice is anti-US and anti-capitalist content by Americans. Whether or not they are shills, I can’t say for sure, but it feels like it would border on conspiracy theory thinking to suggest that many of them are.

                To clarify the isolation comment, I mean that TikTok is a place where community building and the spreading of ideas or news (not necessarily good or bad ideas/news) spreads rapidly, especially among young people, in a way the people who run traditional media can’t control. Taking away this tool makes us more reliant on forms of media that they do control.

      • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        so is instagram and facebook but you don’t see people rabidly want to ban them.

              • HACKthePRISONS
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                tiktok and Facebook use in the US have nothing to do with anything you are rambling about.

                Facebook manufactures consent for the military industrial complex and capitalist interests and since it is not overtly controlled by Lockheed or the Pentagon, it’s propaganda is more sinister. at least you know who pulls the strings at tiktok

          • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            yes they are run by the us empire, which has a more violent history.

            still not seeing the point of banning one over the other

              • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                the real enemy of the world is the US by a long shot. what the US does warrants invasions and wars on 3rd world countries by the US, the same isnt true for china.

                no country has such a dark and murderous history. my country is on that list and we are suffering from the consequences still, decades later.

                and yes, having people die of starvation in one of the poorest countries in the planet is sadly expected. no system of government can fix a country that huge overnight.

                banning shit like tiktok like you have a huge moral highground is hypocritical at best when US apps are doing it all around the planet.

                e: how could i forget the genocide you are sponsoring

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      the legislation that needs to get passed, cannot, unless and until the house majority swings about 20 points the other way and the sliver of a majority in the senate is boosted by at least another 10.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      I am still semi convinced that the ban is really because there are a lot of tiktokers devoted to exposing trades and corruption of congress critters in near real time. Tiktok has a lot of flaws, but it’s great for finding breaking news.

      • @ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I’m there as well, but on a broader scale: I think they’re wanting to ban it because they don’t have a hotline to Xi so they can get shut shit down. Basically want it banned for doing the same things Google does, but the problem is it’s not run by their own Musk-on-a-Leash

        • @DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Pretty sure it’s the other way around, musk and zuck have congress on a leash. Especially musk since he has skynet and tesla and space x

          • @ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            All companies that are heavily involved with government contracts and subsidies. At least a Mexican standoff situation. There goes the George Carlin quote about clubs and who’s in them

    • GodlessCommie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Those are the issues they dont want us collectively talking about, sharing our lived experiences and how they dont line up with the bullshit our government is gaslighting us with

  • @iterable@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Never forget back during height of pandemic Zoom was actually caught routing all data through China. Said oops mistake and giggled. Hey look Tik Tok is evil and connected to China…but how much more evil then Facebook?..uhh CHINA!!

  • @Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Could see it effecting Ios devices but even then people will just use a browser. Not really going to effect pc and Android users will likely just sideload.

    So not really sure this would have any effect as it stands.

    • @lorkano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly it could affect it. People might just start using YouTube shorts or Instagram reels, they are not much worse than TikTok already

  • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    They know and we know that this is going nowhere. It’s got a very thin chance of being brought to a vote, let alone passing the whole House, and an even thinner chance of passing the Senate. There’s no way on this planet that Biden signs it. TikTok is just too powerful a campaigning platform.

  • GodlessCommie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Congress is after TikTok because it’s impacting corporate profits like the boycotts of Starbucks and McD has done. A place where we can collectively communicate with each other outside of the approved echo chambers. They can’t control how we act and think without being able to control the algorithm

  • @csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    If the same videos TikTok had were instead on YouTube shorts, would all you people be happy? What about if Meta had it? It’s pure nationalism and old people being scared of short form woke-ness.

    I believe every social media has a misinformation problem, but I’m not just pinning it on TikTok.

    Heck, our fear is the same reason we don’t have cheaper EVs. We say 'the CCP… ’ and poof less competition and shitter availability for Americans.

    I think it’s ridiculous. I could care less if the CCP knows what type of short form videos I like. I’m sure our government has the same type of data. Obviously users could care less too. Leave choice to the people: hence freedom.

    I believe in freedom of speech. Trying to take this (stupid) app away is a violation of it. I don’t care about who owns it or gets data from it.

    And no: I don’t regularly use TikTok.

    • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Its performative. There is at least logic in thinking that if TikTok had US ownership that it’d be more aligned to US interests but unless it was bought by a mega US corp, it’d likely just be a shell operation and nothing changes.

      Why single out TikTok and not Chinese nationals buying US real estate, driving up the cost of commercial and residential rents?

      • @furikuri@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Why single out TikTok and not Chinese nationals buying US real estate, driving up the cost of commercial and residential rents?

        Heavily agree that this is equally problematic, but unfortunately it seems like the choice has already been made that real estate “investments” cannot be allowed to fail. It’s the same reason why they aren’t also targeting US-based companies that have been shown to have ties to foreign rivals, they’re literally just playing politics. Sucks, but for now this at least opens the door for further regulation in the area

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      I mean YouTube has both a propaganda funnel into white supremacy and sales of data/advertising to the CCP.

      But it’s American right?

  • @Jamil@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Tiktok has been the only massively popular social media app that hasn’t censored pro-Palestinian content. I used to be against tiktok for it’s ties to China, but I’ve been convinced it’s important to maintain freedom of speech.

    • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      So you’re fine with yours and everyone else’s info being sent to china because they allow the type of speak that you like?

      • @Jamil@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So the choice is the American government having my data, which is fully committed to genocide, or the Chinese government which is speaking out against this genocide?

        Right now, China is the lesser evil.

        Take a page from capitalism, having competition is good for us consumers.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The “American” social media companies and data aggregators have repeatedly been caught selling your information to the CCP. The only difference is tiktok isn’t selling it to them.

            • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If any of that shit is true, I’d love to see ALL of shut the fuck down. So it looks like your whataboutsim failed yet again.

              • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                And yet Congress isn’t going after the “American” companies, just foreign ones. It’s not whataboutism to point out an action is entirely ineffective. And the real reason is to shut down competition.

                • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  How many times has Zuckerberg stood before politicians having to answer for his shit? How many FTC lawsuits are there now? San Francisco among many other cities/states have sued them.

                  Don’t make things out to be that Facebook is protected. You’re diluting the water to defend china.