With everything going on with Twitter and Reddit I feel like I have a new appreciation for having my own local knowledge base on Logseq.

Demo page: https://demo.logseq.com

  • @russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    This looks intriguing! I currently use BookStack as a documentation platform, but it seems Logseq might be a step above something like BookStack?

  • Jarmer
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    For those just glancing through: what would you define “knowledge management” as?

    • wrath-sedan
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The the Wikipedia article on personal knowledge management is a little dense, but basically it’s a way to keep track of everything you learn or consume and link them together to develop new ideas or insights. Sometimes people will call it a second or digital brain. There’s a lot of different ways to do it, and recently there’s been a lot of software like Logseq, Obsidian, and Notion, that facilitates linking everything together and keeping it organized using [[hyperlinks]] and #tags among other things.

      • ninjasquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        so to really dumb it down, is it basically like a digital version of a paper notebook, except that it can do more stuff?

        • Helvedeshunden
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The simplest forms are. Except hyperlinks are super powerful and unlike paper you can restructure and recomnect as you see fit. Since it is computer software, you can also get other benefits like a working to do-list next to your medicine list or machine learning indexing and cross-referencing your documents. Take a look at the Devonthink website for an idea of how idea management on steroids look. On the other end of the spectrum you have things like Obsidian where everything is simply stored in pure markdown text and synced by you how you see fit. There’s a solution for every temper these days.

        • zekiz
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Ehhh. Kinda? The feature that differentiates it from a normal notebook is the ability to link pages. You’re basically constantly searching for connections while building your own personal Wiki.

  • RNC
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Logseq is fantastic.

    The outline approach is great for quick note contributions without worrying about the look of the notes you’re trying to capture. Writing journal entries or pages is so seamless, and linking is so easy. Block references are also a powerful addition.

    The mobile version is lacking compared to say obsidian, but I’ve found it good as I’m not focused on propping up the application, rather focusing on my content/notes.

  • @chaercoffee@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    logseq is awesome but their mobile version is still very unstable and has no plugins, only custom css.

    • Bad3rOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I don’t really care much for plugin support on mobile as I can see it could cause more issues than help. I do hope the mobile app gets better though.

  • greatley
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    I won’t bother trying it out if it forces me to use chromium

    It seems that your browser doesn’t support the new native filesystem API, please use any Chromium 86+ based browser like Chrome, Vivaldi, Edge, etc. Notice that the API doesn’t support mobile browsers at the moment.

    • Bad3rOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      The dev team is working on replacing the filesystem API with another protocol supported by Firefox. That page is just a demo; you only need the support if you want to save your changes to the demo. You can try the desktop app via flathub.

      flathub install logseq
      
    • pootriarch
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      that tripped me up too - but it’s just the web demo. if you install it, your browser doesn’t matter

  • @jmf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    I use Logseq routinely. So useful when you set up daily templates to fill out for your day.

    • Bad3rOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      I don’t really make use of templates. I do love the journal. It makes it easy to jot things down.

      • @daluca@feddit.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        The journal is the biggest reason I move from Obsidian to using Logseq regularly. There is so much less friction just going to journal and writing ideas rather then figuring out where to add the note too before typing.

        • @zac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I haven’t used Logseq, but I’ve found trying to categorise notes in Obsidian made me use it less so I just rely on backlinks as tags and to create connections between notes and dump most things in the primary vault folder. I’ve gotten comfortable journaling using daily notes with templates.

    • wrath-sedan
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Both are pretty versatile and make use of local markdown files. Logseq is more ouliner/bulleted note focused, while Obsidian is paragraph first (but with plugins for either you can really modify this quite a bit). Another difference is Obsidian organizes things into folders, while Logseq’s organization is flatter and more reliant on tags and hyperlinks to connect things (although you can nest pages, for instance having pages like this: pets, pets/cats, pets/dogs). Obsidian is more stable with a larger plugin ecosystem, but Logseq is being very rapidly developed and the dev team is super responsive.

      Finally, Logseq is open source, while Obsidian is not. Their monetization models are pretty similar too, with the free version of both being really generous and limited features like Logseq/Obsidian-native Sync being available for a $5 monthly subscription. I regularly use both and encourage you to check them both out and explore what works for you.

  • Recollectr
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Another alternative, admittedly not open-source, is Recollectr (disclaimer: built by me.)

    Recollectr was inspired by prior projects like Notational Velocity but aims to be a lot more - omnibox, markdown support, reminders; and for paid users: revisions, note-linking, and sync. I built it because I felt like other note-taking apps just weren’t fast enough and they broke my concentration.

    It’s quite late here but I’d be happy to answer any questions tomorrow!

    • Helvedeshunden
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I was just checking out the site on my iPad. Only the top image loads and the rest are white boxes. I disabled all content blockers and reloaded but the problem persisted. It might still be a local problem, but now you have a heads-up that something MIGHT be wrong.

      • Recollectr
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Thanks very much for letting me know; I’ll look into this! They’re all videos so perhaps there’s some encoding issue with Safari on iOS.

  • Brayd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Using it and I love it! Can definitely recommend it!

  • @t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I love Logseq! When I first started using it, I was categorizing all my notes as I was slowly moving over my knowledge base. And over time, I’ve switched over to using the Journal more and more! It’s extremely well done.

  • pootriarch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    i’d never heard of this concept! i have a disorganized stack of markdown files - notes, to-do and packing lists - that this looks ideal to tame

  • crowsby
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I had no idea such a thing existed, thanks for posting! I currently use Notion at work, which is similar, but this looks promising for home use.