• @Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    496 months ago

    See? AI creates jobs! Granted, it’s specialized mop up situations, but jobs!

    It’ll be even more interesting in the future! Every now and then a T1000 will lose all hydraulic fluids right out it’s prosthetic anus and they’ll need someone there with a mop and bucket! Our economy lives on…

    • @andxz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      If by economy you mean some of us are needed to mop up hydraulic ass-juices at gunpoint I suppose you’re technically correct. At least they have to feed us, right?

      …right?

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Having spent most of my career working as a senior contractor, which often meant landing on code bases with 3+ layers of fuckups, I can only imagine how painful it will be to end up having to clean and fix AI generated code, since that doesn’t even have a consistent coding style or pattern of design errors and bugs.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    206 months ago

    I have a lot of empathy for a lot of people. Even ones, who really don’t deserve it. But when it comes to people like these, I have absolutely none. If you make a chatbot do your corporate security, it deserves to burn to the ground

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    Good. Maybe if the stuff trashes enough of our infrastructure somebody somewhere will actually figure out that it’s bad and get rid of it forever.

    I know, it’ll never happen. But a man can dream.

    • @foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -16 months ago

      trashes enough of our infrastructure somebody somewhere will actually figure out that it’s bad and get rid of it forever

      thinking Neoliberlism.

  • @yrmp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    826 months ago

    Lmao my job announced layoffs a few months back. They continue to parade their corporate restructuring plan in front of us like we give a fuck if shareholders make money. My output has dropped significantly as I search for another role. Whatever code I do write now is always just copy pasted from AI (which is getting harder to use…fuck you Copilot). I give zero fucks about this place anymore. Maybe if people had some small semblance of investment in their company’s success (i.e.: not milked by shareholders and beaten to dust by shitty profit driven metrics that take away from the core business), the employees might give enough fucks to not copy paste shitty third party code.

    Additionally, this is a training issue. Don’t offload the training of your people onto the universities (which then trap the students into an insurmountable debt load leading them to take jobs they otherwise wouldn’t want to take just to eat and have a roof over their heads). The modern corporate landscape has created a perfect shitstorm of disincentives for genuine effort and diligence. Then you expect us to give a shit about your company even though the days of 40 years and a pension are now gone. We’re stuck with 401k plans and social security and the luck of the draw as to whether we can retire or not. Work your whole life for what? Fuck you. I’m gonna generate that AI code and enjoy my 30s and 40s.

    A workforce trapped by debt, forced to prioritize job security and paycheck size over passion or purpose. People end up in roles they don’t care about, working for companies they have no investment in, simply to keep up with loan payments and the ever increasing cost of living.

    “Why is my organization falling apart!?” Fucking look up from the stupid fucking metrics that don’t actually tell you anything you dumb fucks. Make an actual human decision and fix the wealth inequality. It’s literally always wealth inequality.

    • ozoned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      206 months ago

      15 years ago I got a job where I wasn’t allowed to do anything. I hated it. I wanted to learn and be valuable and be valued. I left that job.

      I worked for a bank and then Red Hat and I loved what I did and burned myself out trying to make them happy. Only to find out they still didn’t value me.

      I switched jobs two years ago and increased my pay 30% overnight and back to a job doing nothing. And I’m totally fine with it now. I have a family and I focus on them and during work, if they don’t have anything for me to do I make my own happiness.

      Fuck corporations. I’ll take your money, I’ll never again kill myself as I’ll never be valued anyway. Jobs aren’t worth it. People are.

      • @yrmp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Similar trajectory for me, but I’m now being micromanaged on the daily. We got a new CIO recently who is micromanaging his direct reports and our culture has evaporated overnight. The shit is indeed rolling down hill and the writing is on the wall to leave. I know it’s not just me either. There will be an exodus when rates get cut and hiring picks up again. This place is fucked.

        But that’s the key. If you can find something and lay low with minimal annoyance, hang onto that for as long as you can.

      • @KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        I told my manager that I’ve been burned and can’t make myself work hard for another company again. She’s leaving so there’s no vested interest in the company for her. But yeah, fuck these cunts.

    • @AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      406 months ago

      “People work in roles they don’t care about, for companies they have no investment in, to pay loans they shouldn’t have.”

      That sounds like a fight club quote lol. I know you didn’t say “loans they shouldn’t have” but the cost of college is just stupidly high. It doesn’t have to be free but come on.

      • @yrmp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        Chuck Palahniuk leaking into my writing like the carrot out of the protagonist’s ass in Guts.

      • Lemminary
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        It doesn’t have to be free but come on.

        I beg to differ! My degree was free for all intents and purposes, and no, it didn’t take away from the challenge or the quality of education. I cried blood tears in order to graduate but it was worth it.

      • @yrmp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        For me it’s the “Stop responding” button. Sometimes I’ll neglect something in my prompt, such as the fact that I’m stuck on ES5 javascript in my job (ServiceNow). It’ll spit out ES6+ with let declarations or something like that, and I have to go back and qualify my limitations. So I click stop responding. What used to happen was that it would stop and allow for additional prompting. Now it’s just like a client side trick. It hides the output but the server is still returning shit in the background, so if I try to re-prompt or add context it finishes what it was originally saying first, then tacks the new answer onto the old one without pause, separation, or human readable formatting that would indicate that there is a new output. It’s an awful experience.

        I’ve been using perplexity.ai but my company thinks its agreements will stop Microsoft from training their AIs on our proprietary data, so I have to be more careful with perplexity than Copilot.

  • @_sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    286 months ago

    “AI” is just good for simple code snippets. (Which it stole from Github repos).

    This whole ai bs needs to die already, and the people who lie about it held accountable.

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1016 months ago

    Good. This is digital Darwinism at its finest. Weeds out the companies who thought they could save money by relying on a digital monkey instead of actual professionals.

  • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 months ago

    The thing I dislike most about code assisting tools is that they’re geared to answering your questions instead of giving advice. I’m sure they also give bad recommendations but I’ve seen LLMs basically double down on bad code.

    • @Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      No they’re giving you exactly what you’re asking for. Problem is you’re not asking for advice. Your asking to “build a thing” and expecting it to read your mind.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      346 months ago

      I always claimed in job interviews to be good at debugging, but there are no certifications for debugging and there’s really no way for an interviewer to verify such a claim. So even though it is an incredibly important skill, companies just do not look for it. There is also the hilariously misguided belief that good coders do not produce bugs so there’s no need for debugging.

      • @affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        156 months ago

        There is also the hilariously misguided belief that good coders do not produce bugs so there’s no need for debugging.

        i’m terrified of people who think this way. my experience has been that they are much less inclined to check for bugs in their code and tend to produce much buggier code

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        There is also the hilariously misguided belief that good coders do not produce bugs so there’s no need for debugging.

        Yeah, fuck this specifically. I’d rather have a good troubleshooter. I work in live events; I don’t care if an audio technician can run a concert and have it sounding wonderful under ideal conditions. I care if they can salvage a concert after the entire fucking rig stops working 5 minutes before the show starts. I judge techs almost solely on their ability to troubleshoot.

        Anyone can run a system that is already built, but a truly good technician can identify where a problem is and work to fix it. I’ve seen too many “good” technicians freeze up and panic at the first sign of trouble, which really just tells me they’re not as good as they say. When you have a show starting in 10 minutes and you have no audio, you can’t waste time with panic.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Good programmers (and I don’t mean just at the coding level) make less bugs exactly because they want to avoid bug fixing as much as possible.

          They still have to do debugging - and hence have to be good at it - just less often than if they didn’t invest any time into figuring out ways of working that reduce the rate of bugs in their work (and, again, this is at more levels than just coding).

          I think that misconception of “good coders do not produce bugs” in anchored in the totally wrong idea that it’s at all possible to make code without bugs - the way I see it the path to being a “good coder” must go through being good at debugging and just wanting to avoid doing it as much because how how much more time it takes to have to go all the way down to using the debugger to find bugs than doing things like at least some analysis upfront of the program requirements, using proper naming conventions to reduce the likelihood of the kind of bugs that comes from confusing variables and structuring you code so that you don’t get lost or don’t forget things (especially for code you don’t see for months and later come back to having forgotten the logic you were following with it).

          I’ve done some programming without proper debuggers (embedded stuff in shitty shit microcontrollers, shader programming) and it’s a total PITA.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The pain in the arse which is debugging is what motivated me to, as my career progressed, improve my coding, improve my software design, improve my systems design, even improved my software development process and standards and eventually that even extended to getting those I worked with to also improving those things as I sometimes ended up having to debug their bugs.

      Debugging definitelly makes better techies, IMHO, mainly because of the lengths people will go to in order the avoid having to do it.

    • Suzune
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 months ago

      AI code is not clever. It’s all developers averaged. Even if it worked properly, you’d get average quality code.

      It’s rather lazy and cheap. This is where the quality is lacking.

        • Suzune
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          I don’t like the term “clever” in code, because sometimes it means “I’m too dumb to understand it”. Simply don’t touch clever code, unless you really understand it.

          Best example is the fast inverse square root function in Quake. Yeah… it’s clever, but replace it by simple maths and let Quake have performance problems.

          On the other hand, using AI for more than assisted coding is never clever. Some day some fuck will use it in medicine and will actually kill people. AI is not at fault here! It’s the programmer who killed a patient in this case by being irresponsible and lazy.

    • @Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      I’ve been laughing at this quote for 5 minutes straight

      It’s so good

      He knows he’s right

      Also: I code sometimes, and all of my code is of masterpiece quality. I cannot debug my own code, I ask for outside help and we have to dismantle the NT kernel to find out what’s gone wrong

  • @fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Debugging and maintenance was always the hardest aspect of large code bases… writing the code is the easy part. Offloading that part to AI only makes the hard stuff harder

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    696 months ago

    And none of the forced tech support “AI” replacements work. And the companies don’t give a shit.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      496 months ago

      I’ve had this argument with them a few times at work. They are definitely going to replace this all with AI. Probably within the next year and no amount of us pointing out that it won’t work and they’ll end up having to bring us back, at 3x the rate, seems to have any effect on them.

      I’m probably going to have to listen to a lot of arguments about this strawberry thing tomorrow.

      Anyway whatever, severance is severance.

      • @stringere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 months ago

        I was once in a similar position: company merger and they decided to move support offshore. We got 6 months lead notice and generous severance paid out as long as we stayed to the end. Fast forward a year and they took 85% customer approval to 13%. We got hired back at 1.5x our old pay rate, so not quite the 3x you mentioned. Hoping this works out similar for you in the end.

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    526 months ago

    If I was still in a senior dev position, I’d ban AI code assistants for anyone with less than around 10 years experience. It’s a time saver if you can read code almost as fluently as you can read your own native language but even besides the A.I. code introducing bugs, it’s often not the most efficient way. It’s only useful if you can tell that at a glance and reject its suggestions as much as you accept them.

    Which, honestly, is how I was when I was first starting out as a developer. I thought I was hot shit and contributing and I was taking half a day to do tasks an experienced developer could do in minutes. Generative AI is a new developer: irrationally confident, not actually saving time, and rarely doing things the best way.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Eh, I’m a senior dev, and I don’t ban it (my boss, the director, does that for me lol; he’s worried about company secrets leaking).

      In fact, we had an interview for a senior dev position, and the applicant asked if they could use AI, and I told them to use whatever tools they normally would for development. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that they totally botched the programming challenge because of it (introduced the same bug twice, then said they were very confident in the correctness of the code…), and that made it so much easier to filter them out from our hiring pool. If you’re going to use a tool in an interview, you better feel confident with it. If that dev had solved the problem significantly faster than our other applicants, I would’ve taken that to my boss to have the team experiment with it. We target budget 30 min for our challenges, and our seniors generally finish in under 20, and it took them more than our allotted time to get the code to actually run properly (and that’s with us pointing out certain mistakes the AI generated).

      But no, I haven’t seen an actually productive use of AI for software development, beyond searching for docs online (which you can totally do w/ Bing or Google w/o involving our codebase). You may feel more productive because more code is appearing on the screen, but the increase in bugs likely reduces overall productivity. We’re always looking for ways to improve, but when I can solve the same problem in my bare-bones editor (vim) faster than my more junior colleagues can with their fancy IDEs, I really don’t think AI is going to be the thing that improves our productivity, actually understanding logic will. If someone demonstrates that AI does save time, I’ll try it out and campaign for it.

      Anyway, that’s my take as someone who has been in the industry for something like 15 years. Knowing your tools is more important, IMO, than having more tools.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        I had my suspicions before but the moment I realized for certain Elon Musk couldn’t run a software company was when he judged people by lines of code written.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Ew, I would hate to be in charge of code reviews at an org like that.

          The proper metric is success of the actual product. We have our engineers give estimates, then hold them to those estimates and evaluate based on consistency of on-time releases and number of production bugs. At the end of the day, predictable, high quality delivery is usually more valuable than faster time to market, unless you’re in a startup or something and just need to get early adopters on-board. Judge QA by defects discovered in production and devs by defects found by QA and in production. It’s really not that hard.

        • @Wappen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          Not trying to defend him, but I thought the reasoning behind doing that was to get the least obedient people to leave the company so that there won’t be a delayed push back from the employees.

          • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            In my experience working for almost 3 decades in software development, passive-agressive shit from upper management just causes the best people to leave (as they’re the ones who easilly find better jobs) leaving behind mainly a mix of the incompetent and those who never worked anywhere else (who are either already incompetent or will become so, as only ever having worked in just one company is far too narrow professional experience for anything beyond junior/mid level - you need to have seen more than one way of doing things to understand certain higher level concerns and choices in software development).

            • @Wappen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Yeah and I’d say these people left are exactly those Elon wants, he doesn’t want white guys in their 50s, he wants obedient young guys.

              • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Sound like a variant of the good old saying “pay peanuts, get monkeys” only using a stick and threats instead of payment.

                Mind you, it does sound like the kind of think somebody with his kind of personality - narcissistic shameless and dishonest salesman - would think it’s a great idea.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The one time some manager voiced such an idea, I very overtly in front of everybody offered to make “loop unrolling” software working at the source level (compilers already do it at the Assembly level in some cases for performance) for me and my colleagues to really boost that code line count (while totally screwing maintenability).

          Mind you, all devs in that meeting were loudly against measuring performance by code lines, but I like to think that suggestion of mine really hammered down the coup the grace on that “brilliant” idea.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’ve worked as a freelancer (specifically as a Contractor) in Software Development for over a decade and more often than not I ended up having to work with some existing code base, having to deal with the design choices, coding style and bugs of somebody else, often multiple somebody elses.

      There’s nothing quite as “entertaining” as having to deal with 3+ different code and design styles in the same code base because all previous developer thought their own way of doing things was the superior way so just added one more layer of their style (not just coding but, worse, software design) on top of what was already there increasing the mess, rather than work within the existing structure and style and doing some refactoring.

      Anyway, in my experience having to read, understand and work with existing code that you yourself did not made is way more time costly and less pleasant than actually doing your stuff from scratch.

    • @GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’ve found they’re great as a learning tool where decent docs are available. Or as an interactive docs you can ask follow up questions to.

      We mostly use c# and it’s amazing at digging into the MS docs to pull out useful things from the bcl or common patterns.

      Our new juniors got up to speed so fast by asking it to explain stuff in the existing codebases. Which in turn takes pressure off more senior staff.

      I got productive in vuejs in a large codebase in a couple days that way.

      Using to generate actual code is insanely shit haha It is very similar to just copy pasting code and hacking it in without understanding it.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        176 months ago

        You make a good point about using it for documentation and learning. That’s a pretty good use case. I just wouldn’t want young developers to use it for code completion any more than I’d want college sophomores to use it for writing essays. Professors don’t have you write essays because they like reading essays. Sometimes, doing a task manually is the point of the assignment.

  • @Rob200@lemmy.autism.place
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    Wait. Ai doesn’t have logic built beyond untested data that’s thrown at it? Who could had told someone this would happen ahead of time? Conspiracy theorists.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      Why have you blanked out bits of the article?

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176 months ago

    Also it is pure junk. Chat-GPT code may come out fast on the screen but it’s garbage. I tried python and c++ both just pure garbage. Sure I got it to do what I wanted but only after a day of hair pulling repetitive madness. Simple task, open an image and invert it . Then we’ll it opened the image but didn’t invert. Or maybe it’s upside down. Can you open the image right side up and invert it…fuck fuck, why is the window full screen? Did I ask for full screen, shit heavens no! Anyway it’s a fuckin idiot just rambling code at me.