🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2093 months ago

    I never trusted Honey to begin with but this goes far deeper than I ever expected. I always wondered “yeah, but where do they get their money?” I always figured it was just a way to take people’s data and sell it to data brokers (which they probably also do, let’s be honest) but this is just blatant fraud. Stealing affiliate money from links and having companies pay them to purposefully give out worse coupon codes is just devious through and through. It’s basically free money and everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

    • Electric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 months ago

      I always assumed it was a combination of your guess and companies giving Honey special coupon codes so consumers are more eager to spend.

      “Hey Honey, we’ll give you 1% commission if you just host this HONEY5 coupon for 5% off.”

      That was my impression when I used it once. Wasn’t worth having an extension just for a slight discount. Love when a company doesn’t fulfill the service they advertise.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        But that would be an ethical business model, we can’t have that, this is PayPal and this is the internet. There’s no place for ethics in that combination.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

      Enshittification correctly defined.

    • @w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Same. I never downloaded it or anything like it but I didn’t realize they were playing both sides. It’s fucked.

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      863 months ago

      Yeah I always wondered what the catch was? The CEO was always posting on Reddit trying to defend honey and how cool they were.

      Either way, I never trust any shopping deal plugins. The whole idea of them is sketchy.

      • Electric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        243 months ago

        Only shopping plugin I use is the one that comes with Edge. Surprisingly good to track price history and find other sites selling the product. I considered some Chrome plugin that displays an Amazon product’s country of origin to avoid Chinesium but apparently it didn’t work well or something like that from reading the reviews. Had some attached rewards function for shopping with it, ick.

        • @NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 months ago

          There’s a good one for Amazon called Keepa that shows you the price history of the item. Helps a ton keeping prices in check during sales like Prime Day to see how much you are actually saving, if anything.

          Also nice to see how much you could potentially save if you just wait for the next sale or if there was already a price decrease. Often times it looks like I’m good buying without waiting for any sale as the sales only knocked off a few dollars, at most.

          • Electric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Thank you for the recommendation, looks neat. Tracking prices of different conditions is a nice touch. I’ll have to scrutinize it further when I make my next online purchases and chuck it into Edge as I made that my dedicated shopping browser.

        • @ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 months ago

          It’s funny how Edge got lambasted for it when they introduced that feature, but it’s legitimately super helpful and non-invasive.

          • Electric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            I had no idea it was, I don’t keep up with browser news. I just wish they didn’t migrate to Chromium. It became my main browser for a brief period before that.

            I just used it randomly when I was working and doing some shopping for a computer in my downtime and decided to try out the feature. That and the AI are super good when combo’ed to shop smart. Managed to save $800 off a quality laptop.

  • @scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    I guess most people don’t have much knowledge about affiliate link URLs and how easily they can be rewritten to shift where the commission goes. I implemented SkimLinks on a hunch of websites so I’ve seen it before. Forum owners used to get upset about anyone posting product links in their comments because they night include an affiliate code. SkimLinks adds JavaScript to every page that rewrites those codes to the forum owner’s personal account. It will even insert an affiliate code into basic Amazon links that don’t have one. Once this came out, forums went a lot easier on Amazon links.

    After seeing all this, the second I spot a browser extension that wants to get between me and Amazon, I immediately assume they will rewrite all the links for their own benefit. Otherwise what’s in it for them? This news isn’t much of a surprise.

    • @TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      The biggest issue that this video brings up is that businesses can filter out certain coupon codes if the discount is too high

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    873 months ago

    If you’re sitting at a poker table and you can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.

    Alternately, if you look at an online service and can’t tell what the product is, It’s you.

    • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      And even if you can tell what the product is, it‘s still often you. “Premium” subscriptions for example might hide (some) ads, but services still collect as much data about you. Even grocery stores where the offer seems obvious are trying to bait you into installing their apps to collect data on top of charging you for every item. And sure it’s not relevant in this case, but it’s something we should never forget.

      • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        I mean, yes?

        The key difference is linux wants you to help make it better. Something like Honey steals your data, and steals money from others, and then wants you to make it better.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        Except Linux has proper legal underpinnings that anyone with a few brain cells can verify.

        You can compile your own code too

        Hence why people always say do your diligence

      • Fubarberry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        233 months ago

        Yeah, I feel like that’s usually a very accurate saying, but it doesn’t really work with a lot of open source projects.

        I hate that you’re getting downvoted by so many people who don’t realize you’re pointing out an exception to the rule, and instead think you have some fundamental misunderstanding about how Linux works.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They are getting downvoted for misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services and applying it to crowd sourced non-profit open source projects.

          Truly open source projects don’t have suckers.

          • Fubarberry
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services

            To be honest I don’t think that’s clear at all, it feels like it’s more a rule about being skeptical of free stuff online. And many for profit companies have open source projects that can be used safely even though the source is a for-profit.

        • @tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s difficult for others to take advantage of you when you can learn what the software actually does and have it modified to work another way.

          Linux (for the most part) is open source but I’d argue the inclusion of any proprietary software/firmware/drivers means something ultimately isn’t.

        • @otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          I think the issue was with the original commenter’s phrasing. Facebook looks like a product. But the commenter meant “How the product is being funded”.

          Of course, it gets hard when there’s multiple sources of revenue. You used to be able to spot ads and come to the conclusion that that was everything. Now an ad is just the tip of the iceberg.

  • Jin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 months ago

    Why do I feel like mentioning the LTT was very personal?😂

    • @HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They’re one of the largest tech media companies and deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it. Then they took sponsorships from Karma, which is a competitor to Honey that does the exact same thing.

      • Jin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -253 months ago

        No, they are not one of largest tech media companies They have less than what 100 employees. Maybe you used the wrong term?

        When did they learn about it? Where your proof?

        • It’s the holidays and a lot of content of made awhile, I don’t expect them to make dedicated statement.
        • @Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          83 months ago

          First of all, Lemmy has a lot of users for whom English is a second language. So maybe don’t be a jackass about correcting grammar.

          Secondly, in case you happen to be in that group of people ‘largest media company’ in this context applies to their reach, and not to their actual size. They are ‘large’ because they have a large audience, generate a lot of revenue, and are worth a lot of money. LMG also comprises 10 different YouTube channels with maybe 10 billion views between them.

          • Jin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Look I’m not correcting grammar, I’m not native English speaker myself + I’m very dyslexic.

            But when someone says the biggest tech media companies, you put them in same category as Disney, Apple and so on, which makes them very small.

            • @tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              Sometimes people exaggerate and if you point out what they said is inaccurate then they get mad you’re not addressing their main point.

              • Jin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                People are going mad anyways, doesn’t really matter especially here on lemmy ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

                People are putting the blame on creators, instead of PayPal/honey, when creators are the victims too. We don’t know the full story from LLT from their side if “deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it

                If I’m questioning it, I’m going to get negative feedback because the narrative is they are to blame because they are “big”.

          • Jin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -93 months ago

            I watched it, but I’ll reserve my judgment until the next wan show because I don’t know if it has been mentioned before on an earlier show or how the problem has been interpret by staff.

            • @dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 months ago

              … Ok well here’s the link to the moment (in the video you watched) where we have one **staff ** member giving an official response to how LTT interpreted the problem in a forum post on their website.

              https://youtu.be/vc4yL3YTwWk?t=811

              And here’s a link to their youtube channel where they talk about honey

              https://www.youtube.com/@LinusTechTips/search?query=honey

              You’ll notice. There isn’t one.

              So for at least two years, they knew honey was stealing affiliate links and considered it a big enough problem to end their partnership, but did not consider it a big enough issue to make a video on it.

              • Jin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -43 months ago

                I dunno why you keep sending me a bunch of text and videos. I’m going to wait until the next wan show, so I can understand what really happened inside.

                • @whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  23 months ago

                  I’m down to listen to their response myself but as someone who tried really hard to explain away their last dumb controversy only to be proven wrong multiple times, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just pure negligence. Actions speak louder than words and their actions have shown they’re a flawed company like any other despite what their conversations on WAN show would have you believe.

                  Fuck Honey/PayPal first and foremost, don’t get me wrong. But unless there were legal issues around it, we also can’t ignore it if the biggest tech YouTube channel found out about one of the biggest sponsors on YouTube being a scam, stopped working with them for that reason, but said absolutely nothing to anyone else.

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        LTT says to have not known users were being mistreated at the time they dropped the sponsor, and that they didn’t discover it but were informed.

  • Electric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    353 months ago

    Pretty sure this was already posted yesterday when it came out. Or it might have been a different community.

    Watching the full video is important though because they are scamming the consumer too, not just “”“influencers”“”. Someone made a great comment about how it’s just one greedy troll stealing from another and has no effect on the consumer since they still save money but Honey not actually giving you the best coupons on purpose is next level dickholery.

    Lying about the coupons really should be the focus so people stop harming themselves using Honey.

    • @dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I used Honey before thr PayPal purchase and it did have working discount codes, as well as a cashback thing that I redeemed a couple times. But I haven’t had any codes work for a long time.

      I don’t have any love for influencers but they have the right to make money IMO, and it’s completely shitty behavior for honey to be taking that away from them.

    • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      See, I’m torn. I’ve never used honey, so I was never scammed. However I do think them scamming consumers is awful.

      Buuuuuuuut, I DO enjoy the fact that they scammed influencers.

      • Electric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        Yeah I thought that too until seeing the bits about consumers getting shafted. Awful company, hope they get sued into bankruptcy.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Small content creator makes informative, honest review of a product. Honey gets money on the commission. This makes you happy?

    • @kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      It’s also kind of a protection racket against shops. “Partner with us or we’ll cut into your profits by spreading cheap coupon codes, but partner with us and we’ll protect you”

    • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I never use affiliate links AND I don’t bother looking for coupons (let’s be honest, who does?) so I don’t give a crap, every now and then I’m saving money without taking it from anyone 🤷

      • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        I just look up price trends and that’s pretty much it for me too. Coupons rarely ever worked for me in the early days of e-commerce so I quickly stopped bothering.

      • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        idk, I find the coupon thing to be super easy. Just takes one search and maybe two clicks if you have ad blockers on. Mostly the only time is if I’m ordering something like pizza for a get together where no special applies. There’s a local chain in my state that had a coupon code for half off my order that wasn’t listed on their site (they might’ve given it to me if I called but who knows). Been using that for the past year and it allows me to convince everyone to go there instead of a national chain. I’ve also been lucky with some manufacturers coupons for products I’m ordering straight from them, it’s more rare though so it’s hit or miss sometimes.

    • nek0d3r
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Agreed. I remember enjoying their workshop videos a long time ago, but they can’t even be trusted for PC building info, much less anything else.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        163 months ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

      • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

    • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

  • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    I don’t really wanna watch a video… but how do you “steal” affiliate links or coupon codes?

    If you are doing affiliate marketing for a company and they give you a coupon code for 10% off called GET10OFF and that code gets used, the affiliate marketer gets the sale no matter where they got that code from?

    • @kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I’ve slept since I watched and am not great with tech, but iirc the link with the affiliate code when clicked takes you to the site. Then honey has a pop up that, when clicked, replaces the link with their own, swiping the commission. Hope that makes sense - most people likely would not catch it. The Linus tech tips was used as an example of even a tech channel with lots of employees taking quite a while to notice themselves, and even when they did, it wasn’t quite conclusive for some reason?

      Another thing the video touched on is that honey would claim to search for coupons but often opt to show what the partnered companies want. So, could be there’s a coupon for 50% but they only show 10%.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Ah gotcha. So what I said about coupon codes would be valid, but affiliate links are different than the coupon codes. Also crazy they hide bigger discounts.

        Edit: But I guess they could find a company offering a coupon code, then sign up themselves knowing it’s an option now, and then show that code instead.

    • @Googlyman64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      He says that when you click on an affiliate link, a cookie gets stored on your browser that lasts for 30 days, saying that the source should get the commission for your purchase. Honey has a popup in checkout, even when there are no codes, with a big “Got It” button to close the popup. Clicking the Got It button replaces the old cookie with a Honey cookie, giving the commission from your purchase to them instead of your source.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I assume it looks for affiliate links and replaces the original with it’s own affiliate ID.

    • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      If only they had some medium to post the information, perhaps a medium that that VAST MAJORITY of their viewers use.

      “But the plans were on display…”

      “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

      “That’s the display department.”

      “With a flashlight.”

      “Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

      “So had the stairs.”

      “But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

      “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

      • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Their complaint was that honey inserted their affiliate cookie even when they didn’t find a coupon code for you. I doubt they knew the full extent of the scam.

        Plus, we don’t know what was in their contract with honey. They could still be subject to a non-disparagement clause.

        • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          GN doesn’t seem to have a problem holding their sponsors accountable, putting a story together, doing their due diligence, and then letting everybody know.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      233 months ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      523 months ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • @Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        153 months ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

        • @whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Especially considering he hasn’t been shy about ranting about a lot of things from (insert latest apple thing) to “fucking eggshell”

          • @tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            non disparagement clause

            Not the level of a non-compete clause but that’s a scummy thing I hope is not legal.

            • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              It’s fairly common. As far as legal, that will depend on the jurisdiction and the mood of the judge.

        • zqps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          213 months ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

      • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

    • @poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • @sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s

        • @poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          They told everyone and nobody cared, turns out people care if a YouTube video is made framing the same thing differently. Like yeah, Honey’s practice is bad for the creator industry, but is it bad enough to bring it back to the people who took their money? No, I don’t think so.I think this is more of an example of how easy it is to get the masses angry with a YouTube video than anything. It’s good that more people are going to move away from this information harvesting app, but I really feel like the reaction and hatred is overblown and, at least for the hatred towards creators, unwarranted.

          The way I see it, people still take money from predatory gambling sites, and if any creator deserves pushback, it’s them.

      • dantheclamman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        They could have been exposed to legal liability to report on a business partner like that.

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        [Added information: LTT say they were unaware Honey was mistreating users. So they had no reason to make a video at the time they dropped Honey for mistreating them.]

        I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on

        Their viewers getting scammed by tech they promoted isn’t worth a video on their main channel? If they could legally do it I think they should have.

        Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT

        LTT have made mistakes (edit: and made choices/comments I would disprove of) but the dunking here does seem disproportionate.

        • @whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m definitely noticing a lot of hate warranted or not bjt it’s honestly also been hard to defend them after their last “scandal”. Once bitten twice shy…

          Same reason I don’t try to give CD Projekt RED the benefit of the doubt anymore even though I loved Cyberpunk despite the messed up launch, and it seems they’ve largely redeemed themselves - I now realize where their priorities lie.

    • @tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      That doesn’t include users being a victim? Honey gives users worse coupons when better ones are available, apparently that happens if companies do a deal with Honey.