• @DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Didn’t a year ago or so, Some European lawmaker made a vague hint in support of something that involved regulations on social media, and Elon replied “go fuck yourself” verbatem?

    Play hardball, or surrender and give them what they want. there’s no compromise or middle ground with these techbro fascists

  • @timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    60
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Fine the heck out of them then. If they don’t pay the fine ban em. Plenty of alternatives out there. More competition in the search engine market would be better anyways.

    Not too big of a fan of banning companies as the hurdles should be decently high… Especially if many people rely on their service but if they won’t comply with our jurisdiction long term I see this as the only option as fees can not be order of business to pay

    • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Start criminal proceedings to imprison the leadership responsible for non-compliance. Seize their assets to pay for any fine.

      Why do we accept that all solutions to corporate crimes should be fines and kiddie gloves?

  • @Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    205 days ago

    We need fact checkers more than community notes. Because disproving a claim takes a lot of time and skill, and notes will be abused for financial and personal gain in the long run. Perhaps it is also better to use the word content moderator instead of fact checker, as finding the ultimate truth isn’t possible, unless you just present a mathematical proof.

  • @MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1025 days ago

    Damn.

    Wish the rest of us could just ignore all laws & not face any consequences.

    What a fucking joke this entire system is.

    • @OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      304 days ago

      They don’t have a problem giving someone 100 years for a quarter bag of weed though. For a first time offense.

      • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        Oh that was long ago. it’s for not having a baby if you’re female now. Megacorps run usa and now the worst (which is best for some reason) ceo in the history of man will again be president and continue the clear path to government dismantling

  • @cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -44
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Google has behind it an incoming US government that puts US economic interests first, and relishes bullying its allies. The EU is weak, divided, and geostrategically boxed in. It will bend the knee.

    • @Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 days ago

      Yeah… In fourth grade I was taught that there is nothing like an outer foe to create inner peace. I never imagined it to be the US to accomplish that, but here we are.

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 days ago

      The EU and its allies is bigger than Trump’s rogue oligarchy

      • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -305 days ago

        I gotta say that seemed pretty performative considering apple was obviously already moving that way with usb-c on all their devices.

          • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -75 days ago

            :) I’m glad the EU did it. Having usb c for all of my devices is awesome.

            But they waited so long to do it. I think everything except the iPhone was already usb c (iirc) and given the supply chain lead times, the timing of the reg vs the release of the new usb c phone, I really think they had the usb-c phones in flight for a couple years.

            Maybe the looming threat of the reg made it happen. Maybe it made it happen faster. But it seemed like the direction they were headed.

            At the end of the day, I’m glad they regulate vs what the US does. Even if their regs aren’t perfect / late, they do something for their constituents.

            • @barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              105 days ago

              The only reason the regulation happened is because Apple ignored the “industry, agree on a standard or we’ll set one for you” memo: By the time the EU passed the act all other manufacturers had already shaped up.

              That is: For other companies, the looming threat sufficed. Apple needed to be forced.

        • Pika
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Apple cried and moaned about that and the battery repair regulation that was placed. They may have been planning to eventually switch but it definitly wasn’t a soon endeavor until forced by the regulation.

          They even posted multiple excuses of why they didn’t agree with the decision because they felt the problem that the EU was trying to fix had been resolved since newer charging blocks had USB-C as the input so users could just swap the cable and use the same brick.

          Being said, with big tech companies I think regulation is the only way, which means sadly will likely never happen in the US

  • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 days ago

    God I hope this happens, it will be absolutely hilarious when the gcp services on which the EU infraestructure for telecommunications, research and development, industry, transportation, banking, agriculture, logistics and health is built up, crashes burning to the ground.

  • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 days ago

    Google is basically saying the EU couldn’t do its own subpar search and they’re not brave enough to try.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 days ago

    And not a single bit of this would matter at all if YOU PEOPLE* would just know a damned thing!

    *present company excepted, of course.

  • @PeroBasta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 days ago

    I wonder how it will work and how can be enforced. Weekly I can easily find non fact checked article on “respectable” newspaper.

    If its the newspaper themselves that prioritize click baiting over fact checking, I don’t know how can we ask Google or meta to fact check their userbase

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    153 days ago

    Google, this is t he EU, not America, they’re not going to suck up to you.

  • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    724 days ago

    Google has told the EU that it will not comply with a forthcoming fact-checking law.

    Perfect time to implement sky-high fines for non-compliance.

    • @ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      304 days ago

      Ah, but that’s why US Big Tech is splooshing cash all over President Felon and hoping he saves them from evil communist European consumer protections.

      • @CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 days ago

        Yep, they’re hoping Trump will pressure the EU to get rid of their pesky consumer protections. They don’t even make any profits for billionaires!

          • @j4yt33@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 days ago

            I mean Putin’s weaselly little far right lackeys are scarily close to being in government in a few European countries now (or already are, Hungary and Slovakia). So who knows

            • @futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 days ago

              The good news is that, when Putin goes, they’ll go too. There are some other dependancies that you can easily work out.

    • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 days ago

      I’m OK with this risk. The incredible rise of stupid arguments that we attempt to treat as equal for consideration is unreasonable. If we want to continue having meaningful discourse, we have to remove disinformation.

      • @Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, but the question was; who decides what is disinformation? If it was some truly competent and unbiased AI system then I perhaps wouldn’t be as concerned about it, though I can see issues with that too, but humans are flawed and I see this as a potenttial slippery slope towards tyranny and censorship.

        • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Imperfect need not be the enemy of good. Failure to combat disinformation is absolutely a path to tyranny, and a lie going halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on is effectively censorship if the truth comes out only by the time the public has lost interest.

          Yes, there are problems combating it, but we have to show up to the fight somehow. I’ll take a fallible fact checking system over none at all, because the court of public opinion makes a poor fact checker.

      • @Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -95 days ago

        At times like early covid there wasn’t much facts and evidence available. Back then masks didn’t stop the spread of the virus but vaccines were supposed to. Who decides what the facts are in times like that?

        • @BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 days ago

          You rely on what you know and check if the assumptions are still correct when you have more information at hand. That’s what government agencies are supposed to be for.

    • @tree_frog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Assuming you’re asking in good faith, the code is here.

      https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation

      Paid fact-checkers spread across all member states.

      “The new Code will extend fact-checking coverage across all EU Member States and languages and ensure that platforms will make a more consistent use of fact-checking on their services. Moreover, the Code works towards ensuring fair financial contributions for fact-checkers’ work and better access to fact-checkers to information facilitating their daily work.”

      Essentially, everything will have Snopes attached to it. Including political ads and other forms of advertising. As well as more blatant propaganda.

  • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    225 days ago

    If the links in the article are accurate, this doesn’t seem to be a “law”, but this thing: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation

    Anyone know more about it than I could quickly find? Is this in any way legally enforceable?

    Obviously, I believe that governments have no legitimate business whatsoever telling us on the Internet what we can talk about, say to each other, etc.; but I would still like to know more about this particular attempt by the EU to do so anyway, so would appreciate more information.

    • @tree_frog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 days ago

      It’s set to become mandatory, i.e. law. According to the article.

      And this isn’t a free speech issue. It’s about disinformation. Folks can say what they want, but a political ad needs to clearly be a political ad. And disinformation can’t be profit motivated.

      It’s all in the article you just linked. You can say what ever you want, but if it’s bullshit, Google will need to flag it or face fines.

      • @Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It isn’t law yet though, and it is the current iteration that Google won’t follow. We have yet to see how they will react if it actually becomes law. My guess is that they will, begrudgingly, bend the knee.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The DSA contains provisions for combatting disinformation and as a very large online platform google is required to implement suitable practices. The DSA is a regulation, that is, immediately applicable law in all of the EU. As is usual for laws it’s written pretty generically and abstract, though, so the commission is also publishing more detailed documents that companies can use as check-lists.

      In essence, the difference between the tax code and the finance ministry publishing a paper on accounting best practices. You’re free to ignore the latter but that will likely make your life harder than it needs to be.