• sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    6017 days ago

    Lol… You gonna browse how daddy told you or you won’t get to browse

  • Jerry on PieFed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1217 days ago

    I just duplicated this. I downloaded Pale Moon and went to https://hear-me.social and clicked on “Register”. It puts up a Cloudflare “managed challenge” which loops endlessly when using Pale Moon, but not the other browsers I’ve tried it with, including Zen, another Firefox fork.

    It’s a problem, for sure.

    • Maki
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1217 days ago

      As a staunch Pale Moon user, Cloudflare is just being a bully and I circumvent their nonsense when I need to desperately use a particular site or just don’t go to that site anymore if I can do without.

      • SerotoninSwells
        link
        fedilink
        English
        616 days ago

        Greed. I honestly don’t know if they’re even aware of the problem. Most corporations have cut teams to the bone and I can’t see Cloudflare being an exception. The janitor is probably writing detection rules now.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Agree for static content like news and blogs. Disagree for dynamic content like games and social media. And the latter is mostly for scale (having server-side templating is expensive for rapidly changing content).

      Then again, there’s a case for snapshotting SM pages every so often for things like crawlers and cli browsers.

  • @bigredcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5816 days ago

    It is obvious that Cloudflare is being influenced to enforce browser monopolies. Imagine if Cloudflare existed in 2003 and stopped non Internet Explorer browsers. If you use cloudflare to “protect” your site you are discriminating against browser choice and are as bad as Microsoft in 1998.

    • @admin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      716 days ago

      If you use cloudflare to “protect” your site you are discriminating against browser choice and are as bad as Microsoft in 1998.

      😕

  • 2xsaiko
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9817 days ago

    These bastards haven’t MITMed half the internet for nothing. This isn’t the first time they abuse that either.

    I hate that I once fell for it too when I just started out hosting stuff and put it behind their proxy.

      • @pogodem0n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4917 days ago

        “Man in the middle”. They are used by a lot of web services as a proxy, usually to prevent DDOS attacks.

        • mox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2516 days ago

          And when Cloudflare is the proxy for a web site, it’s Cloudflare that provides the HTTPS connection, meaning that you don’t actually have an encrypted channel directly to the site. Cloudflare is the man-in-the-middle eavesdropping on all of your communications with that site. Your bank transactions, your medical records, your personal messages, etc.

          • @commander@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            116 days ago

            Interesting. I’m going to keep this in mind.

            Weird how much of a monopoly cloudflare has on the internet. I guess it’s going to start being an indicator for me for services that have becomes “too big for their britches.”

            • @mac@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              216 days ago

              Small companies use CF as well. It really is one of the best ways to prevent all sorts of bad actors

              • mox
                link
                fedilink
                English
                216 days ago

                One of the easiest, perhaps. Not best. Anything that gives a single entity control over so much of the internet, and positions them to snoop on so much of everyone’s communications, will never be “best”.

            • mox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              516 days ago

              Have you ever tried to visit a web site and found a Cloudflare error page instead? It might have looked like this:

              https://www.webproeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/error-524-cloudflare-233e5a08ce8c4d92843b7a841fa7c015.png

              Do you know how they’re able to insert that error page into the response that reaches your browser, even though it’s an https connection and your browser assures you that it’s “secure”?

              Clouldflare is able to do this because they are a middle-man between you and the site. They can eavesdrop and/or alter anything sent or received on that connection.

              • @msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                115 days ago

                I thought that was for their hosted websites, had no idea whether they even do hosting/cloud infra.

                But yes, I hate them to my core.

  • @Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4917 days ago

    I would be very interested to know how they plan to resolve these issues with “Ladybird.” Using a new engine will likely clash with the FALSE “security measures” of many websites and harm the browsing experience. It’s often said that users should demand respect for web standards, but in the meantime, as usability declines, users will gradually drift away. Firefox learned this lesson the hard way.

    • @AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      817 days ago

      Servo is another wip web browser, managed by the Linux foundation’s European branch. It’s a little less far along but is making relatively quick progress now. Apparently discord already mostly works, with sending messages currently being a problem.

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 days ago

      Another comment suggested that helped with LibreWolf, but that is a closer fork than Pale Moon, so not sure

  • Limerance
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 days ago

    How can I test, if I get blocked? I just started using Waterfox and so far no issues.

  • @wordcraeft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1316 days ago

    I was planning on moving away from Cloudflare to European providers anyway, so this just adds fuel to the fire.

    I’m considering using BunnyDNS for DNS management, not using a CDN at all, and using Scaleway for serverless functions.

    • @admin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 days ago

      Maybe is against the ToS but I’ve used github as CDN for free in the past… Might work for you.

      I never felt it was wrong, it was around the time of the Microsoft acquisition.

      • @wordcraeft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        215 days ago

        I appreciate the suggestion, but Github is also an American company. I’ve been moving my git repositories to Codeberg.

        My sites don’t get enough traffic to warrant a CDN really, but if necessary, BunnyCDN looks like it can fit the bill. Plus, my static sites are in Scaleway object storage.

      • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Yeah and that’s why it’s one of the basics of the basics you learn as a software developer that you shouldn’t sniff the useragent, because it’s unreliable and causes issues. Yet all big webpages (especially those pretending to be a software) do it, causing issues. Even just trimming the useragent string (xorigin.trimming.policy) makes “advanced services” like a webshop unusable.

        Just don’t do useragent sniffing, do feature detection instead.

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      That’s analogous to saying you won’t call any numbers on certain carrier

      It’s possible, but your overall service is devalued if you can’t connect to a large group of people.

    • @ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1617 days ago

      Then you won’t browse about 20% of the Internet, which doesn’t sound like a lot but it’s disproportionately impacting sites you would generally want to browse

      I posted to this effect in a Firefox alternatives thread: if you use an alternative low adoption rate FOSS browser you trade increased privacy via less/no data harvesting for decreased privacy via much higher susceptibility to browser fingerprinting by google/meta/etc. doesn’t matter if you resize your windows if your browser reports its one that only 5,000 people use. And something tells me the tech giants have a way around user agent spoofing

      And now even if you don’t care about that? Fuck you. Cloudflare locks you out of the modern internet because of course anyone not using chrome or safari is a bot

      I have pretty draconian privacy protections on my devices and home network. It makes the internet hostile. Captchas regularly fail and I have to try them many times. Embedded youtube videos always think I am a bot and refuse to play unless I sign in, I get weird interstitial pages with captchas on google search, yandex, etc (kagi and searx don’t so I use searx), etc.

      Advertisers have pushed companies to make the internet openly hostile to anyone who wants to maintain privacy. And to be clear google and meta are advertisers first and foremost. Fuck them

      • @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 days ago

        I have given up hiding from the tracking. Instead flood them with a torrent of bullshit data. AdNauseam, click on all the adverts. If the internet is going to be hostile then I shall be actively malicious to it in response.

        • @Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1117 days ago

          That’s good in theory, but a site behind Cloudflare won’t necessarily notice that a legitimate user got blocked. If you want them to care, you’ll have to find a way to contact them. For more impact, tell them which competitor you spent money with instead.

        • @Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          216 days ago

          I mean the criticism against Cloudflare is 100% valid. Having a single service be the single point of failure for half the web, not to mention that they can read the contents of every single request they proxy, is a terrible joke.

          But the service they provide is real. A small business/service just doesn’t have the capabilities to handle a DDoS attack. And every minute their site is down means lost customers/users.