New Frequently Asked Questions list in Settings > System > About hidden in builds 26120.3576 and 22635.5090. Has some questions related to the Windows version and device specs. (vivetool /enable /id:55305888).
Brings back memories!
Didn’t it also max out at something ridiculous like 8.6? To “keep room for better hardware in the future”?
it maxed out at 5.9 at first, then it was raised to 7.9 for Win7 and 9.9 for the rest. TIL it’s still a thing, I thought it started and ended with Vista: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_System_Assessment_Tool
5.1 Calculations per second? Seems low.
Simpler times, when 0.0000000051 GHz was enough to get by!
Its running Windows. Once the corporations have taken their cut, there are 5.1 calculations left for the user.
Depends on what is calculated. Calculating all digits of pi 5.1 times per second seeems pretty fast.
The answer is always going to be, “Because you’re running the incredibly bloated Windows operating system.”
Just install UBUNTU, it will make your 10 year old machine run like it’s brand new because the OS doesn’t suck and isn’t Windows 98 with code piled on top of it.
That’s unfair. It’s Windows NT with code piled on top. Also, Linux Mint may be an easier transition for Windows users.
Ugh I hate this. It could be a list but they’ve got AI or somebody that writes like AI expand each bullet into a useless paragraph.
Just download more RAM. I don’t see what the big deal is? /s
Unlock more RAM with a monthly subscription, starting at 10 €/month for every GB we disabled for you!
Oh you mean like Windows 7 did
Wasn’it even introduced in Vista?
Now that you mention it, yes. I’d forgotten because I barely used Vista. I ran it as a dual boot with XP and wound up staying on XP most of the time. Didn’t really switch over till 7.
Seems like a way to push hardware sales
MS doesn’t really sell much hardware though…
Ms will be paid handsomely by intel and nvidia to push their hardware and ignore competition. Kinda like intel has always done make their cpus seem and benchmark better.
What are you talking about? Most people buy from major manufacturers, so another hardware sale means another Windows sale.
Pretty narrow vision. Microsoft can suggest hardware for you and charge the seller for the advert.
Wow your chrome is running really slow, try buying new Corsair ddr5 ram available now on amazon
Can. Are they?
Just discussing potential.
They sell bogus certification for others hardware though.They used to, not relevant today. Sorry.
Do they? This is the first I’m hearing about this.
Looks like my info is pretty out of date, they stopped charging a long time ago.
Image a world where the OS got faster and wasn’t the focus of the computer.
Too bad nobody makes a FOSS OS where the incentive is better performance and compatibility instead of forcing people to repurchase.
This existed briefly, but was quickly removed because big box retailers complained that people were looking at the real stats instead of big numbers in their ads.
That’s an easy answer. It’s because it’s running Windows 11. Install Linux on it and it won’t suck anymore.
Windows 11 won’t let me know anything. Ever since I was able to get Final Fantasy XIV to run on my Debian laptop, I have not had Windows on any of my computers.
Ever since i was able to play system shock one for the first time and monhun world stopped bsoding on my fedora, i won’t experience this feature either.
bsoding
If you’re getting BSOD on Linux, you run goofed somewhere.
I was just wondering why tripple-a games don’t tell you that in the graphics options. Gave cyberpunk another chance with a newer pc and it was hard to dial in the right settings. It’s weird to me that they put a lot of effort into the games itself but don’t care how it will be experienced. Stating bottlenecks and recommendations for demanding settings would go along way i think.
Don’t most games list their recommended and minimum system requirements? Wouldn’t also Task Manager or something similar suggest what the bottleneck is?
Yeah but “recommend” could mean anything? Is that 60fps at full ultra or 30 at high? It’s often quite a bit of trial and error to dial in a good compromise on lower spec pcs
What games should do is tell you the impact that settings have on performance. Just a text blurb that mentions how significantly you can expect a setting to matter. I’ve seen it in a few games where some settings are marked with something like heavy performance penalty but it would be nice for more things to be labeled.
Looking at something like the task manager will tell you your CPU or GPU is maxed out, but how do you know what to change to correct this? Can you just change a few barely-noticeable settings, or are you expected to replace your CPU? If the recommended is CPU X, then why is my CPU Y maxed out? If I exceed the recommended build, why is my performance so bad?
Often the recommended build is not enough to max out graphics at reasonable framerates, for example.
It’s incredibly hard to properly assess your PC’s capabilities just from some hardware specs. You need an actual benchmark for that, which takes time and usually slows the machine to a crawl
Imagine your car does this too: “Beep Bop. Too slow. Car needs a new engine and tire.”
Not really even accurate though. It’s more like “buy a new car”.
It would be really nice if upgrading the engine was something the average person could just do. That’s feasible on EVs, but I’m guessing manufacturers and regulators block it.
No, you can do it.
Can I take a Tesla Model 3 or Chevy Bolt and throw on a second motor? Can I add some additional battery capacity in the back?
In theory, yes, of course. It won’t bolt right in, obviously.
I wonder if it’ll handle e-cores better than Task Manager.
Overall, it’s reporting 20% CPU usage. But all P-cores are pinned at 100%. E-cores idle. Of course I’m not CPU bound, I don’t need a better laptop, don’t be silly! And that’s just a Teams call. Fuck teams.
FEED ME, SEYMORE!
