The article’s title covers everything. Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

  • @_number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    the collapse of big tech is going to be an interesting watch. seems like every day they’re getting more callous, greedy, overstepping any reasonable bounds…

  • @king_tronzington@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    I agree that the “new” slack(disabling the cross channel thread sidebar) is a big deprecation in functionality. But calling it the “New Facebook” is hilariously absurd

  • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    No it isn’t.

    EDIT:

    OK to explaind on this just a bit. Slack is a Searchable Log of All Conversation and Knowledge. That’s all it is. If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

    Personally, slack has saved me a countless amount of time at work. Having a technical problem? Search slack, someone probably asked about it and there’s a solution for that. If there’s no answer, asking in the right channel will usually get it answered pretty quickly.

    Especially as a remote company, slack or a tool like it is pretty indispensable for working with my team. And yes, we talk a lot of shit on there and those conversations happen in shit talking channels which means they don’t clutter the productive channels but I can still bond with my team a bit.

    I guess like any tool, it’s about how you use it. In this case though I don’t think you can blame the tool even though slack is definitely not perfect. It’s definitely far from Facebook, I honestly think you’d win some kind of record with that stretch.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I would never talk shit about anything at work on a medium that keeps a permanent record. Do people really have that hard a time staying professional?

      • @shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Of course it’s not wise to talk shit on a company platform, but Slack is hardcore about privacy.

        I’m our Slack admin. I cannot see a DM I wasn’t invited to. I cannot even see private channel names that I’m not invited to.

        The only way Slack will divulge private posts, or posts in private channels, is if the account owner contacts support and makes a case for why they need to see anything private.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          The danger in my mind isn’t someone without access, it’s someone with access taking screenshots and using them against you. That’s why I don’t say anything remotely shitty unless it’s on unrecorded audio.

    • @dbilitated@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

      perfect. yeah I love slack. people can post their FB shit in #random but the team chat is a great way to get and find answers.

    • @jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I’ve worked at companies where we had great communication policies around slack. Slack rooms were for the room topic, not for conversations.

      There was an off topic room where people could be social and shit talk.

      But basically due to our moderation rules, we really encourage people to keep channels on topic. Which made it more useful, less noisy. So it’s a social network and so far is social people use it. But the structure on top of it is determined by the company policy and the culture

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        You’re really stretching the meaning of “social network” there. May as well say the postal system is a social network.

        • @jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          its used by people socially, so yes, i think the post office counts as a social network… literally

        • RaivoKulli
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Newspapers had those things where you could chat by sending in mail and having a nickname and shit.

  • @A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    2023 SEPTEMBER 14 TECHNOLOGY
    Slack Is Basically Facebook Now

    Slack’s redesign suggests that keeping up with Slack is the only work worth doing.

    By Ian Bogost

    image...

    Illustration of an office worker with an emoji-selection interface covering his head Illustration by Jared Bartman / The Atlantic. Source: Getty.

    “Oh,” I slacked my Atlantic colleagues earlier this week, beneath a screenshot of a pop-up note that Slack, the group-chat software we use, had presented to me moments earlier. “A fresh, more focused Slack,” it promised, or threatened. On my screen, the program’s interface was suddenly a Grimace-purple color. I sensed doom in this software update.

    Slowly, over the days that followed, complaints about the new Slack started trickling into our chats. “folks I cannot handle this new version of slack and will be taking the rest of the month off,” one Atlantic staffer said. “I am reverting to sending physical memos on personal letterhead,” posted another. “all my slacks are: I hate the new slack,” slacked Adrienne LaFrance, the magazine’s executive editor. (Later on, she messaged me separately to see if I would write about Slack’s terrible new format.)

    Ian Bogost is a contributing writer at The Atlantic.

  • ripcord
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    If you say so. We use it for work really heavily and it’s 99% productive.

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

      JFC, I have not seen such a worse take in many years. The Slack redesign was annoying and I wished Slack would stop making the UI worse each update, but it’s still the lifeblood of our communication chain.

      • Clarke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        My team communicates through gifs and emoji only

        • 6daemonbag
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          As long as they speak the language I don’t foresee a los on productivity

  • Veraxus
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    This is the stupidest thing I’ve read in weeks. And to be clear, I have read a lot of monumentally stupid nonsense in the last few weeks.

    I’d say more, but @Aurenkin nailed it, so I will defer to their comment.

  • Eager Eagle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    None of that is new to Slack. They could’ve written an article to make a decent critique of the questionable UI changes Slack introduced, but instead they targeted features that were already there for years, like reactions and huddle.

    The new interface just wastes space and hides the notification count of unfocused workspaces. I just wish Slack would start making interface changes like these optional.

  • @MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Every app just copies other apps until they don’t do the thing they were originally “for”.

    & then what’s left is an app that does “everything” very poorly.

    & this is our whole reality now.

    How do we escape?