cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/5340114

ghostarchive
Original Discussion[1]

San Francisco police told Polygon that officers responded to Unity’s San Francisco office “regarding a threats incident.” A “reporting party” told police that “an employee made a threat towards his employer using social media.” The employee that made the threat works in an office outside of California, according to the police statement.

  1. https://lemmy.world/post/5057297 ↩︎

  • @demonquark@lemmy.mlEnglish
    -13•2 years ago

    I don’t know who needs to hear this:
    Unity sucks, but death threats are not okay.

    If you really want to stop shit like this, vote in progressive legislators. So we can codify the fact that corporate actions influence more ppl than just the shareholders and their actions should reflect that.

    Edit: thanks everyone for correcting me. I meant not okay.

    • rynzcycle
      21•2 years ago

      but death threats are okay.

      Freudian slip or really passionate about video games?

      • @Intralexical@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1•2 years ago

        Maybe they’re just a fan of death?

        …Or maybe they mean threatening death itself— As in, like “Stop killing my friends, Death, that’s really not cool, and I’m going to start stealing your Death-beers from your Death-fridge if you don’t stop”.

    • @settoloki@lemmy.oneEnglish
      3•2 years ago

      You’re gonna die!

      But before that, let’s go see this unity, I hear she’s handing out good times.

    • Chozo
      19•2 years ago

      You might wanna double check that one, chief.

    • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7•2 years ago

      Answering more to the spirit of the comment, just voting is not really cutting it. Even when progressives are voted in, most of them are too hesitant to defy corporate interests.

      Of course, death threats for if a game is not as good as someone wanted is just ridiculous, and generalized death threats involving people who have nothing to do with the decision is a psycho attitude. But this? A disgruntled worker worried about their livelihood, directing it to the people in charge? People who casually find fit to destroy countless careers to get a little bit more money? I find it hard to blame them.