• @multiplewolves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1926 days ago

    I was curious why someone downvoted you, so I took a look at the video.

    That is absolutely 100% CGI and I’m not sure why anyone is doubting that. I’m on mobile and I can still see it.

    Take my upvote.

    • @FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      326 days ago

      The biggest tell is at 0:21.

      You see the badge flying around as a physics object and then, when the animation stops the left side part of the necklace “resets” and slides up on the bots neck despite that being like a ball suddenly deciding to go from a rest to rolling up hill.

      It looks like it went from being rendered as a physics object to slowing down enough that it returned to being a regular object attached to the model’s rigging .

      • @multiplewolves@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        The badge, the soft landings, and the seams in the concrete blipping in and out were the biggest factors for me.

        Edit for downvoter: Watch nothing but the concrete for the whole video. I think the badge moved too perfectly and the landings didn’t seem to reflect physics, but the jitter on the concrete rendering is beyond unrealistic.

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        I don’t see the movement with the badge you’re describing, can you screenshot it for me? It looks normal to my untrained eye and I’d like to get better at spotting fakes

        edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C-LU0cnqB8

        starting to think this is real, crazy