• ares35
      link
      fedilink
      1221 year ago

      In a follow-up post a day after his initial Tweet, Johnie noted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool,” with regard to Apple iMessage data use. Other LG smart washing machine users showed device data use from their router UIs. It turns out that these appliances more typically use less than 1MB per day.

      the writer knew that the stats were bunk, yet wrote the article anyway. the site knew this, too, tacked-on the clickbait headline and published it. toms really has gone to shit the last few years–at least under the current ownership (last changed hands 2018).

      • @br3d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        Speaking of which, it uses the same web interface as a lot of other news sites. Newsletter popup, autoplay video part-way down that then jumps to the top of the screen, etc. What Hifi is the same, and there are various other sites all with the same annoying engine. Two questions: (1) are all these sites owned by the same company and (2) is there a browser extension that can fix them?

        • ares35
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          yes, it’s the same ownership (scroll down to the bottom). they have dozens of sites. don’t know of any specific addons to help with them, though. custom ublock origin rules, perhaps.

        • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          This is happening with streaming apps too. Max and Prime look exactly the same. Either some UI engineer got hella contracts, a parent company tried to save on development, or both. Either way, theres something unnerving about your apps looking the same and just hosting different content.

      • Null User Object
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        And OP presumably read the article, knew there was no actual story, and posted it here anyway.

      • @EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        and here we are 17 hours later with it as one of the top stories on this site.

        We are soooooooo reddit 2.0.

  • @corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    It really irritates me when IoT devices force you to use “the cloud” for access. My home automation consists of roughly 100 devices. The vast majority are Zigbee, but a few use wifi. With the exception of my irrigation controller, all the wifi devices are blocked at the firewall from accessing the internet. The fact that I have to send a command half way across the country to a remote server only so it can send it right back to my home network when I want to change the watering schedule for my plants is ridiculous. Sure, I could buy a different controller, but I already spent $300 once. I’m not doing it again.

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        If it has an API that can be used locally, then sure. That’s the whole point of Zigbee, is that it’s an open standard that any IoT devices can connect to and use. So you can send local commands to any local Zigbee device, as long as they have an API that allows for it.

        • @Cihta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Open standard… hah… like bacnet was supposed to be? More and more i deal with bacnet devices that make some data unreadable (proprietary) so what was the point?

          Agree with other posts about sending data to the cloud to work. Also I’m certainly way behind on my washing machine tech because I can’t fathom a reason they should be online. So I can get an alert when the cycle is done? Ok fine… stupid but fine - as long as it stays local.

  • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Bought “smart” LG fridge, range and dishwasher a couple of years ago and never connected any of them, they function like they are supposed to, refrigerate, heat food and clean dirty dishes. No need to connect.

    Fridge manual explained something like “in case of peak energy consumption your smart energy company can send a signal to your fridge to not use power”. What the heck do I need that for? To find spoiled food and mold growing in the fridge later on?

    Why does one need to connect a range to WiFi?

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some people have hourly electric pricing, in their case it’s worth scheduling stuff based on predicted pricing. How that should work is that you’d have a home server which controls your IoT stuff (so the gadgets themselves can be firewalled from the internet and controlled only by you) and then your server would fetch pricing data and pause stuff that doesn’t need to run when prices are high and run stuff like washing when it’s cheap

      • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        TIL - cool, makes sense.

        It would make sense if we had a server that could fetch prices instead of opening up potential weak systems to the internet.

    • @Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Because now manufacturers are tying the last year of their warranty to having the devices connected to their stupid information harvesting apps.

      • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Ugh! Now that you say that we are probably not far away from WiFi enabled ranges being a feature… that WHEN enabled will allow you to:

        • Cook uninterrupted or at any time of that day
        • Get discounted prices on gas
        • Get discounts on home/renters insurance
        • Receive discounts on range/oven cleaners
        • Enable the back burners
        • Enable broiling capability
        • Allow in oven light to be turned on and off
        • Claim warranties (as you suggested)
        • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It’s an oven with a stove on top. Google “cooking range”.

          I’ve never called it that, but that’s the name for it.

    • @pastaq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Turning your fridge off for an hour will not cause your food to spoil. You probably won’t even notice a difference since they are well insulated. Turning off the compressor during the hour where most of everyone gets home and turns on their AC can have a noticeable effect on grid stability if done widely enough. I do this with a smart switch connected to my HA server instead of using cloud based connections, but the effect is the same and I’ve never had my food spoil because of it.

    • @books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      As a guy with some tendencies to worry if I turned my stove off Everytime I leave the house, this feature seems right up my list of needs

      • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Thanks for that pov! I had not considered it and to my surprise I just thought of someone in my family that has the same type of worry you do, and that person would probably benefit from that kind of peace of mind like you suggested.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    The issue with web IpT is that devices send data reports of their status every fraction of a second. The packet may just be a few bytes but over time it adds up. Instead I wished they could just send status when they change state and wait for a confirmation but that’s harder to code…

    • OADINC
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      If (Status != Prev_Status) {Send_All_User_Data();}

      • LazaroFilm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Yes! The issue is that if the server misses that packet, the status is now wrong. So they need an aknowledgement send from the server.

            • @ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Every single one that uses an interface like that does. All of them. i’m talking about the requiring a response from the server part.

              Most also do not do .1s update rate or whatever you think the one device you have does.

    • @HelloHotel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A washimg machine isnt a micro frontend, the machine should do all the calculations on cpu and not report every time the drum spins or whatever.

    • @ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      I’d connect it to wifi maybe. I wouldn’t connect it to the Internet.

      When it comes to home automation I’m generally onboard, but it’s local control or nothing.

      • @Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s a good strategy. You can do a lot of smart home automation with two separate networks, where one has Internet access and the other doesn’t.

        Here’s a reminder, keep your old routers, having an extra can really come in handy.

    • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dunno about you, but I would love to get a notification on my watch when the machine has finished it’s cycle. The stupid high pinched repeated beeping noise sucks… especially when it’s the next door neighbour’s washing machine and they’re not even home, so it goes on and on for fucking hours. And I’d like to see proper error descriptions on my phone, instead of just “UE” on the timer LCD. WTF is a “UE” error?

      If we’re going to get really fancy… I’d love to be able to load the machine in the morning, but tell it to actually start running several hours later while I’m at work. I obviously don’t want clean wet clothes going mouldy in the washing machine all day… but I don’t really want to run the washing machine when I’m home either, because it’s noisy.

      Remote activation would also be better for the environment and also better for my clothes - I’d use the the slow gentle economy cycle every time if I could remotely trigger it at 3pm on a weekday. I’m definitely not going to use that on the evenings (when I’ll be asleep in 3 hours) or on weekends (when I don’t know if I’ll be home in 3 hours time).

      A wifi connected washing machine sounds like a great feature to me, and I’d happily pay for it (with dollars, not with an invasion of privacy). I guess that means I won’t be buying an LG.

      • @5gruel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        I don’t know. My washing machine beeps three times in increasing intervals, so it isn’t that intrusive. The display shows me unique error codes that I can look up when someone happens. And I can set the machine to finish in a set amount of hours, so it will start just in time to be done when I’m back. All without WiFi

        • @ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Mine is in part of the house that I’m very likely to hear it when in most.of the rest of the house.

          But I agree in general, and I wouldn’t use it. And I have way more home automation stuff set up (and a dedicated non-infernet-connected network for it) than most people.

      • @TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I do something very similar with my connected dishwasher and Home Assistant. It’s way over-engineered due various limitations/odd design choices with the API and the machine itself), but I’ve got it setup to store the selected program when I press a button on a Hue Tap switch, and then it turns on and runs that program when our off-peak energy rate kicks in - which is better than working out how much to set on the delay timer each evening to start it in the right ballpark.

        Of course I’ve also got it setup to announce the selected program, and that the machine is “armed” via Google Home when the button is pressed, and again each time the door is opened/closed to add new dishes. And it sends notifications to my phone when the program starts (mostly for debugging purposes) and ends.

        Like I said, massively over-engineered but it was a fun little project.

        I don’t have a smart washing machine (yet) but I do have it plugged into a smart plug with an energy monitor. When the power usage drops to near zero for more than 2 minutes it sends a notification to tell me that the cycle is done.

      • @CucumberFetish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        How old is your washing machine? All of the washing machines that I have had over the last 15 years have had unique error codes, a button combination to turn off the buzzer and a delayed end functionality. Just set the program, click on the clock icon and set the program end time.

      • @dasJot@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        My home assistant tracks the power usage of my washing machine (via a Tasmota plug) and notifies me when the power goes under a threshold for a few minutes. Which happens at the end of the washing cycle.

    • mechoman444
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      As an appliance repair man if 20 years don’t ever connect your application to the wifi.

      Knowing what part of the cycle your washing machine is in at all times is useless information.

      • @FidiFadi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Exactly. Everyone has a device that can tell them when the machine is done. It is the programmable alarm in everyone’s mobile phone.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Anybody in his right minds wouldn’t connect buy a washing machine to with WiFi in the first place.

      Ftfy

      Said this elsewhere recently, family had a washing machine for 30 years, from when I was little to in my 30’s. Just fixed as needed. Could’ve still fixed it when they replaced it, just felt it was time.

      I’ve never had dirty clothes come out of a washing machine, using cold water and powder soap. Not sure why people think an agitator needs all this nonsense attached.

      I still buy my machines used off Craigslist. Current one (apartment style) is 20 years old, I’ve had it for 5 if them. Cost me less than $200. Replaced a spring for $20 so far.

      There are no IoT/smart devices in my house (well, damn TV, but I’m workin on that).

      • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Only company that makes dumb TVs anymore is Scepter, but those TV are a dice roll cause in the same model 1 tv can have a great screen and 1 can have a horrible one… and I’ve had the bad luck of the draw to get multiple bad screens that looked like shit.

        So I gave up and bought a TLC.

        I cracked it open and unplugged the wifi antenna though, cause you can bet your ass that bitch will never have a chance to phone home and report any and all network snooping.

    • BoofStroke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      But then anybody can connect to its default broadcast. Better to pair it to something you can control.

    • @akrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      It’s mainly done for smart bome feature. People want fully automated homes, and right now more than 90% of all "smart devices are basically botnets. Zigbee ftw.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Why would anyone need a Wi-Fi enabled washing machine. You put clothes in it, and then use the same setting you use every single time you use it, why do you need a complicated interface with a smartphone app for that?

    • @Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      Why not?

      My washing machine has wi-fi. I didn’t buy it for that reason, but it just happens to. Using the app, I have some programme options that aren’t possible to select using the hardware dials. I can do things like change the detergent dosage and the number of additional rinse cycles. It has some “special” programmes for various specific fabrics. And it has things like maintenance diagnostics and the ability to run a specific self-cleaning cycle.

      That’s all pretty useful.

      And what’s the actual danger of connecting it to wi-fi? Will Big Data know how often I wash my towels? Do I need to worry about the government spying on my fabric softener usage? Will hackers seize control of my machine and ransom my ability to get clean underwear?

      I just can’t see the big downside here (other than the fact that the machine is more complicated than it needs to be, but that ship has already sailed seeing as I already own it).

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        And what’s the actual danger of connecting it to wi-fi?

        Not so much that hackers will ransom the washing machine, but that hackers can use IoT devices as a back-door to get into your home network and take over everything else too.

      • @ohlaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        When it starts spying on you, sending conversations, like many smart cars, it is just the beginning.

        • @Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It doesn’t have a microphone or camera, or any other way of recording my conversations. Other than laundry-related data, it really doesn’t know anything worth sharing.

          • @ohlaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            What if it does, but you don’t know about it because it is buried in the terms and conditions?

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Will hackers seize control of my machine and ransom my ability to get clean underwear?

        It’s more likely that they’d seize control of it and add it to their botnet. Which is exactly what it looks like happened here. There was a small package downloaded, then a large amount of outgoing data. That looks like a compromised IoT device being used for a botnet. Small incoming package to hack the device, then the device starts spamming some poor dude across the country as part of a DDOS, because he beat a script kiddie in a COD match and the script kiddie is salty about it.

      • @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My washing machine has wi-fi. I didn’t buy it for that reason, but it just happens to. Using the app

        So you did not just connect it to your home wifi, but you also allowed the vendor to connect it to their servers. Now the vendor knows the name of your WiFi and the password. Just to begin with. Next year maybe this vendor’s website will get hacked and 20000 such wifi passwords go public in some darknet :-)

        Using the app, I have some programme options that aren’t possible to select using the hardware dials.

        Who benefits? You may find it cool to have it in the app, but FIRST the vendor has saved some of their money by not building the needed dials and buttons for these functions. (Or did they give you that discount? ;-))

        And maybe in 3 years from now, they don’t feel like maintaining your app anymore. Are you going to shout “WARRANTY” at them?

        I just can’t see the big downside here (other than the fact that the machine is more complicated than it needs to be

        Yes, that is a downside, too. Part of this ‘smartness’ could break and maybe even the whole thing stops working when these ‘diagnostics’ give false data.

        Another huge point is: My washing machines so far have lasted between 8 - 15 years. But NEVER has any wifi-active device lived that long. Think about this difference, and who’s the one who benefits from it?

  • @spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    LG’s app is an absolute privacy nightmare too. That app must be used if you want access to any smart appliance features and it requires precise location permissions 100% of the time. Even then, the app features are mediocre, it doesn’t work very well and often doesn’t notify of a finished wash load until long after it’s completed.

    Why anyone would want to allow their washing machine manufacturer to continuously track their exact location in exchange for some crappy, poorly implemented features is beyond me.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Thanks for pointing out the location service thing. I just killed that shit.

    • @Octopus1348@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      The LG app also checks SafetyNet/Play Integrity so you can’t use it with root. They probably fear that you can then unleash how much more of a privacy nightmare it is.

    • @MrMukagee@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I just use a timer on my phone … average wash cycle I use is about 30 minutes … just set a timer on your phone … KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid

    • @ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just looked at the app’s permission settings on my phone… set to only allow location while being used.

      Like you I don’t see much use for the app, though the notifications can be handy if you want to know when a load us finished and you can’t hear it’s beeps. I work out of my basement with my washer upstairs so that can be the case with me. But still rare that I ever use it.

      • @spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thinking back, I seem to remember that in order to receive notifications the app had to be running in the background while phone location was turned on, giving LG precise location tracking all the time. Is that no longer the case?

        • @ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I’ve re-enabled notifications now and was receiving them fine with location setting of “only when app in use”. Then this morning I disabled location permissions entirely for the app and I continue to receive the notifications.

          • @spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            The one useful feature I’ve missed is a high temperature warning for my refrigerator, so since they fixed the app it may be time for another try. Thanks for checking that out.

    • @Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      They probably want to see at which aisle your washing machine spends the most time on its grocery trip.

  • @merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There are probably 3 main groups of people with WiFi appliances:

    1. The vast majority of people don’t care, and put it on their normal WiFi router and would never notice something like this
    2. A smaller group of people don’t care much, but pay attention to their bandwidth usage and would spot an appliance trying to send 3.7 GB of data a day
    3. A much smaller group of people are paranoid and would put the device on its own isolated subnet, or use firewall-type features to limit the access their appliances have to the Internet.

    My guess is that if this were a widespread problem, people in the second group would notice, or would have immediately checked and chimed in and said “holy crap, mine is doing this too”. I didn’t hear many people saying that, so I’m guessing this is a bug, and it’s either a one-off weirdness, or it’s a bug related to people in group 3 who are blocking their appliances from being able to connect to the Internet.

    It’s probably something as simple as a badly programmed firmware update check that doesn’t do exponential backoff when it fails. It probably connects, fails, then immediately tries again. A proper exponential backoff would wait before trying again, and if it failed again it would double the wait time down to some minimum value like once per day or something.

    Incidentally, this is also why claims about smartphones monitoring people’s conversations when they’re supposedly off is BS. That would require either huge amounts of bandwidth to transmit all the conversations, or huge amounts of computing power inside the phone to decode the voices. Either way you’d be using tons of battery, and probably a significant amount of bandwidth. There are enough paranoid people out there that if this were a real thing, someone would have caught the devices doing it by now.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      The article gets into what actually happened.

      Dude’s Asus router was incorrectly reporting bandwidth usage.

    • @Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      I think the largest group by far isn’t listed: people who bought an appliance and didn’t care at all that it had WiFi and never connected it their network.

      • ares35
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Error: Wi-Fi must be enabled and connected to load detergent.”

        • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I am getting annoyed at the constant demands from tech that supposedly is owned by me. My gym has an app. It’s cute I guess. It wants to talk to a Fitbit, I blocked access. Every time I go to the gym now I have to confirm again that I don’t want it to talk to a Fitbit.

          Don’t even own a Fitbit

  • DreamButt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Why are people connecting their machines to wifi in the first place?

    • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      It’s starts with a sales pitch (not just to you, it’s sales pitches all the way down) about how the washer can send the user status, maybe let them schedule, etc. They probably have an app to pair with it to keep it all in-house. One thing leads to another, every appliance gets wifi and sends a ton of data to a totally undoubtedly secure and anonymous centralized server full of harmless data for the sake of saving the customer 15 steps.

      Big Brother didn’t ride in on the back of a commie tank, he was invited in for the slightest increase of convenience.

    • @merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I can understand wanting it on your local network. Being able to check remotely how much time is remaining. Getting alerts if it needs maintenance. In a big house with multiple family members all doing laundry, just checking to see if the machine is in use before hauling all your stuff down could be nice. But, that info doesn’t need to leave the house. I don’t know why you’d want that information leaving the house.

      • @Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        My machines are in a disconnected garage. There’s no hearing the beep. And the wash time varies due to load size, to the point that the estimate on the screen isn’t very accurate, so seeing a timer isn’t great either.

        I have never bothered to connect them to wifi yet, though. But a phone notification would have is uses.

        • @AuntieFreeze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          That makes sense. My inlaws have theirs hooked to alexa and the machines are the next room over from their living room. Seems like a little over kill.

        • ares35
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          a kitchen timer or a timer on your phone will be close enough. set it for your own estimate based on experience when you get back in the house from stuffing a load in the washer.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      My smart appliances serve as nodes for Pied Piper’s new decentralized internet.

  • @kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I have a similar model washer/dryer and refuse to put it on my wifi. I only want it to wash and dry.

  • Treczoks
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Just put the device on a separate wifi without internet access, or look at the “child protection” features of your router. Ours can put devices based on their MAC into “access groups” which range from “full access” over “internet from <time> to <time>” to “no internet at all”.

      • Treczoks
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        This is not just about the amount of data. I’m well aware that the measured amounts were totally off. Nonetheless, it is about being allowed to send any kind of data to the outside at all. And while it is probably quite convenient that you can get a message when a device has done a job, it is sufficient that you as the owner gets it, not anyone outside.

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          If you worried about data leaving the house, just don’t connect the thing to the internet. Remote notifications and remote diagnostics for these LG appliances require access to the internet.

          If you want to keep that stuff local, just don’t set it up. The dishwasher will beep when it is done and display error codes when something is busted. Putting it on a closed LAN won’t do anything for the appliance.

      • Treczoks
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Luckily, most embedded devices lack the smart to attach to two networks at the same time. So you keep it locked into a network where it can only do your bidding, and it won’t listen to anyone else. Unless they built in some very crazy and nefarious code and drive around with network enabled cars in the owners neighborhood.

          • Treczoks
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

            No need for an extra router. I just put those device into the “has no internet access” group. It is one of those “Parental Control” things. Every device inside the net can see and talk to it, but itself cannot talk to anything outside.

              • Treczoks
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Until the router needs to be reset, or something else happens to it.

                That’s what “configuration backups” are for. You’ve got some, don’t you?

  • crandlecan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Plot twist: it was the Asus router misreporting the amount of data.