People Are Increasingly Worried AI Will Make Daily Life Worse::A Pew survey finds that a majority of Americans are more concerned than excited about the impact of artificial intelligence—adding weight to calls for more regulation.

  • @nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    every new technology makes life more easy and convenient and noisy and annoying and depressing and bad

  • @Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    No, people are concerned other people are using AI for dirty shit that will end up making lives harder for 90% of us … you all know which 90% …

  • @Plibbert@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Yeah, cruel fact about humanity. All these great technologies could give us luxury space communism in 100 years or so, but that won’t happen. Shitty people will be shitty and these technologies will be used for shitty purposes or intentionally stunted.

        • @Estiar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Remember how Soviet workers would smuggle parts out of their jobs to reuse themselves? There was a job field filled by babushkas that would inspect workers before they left. Is that the fault of capitalism? I know the people at the top do it much worse, but humans naturally compete with each other.

          • @treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            People are capable of both competition and cooperation.

            Capitalism goes out of the way to make the former a value.

            Yes, greed is in our nature. But so is altruism. And the idea that people are just greedy by nature, and that all altruism has ulterior motivation, is something capitalists have actively encouraged to justify their values.

            So yes, when it comes to greed in the West and how it’s become a value rather than a sin (Jesus eye if the needle parable), I blame capitalism. Of course, if humans didn’t have the capacity for greed capitalism wouldn’t exist.

            But to dismiss capitalism as a non-factor at this point in history because humans are greedy by nature, well, it’s propaganda and not based on a modern scientific understanding of human nature.

            • @Estiar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Yeah that’s fair. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. We shouldn’t rely on greed to make a system nor altruism alone. The difficult part is actually making a system that works.

              • @treefrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                The Buddhist economy is essentially a gift economy that has survived for 2500 years.

                Shit, our genealogy is also basically a gift economy, and one much more ancient than Buddhism.

                Which is my way of saying I think the system is in our nature. If we can learn to embrace life and stop being so terrified of our individual deaths.

                The best systems happen organically after all. And without coercion.

    • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Specifically capitalism paired with zero sum game mentality.

      If someone is convinced the only way for themselves to win is to make other people (including me) lose, that’s where the biggest problems happen.

  • @DrQuint@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    There’s a issue with this title, and it’s not the word “AI”.

    It’s the word “Will”.

    It already did.

    • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I came here to say this. We’ve had threats of “AI” for a while, and initially, it should have been better, but it wasn’t. Look at the latest voice assistant from your favorite large corporation spy gadget, like an echo dot. The voice assistant sucks. It constantly misunderstands you, half the time you get feedback like “I don’t understand” despite asking for something you’ve asked for before, in the same way you’ve asked before, and had it do something before, but now, no, fuck you.

      Responses are repetitious and boring, like “playing (song) by (artist) on (streaming service)” or “turning on x lights”… Always the same, always boring. Ask about almost anything beyond a function, and usually you get a quote snippet from a webpage you’ve never heard of, which only mentions whatever you asked for and doesn’t provide any actual information 90% of the time. It would be more useful for it to respond with “I found this on the web” followed by the sounds of hippos farting.

      This is the “AI” we had until now, and it’s the AI we constantly interact with. None of the star trek computer level intelligence where you can ask your assistant to increase the illumination, and have it do something because it understands the intent behind what you’re saying, not just running a select statement on your literal words… And that’s even if it understands at all. You don’t see Will Riker standing there arguing with the computer like “no, I asked for a coffee” while the replicator is populated by a cookie.

      Then LLMs go into widespread use and the system shits out stuff like chat GPT which most people can’t seem distinguish from talking to a person, and now we live in this hellscape. AI chatbots are now selling us shit, replying to our emails, posing as real people even…

      And I’m just talking about speech-based AI… Don’t get me started on the insanity of image AI.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        You don’t have to look at things like that. Think of a different voice assistant. The one at every telephone system at every big corporation that’s now “intelligent.”

        That used to be a person.

        AI is already taking away jobs.

        • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Many of those jobs were already killed off by IVR systems.

          Any company that still has a live “operator” type job… Well, it’s usually piled onto another role, like receptionist. Many small to mid sized businesses basically hire a receptionist as a catch all for other jobs. Someone to accept deliveries, answer the phone, greet people coming in, do little odd jobs around the office.

          Reduction of the workforce by turning a once straight forward job like receptionist into an agglutination of smaller jobs that they don’t want to have to pay someone to do, is the norm. Eliminating positions and entire swarms of people with a single individual who both doesn’t really do a job, but does every job.

  • Bernie Ecclestoned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    People are increasingly worried, full stop.

    Doom loop news cycle doesn’t help.

  • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -72 years ago

    Because everything is full of rediculous doom scenarios that don’t even make sense and no one talks about the great things it enables.

  • @djsaskdja@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    Every other technical innovation has made the average person’s life worse. Why would this one be any different?

    • @1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      This is not true. You are living in a warm house and have fresh water and food and a lot of nice furniture. We don’t think about these things but that’s because they are default now.

    • @jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’m rather enjoying my electricity, my antibiotics, my vaccines against respiratory viruses, my access to unlimited information and pornography, My ability to drive cars that are pretty reliable, my ability to travel anywhere in the world at any time at doable prices, technology has treated us pretty well.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I think in recent years a lot of “innovation” has been pure marketing fluff and had no real potential to change the world. This one really might. I’ve tempered my expectations, because tech bros really want us to believe there is magic to AI, but eventually it might actually change the world.

  • @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    It is not shocking that people are worried about AI impacting their lives negatively when nearly all of the main stream coverage of it centers around all of the ways, both real and conspiratorial, that it will hurt them.

  • @ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    It already has. Autocorrect has gone to compete shit. Online news reports have become nothing but buzz words. Internet searches have become useless.

    All of these are results of companies switching from simple algorithms that were already proven to work just fine to “artificial” intelligence which is practically useless at this point for anything other than deep fakes or eldritch horror images.

    • @FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Online news reports have become nothing but buzz words

      Wasn’t that the case for the past decade or so already?

      I don’t see such an amazing difference in daily news unless maybe you’re reading some already worthless tabloid rags. Journalism has to be searched for and usually paid for. Free “news” sites were always clickbait and pointless reposts of real sources.

    • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Why would advances in AI make autocorrect worse? I don’t use it because it sucks, but it’s always been like that.

      • @ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Because it was already established. The algorithm was already used to my word choice and was easily able to figure out what word I’m trying to use (I use swipe to text) and now I have to manually type out words I use regularly because the new ai system doesn’t know what the fuck I want.

        It’s like making a better mousetrap. Don’t fix what isn’t fuckin broken.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Oh good. Sounds like the next iteration of iOS will forget my daughter’s name.

        • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I don’t know what you’re talking about. Autocorrect has always been just as bad as it is now. If newer systems were worse, why would they implement them?

  • @kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    I’m worried because AI is supposed to be sorting trash, cleaning sewers, and other laborious work. Instead we got AI trying to take the jobs of artists. 🤦🏽‍♂️

    • @FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      That’s just the most visible part because artists are constantly complaining about it in the news. In fact the news loves reporting doom scenarios for everything (because in the end that’s what the consumer clicks on.)

      But for laborious work you just need robots, not AI. Robots already took over a huge chuck of dangerous, laborious work and will continue to take more.

  • @Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Go to any McDonald’s drive thru with the automated ordering. You will realize it is already making life worse.

    • @1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      Yup so far. It’s the beginning of the curve now when everything is new and awesome.

      Enjoy it while it lasts.

      • @Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Said the same above but will share here too. I actually see that curve another way. We will not need the employers. I used to be an employee and now I am independent and doing the work that would normally require a team of people and big money backing it all up. I think this is going to become more and more apparent as time goes on as while yes, AI will benefit corporations, it also equally benefit individuals. Corporations are the ones who are most in trouble. Cute that they think they are going to be the winners here.

        • @1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I’ve been a contractor too so I know what you mean. But most people are not and don’t want to be. It’s more risky and most people just want safety.

          • @Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I agree but we really need to encourage those who think they are in a safe employee job that they are not safe and that they need to start investing in themselves. Something on the side to start, but something. Anything. Even if it fails as you still learn something. The age of employees is coming to an end and the more energy you put into holding on to that is less energy in adapting to the new world emerging. Follow a passion and develop new skills. You can love your work.

            • @1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I have the same mindset as you and I agree, but I have almost never managed to convince someone else to go into contracting. They don’t want to risk that sweet stable income. :)

              Also some of them buy into the entire thing with colleagues being their friends etc etc.

              Some of them prioritize family in front of work and want their jobs to be as easy as possible so they can focus on their families instead.

              But yes, to me being an employee is the worst form of employment. You usually don’t learn much after the initial year, and you get lazy and stop learning. Your skills are therefore not growing anymore. Getting a new job is harder, and you are likely to accept the first offer once you want to switch.

      • @Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I am imagineering a highly detailed VR Theme Park inspired by parks like EPCOT, Disneyland, Universal, Efteling, and worlds fairs. A big part of this is coding and wow…Chat GPT 4 Pro with the code interpreter is saving me a lot of time. My output has speed up 5x over the last month or so. Back in May it would save me time as much as waste with hallucinations, but it has majorly improved with very few hallucinations these days. I can tell it what I want and it will spit out the code nearly perfect every time in seconds. The only down side is it cannot work on my larger scripts yet so I still have to write those myself, but it can help with smaller portions of it which still saves me time. Also it is utterly amazing at reading error logs. You know the massive ones with thousands of lines, most irrelevant. It can zero in on the lines I need to know about so fast that that alone is worth the $20 monthly fee. I am loving it. I cannot wait for it to get better as personally I rather not write any code and my core skill is in imagineering and the overall experience.

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    As always, the problem aren’t the tools. It’s the psychopath executives, marketers, venture capitalists, etc, that are going to bring us Boring Dystopia 2.0 by using these tools mostly for evil. It’s already happening. It’s going to speed up, and it’s going to permeate everything. Massive layoffs, intrusive surveillance, misinformation, etc.

    Combined with the Internet of Shit…it’s going to suck in brand new ways. And then people will be surprised and wonder how we got here.