Is there a one time payment option to remove ads?

Or is sync ultra the only way to remove ads?

I would love to support sync, but the subscription fatigue is real.

  • @SamboT@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Get the duckduckgo app and go to settings and enable the BETA feature to disable trackers from apps on your device.

    You will see blank spots that say sponsored content but you will not see the actual ads. Good enough for me.

  • trimmerfrost
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Cancel all your other subscriptions other than sync. Because it’s the only one worth. 17 dollars a year ain’t much imo

    • @kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      It’s not localized pricing yet, which means it could be weeks worth of a wage in poorer countries. $17 american is a lot if you go to some SEA countries.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      What other Lemmy apps have a subscription?

      • Fazoo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        As a Sync Pro Reddit user, I was excited for the switch. I’m just sticking to Jerboa. It gets the job done. There isn’t enough content on here to justify spending money imo.

  • @Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It will continue to be so weird for me to go from no ads to ads (or paying a subscription) just because you like the interface a bit more. All the free UIs already available seem perfectly usable and roughly equivalent in convenience.

    • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Yeah, if subscription is the only way to remove ads then I’m fine with the Foss options like liftoff. And I’m blocking ads system wide on my phone, so it’s not like I see any ads on Sync. But, I would still prefer to be able to pay to remove it, since I have moved away from using apps that have ads in favor of Foss or paying to for the ad free version over the years.

      • Lemmington Bunnie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Yep, I had my credit card out (figuratively) and was ready to buy the ad free version, just to support the dev - but I turned right around when I saw the price (AUD$34).

        I don’t see ads either, it was literally just about the support for me. I’m weighing up whether to go back to Connect on principle, and if Adguard stops working on Sync, I’ll definitely just walk away.

      • nobody
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Hey, any tips to block ads system wide?

    • @photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Yeah. I don’t see a compelling reason to switch to Sync when there are so many other alternatives that are free and without ads. And then comes the subscription! Get outta here. I’m not even going to mention the data tracking. I’m sticking with my FOSS apps, thank you very much.

    • @SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Honestly I would prefer to be able to buy a separate “Pro” version from the Play Store, without an in-app purchase. There have been issued in the past where in-app purchases didn’t get recognized or when ads suddenly started appearing for people who bought the ad removal option.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    I can’t see ads (only a placeholder) due to my adblocker, but cannot purchase a subscription anyway (no play store)

    Screenshot of Sync for Lemmy with an ad placeholder

    Spoiler

    Screenshot of Sync for Lemmy with an error connecting to Google Play

  • wilberfan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    subscription fatigue is real.

    I LOL’d at that phrase. So true. That being said, $17/yr feels pretty reasonable to me.

    So far, I’m seeing placeholders for ads in my feed–but no actual ads. But I have multiple layers of adblocking set up at home, so…

    • @usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      $17/yr feels crazy expensive. After only a few years it’s the price of a AAA video game which obviously has an order of magnitude more development put into it. The money wouldn’t even be going towards Lemmy where the real costs are since they are the ones actually hosting it all…

      • wilberfan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        $17 is almost 20% less than it will cost me to see OPPENHEIMER in 70mm IMAX. The former lasts a year, the latter 3 hours. Which will be more engaging? 🤔

        • @madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Your point makes no sense. If we are going by amount of work per hour / price, if Oppenheimer costs 17$,then sync should cost like 2c…

        • @usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          How much of that ticket price went to the projectionist? I feel that would be the equivalent of Sync in this comparison since the actual hosting and creation of the content is elsewhere, Sync is just one person who shows it to you

      • @Boinketh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        Apps used to be, what, $5? Now everything’s a subscription and you end up paying 10x as much money if you use the app for just a few years. I will never buy into the subscription model for services that used to be single-payment. Never.

        • Fazoo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Everyone and their mother thinks they’re a SaaS provider.

          • @thecodemonk@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            I’d rather it be that then what we used to deal with… 6 month old apps that never got any more updates because the dev has no incentive to keep developing it.

          • @o_oli@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Ultimately if it earns more money, people will do it, and I can’t blame people for wanting to earn more money because I’m sure most of us would do the same in that position. Like sure £1.99 to perma remove ads is great but I’m sure you can’t retire on that as a dev lol.

    • @spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Subscription models only make sense for an app/service that have recurring costs.

      In the case of Lemmy apps, the instances are the ones with recurring hosting costs, not the apps.

      If an app doesn’t have recurring hosting costs, it only makes sense to have one up front payment and then maybe in app purchases to pay for new features going forward.

      Subscription models for an app that’s not hosting anything is just the dev wanting a constant revenue stream, no matter how they try to word it.

  • @mtb0w@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I don’t have any ads and i haven’t put down any money yet so I’m hoping that just never changes

  • @MegaUltrChicken@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    While I really like the app, I still find the communities need to grow before I invest in it. So far it’s been great. Just feels a little empty.

  • Cory
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    The dev is working on one and it’ll be released soon